This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
In 1999, the 96 used to be similar to what the 87 does now (at least West of downtown). Then it was merged with the
97, leaving the 96 slot vacant for one (or two?) years, then reintroduced in its current configuration. If someone has old route maps from that period, it would be encyclopedic to include that historical note. --
RealGrouchy00:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Thanks for that! I've also noticed that someone on a personal transit website that he had an archived old map of the 96.--
JForget02:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
In 1999, the 96 used to be similar to what the 87 does now (at least West of downtown). Then it was merged with the
97, leaving the 96 slot vacant for one (or two?) years, then reintroduced in its current configuration. If someone has old route maps from that period, it would be encyclopedic to include that historical note. --
RealGrouchy00:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Thanks for that! I've also noticed that someone on a personal transit website that he had an archived old map of the 96.--
JForget02:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)reply