This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was a more stronger Earthquake 2 Hours after.-- BangertNo ( talk) 19:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes has been carried out. |
October 2016 Italy earthquakes → October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes – the Earthquakes where in Central Italy, having the same style as August 2016 Central Italy earthquake Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 20:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Wykx ( talk) 21:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I made User:Itu/script/ingv_quake2wikitable.sh to produce wikitable comfortable and avoid typos.... -- Itu ( talk) 22:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
I propose that October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes and August 2016 Central Italy earthquake be merged into 2016 Central Italy earthquakes . I think that the content in the two articles can easily be explained in the context of only one article, since US Geological Survey and INGV (National Geological Institute of Italy) consider it's the same seismic event and same geological system. Geographical area is the same (epicenters are only 15 miles distant eachother), population is the same, it's the same seismic sequence, in reconstruction they will consider just one unique earthquake emergency, there isn't any new foundrising campain, the special earthquake commissioner who manages the emergency is the same. The same situation happened for the 2012 Emilia earthquake, when there were 3 different big shakes, but actually there is just one article. In the italian wiki we are discussing about it, and almost all users are agree to write just one article, orherwise there will be a duplication. Holapaco77 ( talk) 14:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Holapaco77 ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
There has recently been some to-and-fro editing about the observed seismic intensities. The USGS values are good early estimates of the intensities, but they are not the last word. This paper by Paolo Galli and others reports a detailed survey of damage and intensity levels across the area of the earthquakes. For the 30 October event they give an Io (intensity at the epicentre) value of 11 on the MCS ( Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg) scale - another updating of the original Mercalli scale, but a close equivalent of the MMI scale (see here for more details). The Galli et al. paper also gives values for the 24 August earthquake, with an Imax (maximum observed intensity) of 10-11 on the MCS scale. Mikenorton ( talk) 16:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was a more stronger Earthquake 2 Hours after.-- BangertNo ( talk) 19:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes has been carried out. |
October 2016 Italy earthquakes → October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes – the Earthquakes where in Central Italy, having the same style as August 2016 Central Italy earthquake Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 20:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Wykx ( talk) 21:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I made User:Itu/script/ingv_quake2wikitable.sh to produce wikitable comfortable and avoid typos.... -- Itu ( talk) 22:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
I propose that October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes and August 2016 Central Italy earthquake be merged into 2016 Central Italy earthquakes . I think that the content in the two articles can easily be explained in the context of only one article, since US Geological Survey and INGV (National Geological Institute of Italy) consider it's the same seismic event and same geological system. Geographical area is the same (epicenters are only 15 miles distant eachother), population is the same, it's the same seismic sequence, in reconstruction they will consider just one unique earthquake emergency, there isn't any new foundrising campain, the special earthquake commissioner who manages the emergency is the same. The same situation happened for the 2012 Emilia earthquake, when there were 3 different big shakes, but actually there is just one article. In the italian wiki we are discussing about it, and almost all users are agree to write just one article, orherwise there will be a duplication. Holapaco77 ( talk) 14:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Holapaco77 ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
There has recently been some to-and-fro editing about the observed seismic intensities. The USGS values are good early estimates of the intensities, but they are not the last word. This paper by Paolo Galli and others reports a detailed survey of damage and intensity levels across the area of the earthquakes. For the 30 October event they give an Io (intensity at the epicentre) value of 11 on the MCS ( Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg) scale - another updating of the original Mercalli scale, but a close equivalent of the MMI scale (see here for more details). The Galli et al. paper also gives values for the 24 August earthquake, with an Imax (maximum observed intensity) of 10-11 on the MCS scale. Mikenorton ( talk) 16:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)