![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Nice work getting this articles entered. I know it is a lot of hard work and you are on the right track toward following the overall Wikipedia style. There are some general formatting and layout improvements you can make. Check out WP:LAYOUT and also periodically review Wikipedia:Writing better articles for reminders of what makes a good article.
The formatting in the first section is very unusual and inconsistent with the other sections. Consider revising it to look consistent throughout.
Keep up the good work. § Music Sorter § ( talk) 16:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
The article says: If no page has been assigned, SVS causes an Abnormal End (ABEND) with the same ABEND code (0C4) that MVT would have used for a protection violation. This would avoid the SPIE handling of this case with code 4, which is what I think should happen. Only without an appropriate SPIE routine should it generate S0C4. Gah4 ( talk) 00:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I believe that OS/360 uses the TOD clock if sysgenned for S/370 hardware. I suspect that it is correct, that the interval timer is used for other timing. It doesn't actually explain the OS/360 case, though. Gah4 ( talk) 00:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
References
The result of the move request was: not moved. The discussion appears to have concluded in a consensus that the current, abbreviated title is more common and less clunky than the spelled-out version. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
OS/VS2 (SVS) → Single Virtual Storage – Or Operating System/Virtual Storage 2, depending on which name you want to use - the current hybrid title is an unreadable mess. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Support of multiple virtual storages (MVS) and loosely and tightly coupled multiprocessing configurations is provided. in OS/VS2 MVS, which consists of OS/VS2 Releases 2 and up.
"Operating System/Virtual Storage 2" *is* a correct name...for a page that covers both SVS and MVS.
I have manuals that refer to both by release [1] and never use the terms SVS and MVS. I also have manuals that use the abbreviation VS2, rather than the longer OS/VS2, to abbreviate Operating System/Virtual Storage 2. Bitsavers has manuals [2] that never mention any OS/VS2 beyond Release 1 and never mention either the term SVS nor the term MVS.
As best I can tell, the term SVS came in with Release 1.7 and the term MVS came in with Release 3.6 or 3.7. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul ( talk) 13:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
the term MVS came in with Release 3.6 or 3.7you mean the term MVS used without "OS/VS2" preceding it, that term is used by itself in earlier manuals, and the 3.7 "OS/VS2 MVS Overview" [6] largely speaks just of "MVS", but also speaks in the tile of "OS/VS2 MVS" and speaks, at the beginning of chapter 1 ("Introduction"), of "the IBM Operating System/Virtual Storage with Multiple Virtual Storage".
As best I can tell, the term SVS came in with Release 1.7I meant that
... the term MVS came in with Release 3.6 or 3.7I meant that
<-- keep after last sig -->
References
Information in this manual applies to both OS/VS2 Release 1.6 and the component release of DSS for OS/VS 1 Release 2.
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Nice work getting this articles entered. I know it is a lot of hard work and you are on the right track toward following the overall Wikipedia style. There are some general formatting and layout improvements you can make. Check out WP:LAYOUT and also periodically review Wikipedia:Writing better articles for reminders of what makes a good article.
The formatting in the first section is very unusual and inconsistent with the other sections. Consider revising it to look consistent throughout.
Keep up the good work. § Music Sorter § ( talk) 16:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
The article says: If no page has been assigned, SVS causes an Abnormal End (ABEND) with the same ABEND code (0C4) that MVT would have used for a protection violation. This would avoid the SPIE handling of this case with code 4, which is what I think should happen. Only without an appropriate SPIE routine should it generate S0C4. Gah4 ( talk) 00:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I believe that OS/360 uses the TOD clock if sysgenned for S/370 hardware. I suspect that it is correct, that the interval timer is used for other timing. It doesn't actually explain the OS/360 case, though. Gah4 ( talk) 00:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
References
The result of the move request was: not moved. The discussion appears to have concluded in a consensus that the current, abbreviated title is more common and less clunky than the spelled-out version. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
OS/VS2 (SVS) → Single Virtual Storage – Or Operating System/Virtual Storage 2, depending on which name you want to use - the current hybrid title is an unreadable mess. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Support of multiple virtual storages (MVS) and loosely and tightly coupled multiprocessing configurations is provided. in OS/VS2 MVS, which consists of OS/VS2 Releases 2 and up.
"Operating System/Virtual Storage 2" *is* a correct name...for a page that covers both SVS and MVS.
I have manuals that refer to both by release [1] and never use the terms SVS and MVS. I also have manuals that use the abbreviation VS2, rather than the longer OS/VS2, to abbreviate Operating System/Virtual Storage 2. Bitsavers has manuals [2] that never mention any OS/VS2 beyond Release 1 and never mention either the term SVS nor the term MVS.
As best I can tell, the term SVS came in with Release 1.7 and the term MVS came in with Release 3.6 or 3.7. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul ( talk) 13:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
the term MVS came in with Release 3.6 or 3.7you mean the term MVS used without "OS/VS2" preceding it, that term is used by itself in earlier manuals, and the 3.7 "OS/VS2 MVS Overview" [6] largely speaks just of "MVS", but also speaks in the tile of "OS/VS2 MVS" and speaks, at the beginning of chapter 1 ("Introduction"), of "the IBM Operating System/Virtual Storage with Multiple Virtual Storage".
As best I can tell, the term SVS came in with Release 1.7I meant that
... the term MVS came in with Release 3.6 or 3.7I meant that
<-- keep after last sig -->
References
Information in this manual applies to both OS/VS2 Release 1.6 and the component release of DSS for OS/VS 1 Release 2.