This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 9 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Visual object recognition. The result of the discussion was Moved to Object recognition (cognitive science). |
This paper presents the history of visual field neurons in a descriptive and detailed way that gives a good account of Hubel and Wiesel's experiments on receptive fields. [1]
I think a section should be added that describes the background experiments and history of visual object recognition. This would include the structures of simple and complex cells as well as several of Hubel and Weisel's experiments on receptive fields on ganglion cells of the retina. Kibarhorst ( talk) 19:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC) Sanocki, T., & Sulman, N. (2009). Priming of simple and complex scene layout: Rapid function from the intermediate level. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 35(3), 735-749. doi:10.1037/a0013032 Kibarhorst ( talk) 19:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC) Kibarhorst ( talk) 20:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
References
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kibarhorst, Jackkennedy17. Peer reviewers: Vewalke.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article lacks a strong opening, which provides a basis for what the rest of the article will be about. In addition to the opening lacking, many of the sections need more depth and detail, such as the entire "Recognition Memory" section. While the sources seem reliable and relevant from the ones I looked at, I feel as though a lot of them are not used or explained properly. The writing style could also be refined a bit to sound more scholarly and less subjective. The Alzheimer's discussion, for example, is unclear in the information that it is trying to give off, as the last two sentences seem to contradict each other. Overall, the piece needs more depth, accurate details and more objective, unbiased writing. Jackkennedy17 ( talk) 00:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC) Jackkennedy17 ( talk) 00:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Randykitty: I don't understand this article's new title: it doesn't specifically mention animal testing (and also describes object recognition in humans), but its title was changed to Visual object recognition (animal test). What is the reason for this new title? Jarble ( talk) 00:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Object recognition (cognitive science). ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Mdaniels5757 ( talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Visual object recognition (animal test) → Visual object recognition – This article does not deal specifically with animal testing, and it is unclear why animal test is part of the page name. ParticipantObserver ( talk) 14:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 9 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Visual object recognition. The result of the discussion was Moved to Object recognition (cognitive science). |
This paper presents the history of visual field neurons in a descriptive and detailed way that gives a good account of Hubel and Wiesel's experiments on receptive fields. [1]
I think a section should be added that describes the background experiments and history of visual object recognition. This would include the structures of simple and complex cells as well as several of Hubel and Weisel's experiments on receptive fields on ganglion cells of the retina. Kibarhorst ( talk) 19:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC) Sanocki, T., & Sulman, N. (2009). Priming of simple and complex scene layout: Rapid function from the intermediate level. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 35(3), 735-749. doi:10.1037/a0013032 Kibarhorst ( talk) 19:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC) Kibarhorst ( talk) 20:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
References
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kibarhorst, Jackkennedy17. Peer reviewers: Vewalke.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article lacks a strong opening, which provides a basis for what the rest of the article will be about. In addition to the opening lacking, many of the sections need more depth and detail, such as the entire "Recognition Memory" section. While the sources seem reliable and relevant from the ones I looked at, I feel as though a lot of them are not used or explained properly. The writing style could also be refined a bit to sound more scholarly and less subjective. The Alzheimer's discussion, for example, is unclear in the information that it is trying to give off, as the last two sentences seem to contradict each other. Overall, the piece needs more depth, accurate details and more objective, unbiased writing. Jackkennedy17 ( talk) 00:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC) Jackkennedy17 ( talk) 00:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Randykitty: I don't understand this article's new title: it doesn't specifically mention animal testing (and also describes object recognition in humans), but its title was changed to Visual object recognition (animal test). What is the reason for this new title? Jarble ( talk) 00:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Object recognition (cognitive science). ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Mdaniels5757 ( talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Visual object recognition (animal test) → Visual object recognition – This article does not deal specifically with animal testing, and it is unclear why animal test is part of the page name. ParticipantObserver ( talk) 14:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)