The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fails Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event ( WP:BLP1E ) Venkat TL ( talk) 07:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
An RfC closed in 2021 found Most users believe that AfD should be used to settle controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting." [2] Since at least three users have opposed the blanking [3] [4] [5], not including the user who created the article and others who have edited the article in the meantime, its quite obvious that the blanking here is "controversial". Please use AfD to get consensus. VR talk 05:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
"should stubify the section on Nupur_Sharma_(politician)#Comments_on_Prophet_Muhammad and only include no more than 1 paragraph that she made comments which attracted controversy and she got expelled. Yes the main link to the article can be retained"and Venkat TL agreed that
" I agree with your suggestion about summarizing the controversy section on Nupur Bio."Captain Jack Sparrow ( talk) 09:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
You cannot claim to have "consensus" without even receiving input from the largest contributor of the page" reeks of WP:OWN and you restored content that has very less or nothing to do with Nupur such as the declaration by Mufti of Oman. It should be removed. The details about the controversy that are targeting more than just Nupur should be covered in the main controversy article. Captain Jack Sparrow ( talk) 11:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Alt News denied any responsibility for the reaction the viewers after watching the video clip." to "Alt News denied any responsibility for the reaction by the viewers after watching the video clip." ("by" has been edited in the corrected sentence) EruOfArda ( talk) 12:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
203.192.243.5 ( talk) 18:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Why are her remarks being deleted? Is there no verifiable source. People come to Wikipedia for information and there's barely anything here on the actual crux of the controversy. SuhitaSaha1205 ( talk) 16:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
There are umpteen sources cited in the article, all of which call him "Prophet Muhammad". That includes CNN/Reuers. Can people please refrain from WP:OR and stick to sources? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Please provide the full name of "S. A. R. Geelani". A contributor suggested that his name is "Syed Abdul Rahman Geelani". Is that correct? Mksword ( talk) 19:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
@ LearnIndology This version after your trimming is severely lacking in content. I believe excessive amount of content was removed that left the article lacking. I suggest all participants to discuss here what content can possibly be removed instead of edit warring. Venkat TL ( talk) 11:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Somebody added this Washington Post citation
What is this supposed to be for? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 13:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Ghodbunder, can you explain which source justifies your addition: made in response to the "continuous insult and disregard" towards the Hindu deity
Shiva.
[1]
[2]
made
here? --
Kautilya3 (
talk)
16:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
References
The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[2] the contribution.[3]I am asking for a quotation that demonstrates that it "directly supports" your content. It is a reasonable request, and I am sure the admins will agree. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I am not editing any article on current S. Asian politics and do not plan to edit this article to any considerable extent either. But, there exists a few glaring issues which might be taken care of by ECP:
which later developed into a controversyetc. TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
We need better sources for birth verification - place and date/year. OneIndia is hardly an RS and BusinessStandard ref doesn't verify it — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 06:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Opindia website mentions her as the Editor, OpIndia.com since October 2017 as .Want to add this to the lead.She is the Editor has not resigned as of now. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Please clarify that this is "Temporary suspension pending investigation", basically hogwash till the matter is in news. This is standard modus operandi in BJP with several members getting their membership reinstated and suspension revoked along with getting party ticket for election in a few months. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
"Described as brash and articulate
" possible
WP:NPOV violation in the lead?
I know it's cited as being from a BBC article, but I think it needs to be clear such that no one can infer that Wikipedia is taking a position. ( 👋 • 🗣 • ✍️) 13:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Kautilya3 you have reverted me twice here and here and made an accusation of "whitewashing" for sourcing content from a more reliable source. Please explain your action. -- Webberbrad007 ( talk) 07:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Webberbrad007, please don't gaslight us. I didn't revert a "source". I reverted your free-wheeling rewrite of the existing content with no explanation. Hee is the existing content. Please tell us what part of it needs to be modified and why.
The BJP supporters, including some popular politicians, rallied behind Nupur Sharma and criticised the party and the government for buckling under international pressure. Hashtags such as "#ShameOnBJP" and "#ISupportNupurSharma" trended on Twitter in her support. [1] [2] [3]
References
- ^ Sheikh Saaliq (AP) (6 June 2022), "Muslim nations slam India over insulting remarks about Islam", The Wasington Post,
Modi's party also faced anger from some of its own supporters, but it was for a different reason. Many Hindu nationalists posted comments on social media saying the government was buckling under international pressure.- ^ Geeta Pandey (7 June 2022), "Nupur Sharma: The Indian woman behind offensive Prophet Muhammad comments", BBC News,
But since her suspension, support has also been growing for the beleaguered former BJP spokesperson - hashtags such as #ISupportNupurSharma and #TakeBackNupurSharma have trended daily on social media, with tens of thousands praising her.- ^ "Right-wing ecosystem turns on BJP for suspending Nupur Sharma", The Telegraph (India), 7 June 2022,
While many young BJP cadres and leaders expressed their disgust privately at the action against Sharma, Delhi leader Kapil Mishra — accused of delivering hate speeches in the run-up to the February 2020 riots — expressed his displeasure in public.
Even if we take your word that you were "replacing the existing source with RSPSS", there was no explanation of why this was being done. The WP:ONUS is on you to argue for your revised content (and, at the same time, the deletion of the existing content). -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Twitter hashtags like #ShameOnBJP trended after Ms. Sharma’s suspension with many prominent BJP supporters, though not officially members of the BJP, expressing the sentiment that Ms. Sharma and Mr. Kumar had been abandoned by the party at a time when Ms. Sharma had also received death threats over her remarks.
though not officially members of the BJPthen true? The text in the article is fine as it is. Hemantha ( talk) 13:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Webberbrad007 ( talk) 23:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[The BJP MP extending support to Nupur Sharma] said, “These non-believers have always done so. Kamlesh Tiwari said something and he was killed. Someone else [Nupur Sharma] said something and they also received a death threat. They distort our gods and goddess and make films about them. They have been doing this for years… That shows their mentality.”
Ghodbunder, Ipdesign1 why do you believe that "Controversial" doesn't apply to these remarks? The remarks have clearly created a controversy. -- Webberbrad007 ( talk) 14:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Info on her mother's origin seems coming very abruptly, Idk if that has any relevance as of now ?
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 15:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently an unresolved dispute: Should we include the point about some BJP members supporting Nupur Sharma and objecting to her suspension given that she has received death threats? Webberbrad007 ( talk) 22:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC) This is specified in The Hindu article here which states:
Twitter hashtags like #ShameOnBJP trended after Ms. Sharma’s suspension with many prominent BJP supporters, though not officially members of the BJP, expressing the sentiment that Ms. Sharma and Mr. Kumar had been abandoned by the party at a time when Ms. Sharma had also received death threats over her remarks.
The Hindu is included as the Newspaper of record for India in WP:RSPSS and is generally reliable list.
Please select from Proposal A or Proposal B (or some clear equivalent) below with a brief explanation of why or why not. The current wording is Proposal A and is in the Comments about Muhammad section.
Many BJP supporters, including some BJP politicians, rallied behind Nupur Sharma and criticised the party and the government for abandoning her and buckling under international pressure. Hashtags such as "#ShameOnBJP" and "#ISupportNupurSharma" trended on Twitter. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Many BJP supporters, including some BJP politicians, rallied behind Nupur Sharma and criticised the party and the government for abandoning her at a time when she had received death threats over her remarks. They were also critical of the party and the government for buckling under international pressure. Hashtags such as "#ShameOnBJP" and "#ISupportNupurSharma" trended on Twitter. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Webberbrad007 ( talk) 22:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
References
Modi's party also faced anger from some of its own supporters, but it was for a different reason. Many Hindu nationalists posted comments on social media saying the government was buckling under international pressure.
But since her suspension, support has also been growing for the beleaguered former BJP spokesperson - hashtags such as #ISupportNupurSharma and #TakeBackNupurSharma have trended daily on social media, with tens of thousands praising her.
While many young BJP cadres and leaders expressed their disgust privately at the action against Sharma, Delhi leader Kapil Mishra — accused of delivering hate speeches in the run-up to the February 2020 riots — expressed his displeasure in public.
[The BJP MP extending support to Nupur Sharma] said, “These non-believers have always done so. Kamlesh Tiwari said something and he was killed. Someone else [Nupur Sharma] said something and they also received a death threat. They distort our gods and goddess and make films about them. They have been doing this for years… That shows their mentality.”
Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. It tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government.
There is consensus that The Hindu is generally reliable and should be treated as a newspaper of record. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline.
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
THE SECTION THAT QUOTES AS " COMMENTS ABOUT MUHAMMAD " I WANT TO CHANGE IT TO " COMMENTS ABOUT PROPHET MUHAMMAD" Sahir01 ( talk) 14:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Please help to expand the new article. Venkat TL ( talk) 19:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add this, "
Children in madrasas are taught that punishment for blasphemy is beheading according to Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan, speaking on the Udaipur killing.
[1]
[2]
", this, "The Supreme Court said Nupur Sharma's outburst is responsible for the unfortunate murder of a tailor at Udaipur.
[3]
" and this, "The Udaipur court transferred tailor Kanhaiya Lal's murder case to the
National Investigation Agency (NIA).
[4]-
Mossad3 (
talk)
15:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. Supreme court comments are undue. Kanhaiya Lal is not relevant here as there is no mention in the article. Khan's comments may perhaps be discussed, I don't know.
Hemantha (
talk)
16:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)::So please add Khan's comments to the article.-
Mossad3 (
talk)
17:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please also add: "
A shop owner in Amravati was most likely killed for a post supporting Nupur Sharma
."
[1]-
Mossad3 (
talk)
16:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit extended-protected}}
template. The same response as above.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
12:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)References
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The
Aisha article says, "Some traditional hadith sources state that Aisha was betrothed to Muhammad at the age of 6 or 7;[12] other sources say she was 9 when she had a small marriage ceremony
" and so that sentence should be added to the lead so that our readers know why she said what she said (Nupur Sharma).-
Mossad3 (
talk)
01:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
edit extended-protected}}
template.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
12:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Some traditional hadith sources state that Aisha was six years of age when she was married to Muhammad, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old. [1], others say she was betrothed to Muhammad at the age of 6 or 7; [2] and she was 9 when she had a small marriage ceremony. [3]
Deleted content
Response in Hindu right media
According to a synopsis of 'Hindu right media' by Unnati Sharma in ThePrint; an editorial of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated journal Panchjanya, the erstwhile spokesperson Nupur Sharma and her family are being threatened with rape, death when Sharma had only repeated what Islamic preacher Zakir Naik too had said earlier; where as other Muslim leader threatened of iconoclasm against Shivling.(Sic) [5]
Academic response
According to Ahmet T. Kuru, it is not possible to know Aisha's factual age at the time of marriage, Kuru says Sharma used a single narration, of a hadith record, which says Aisha was 9 years old by the time she got married, and that some Muslims do accept since child marriages were common in premodern times. Kuru says, but Sharma ignored alternative Muslim explanation that Aisha might have been either 18 or 19 years old at the time of marriage. [6]- Mossad3 ( talk) 19:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
References
... Former BJP national spokesperson Nupur Sharma only dared to repeat what Islamic preacher Zakir Naik had said, read an editorial in Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated journal Panchjanya, referring to the former's suspension from primary membership of the party over her remarks on Prophet Muhammad. .. "A BJP spokesperson and her family were threatened with rape, death because she dared to repeat what Islamic preacher Zakir Naik has been saying. On the other hand, a Muslim leader says that if he had known about the Shivling, he would have broken it already," it added. ..
.. According to a hadith record, Aisha was 9 years old when she got married. Some Muslims accept this record and see it normal for a pre-modern marriage, whereas other Muslims believe that Aisha was either 18 or 19 years old by referring to other records. It is not possible to know the true facts of Aisha's age. As Islamic scholar Khaled Abou El Fadl stresses, "we do not know and will never know" them. Sharma thus used a single narration, while ignoring alternative Muslim explanations, in her remarks. ..
Link to SRL Geelalani, point to wrong page… it must be corrected ASAP 103.46.203.235 ( talk) 19:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
URL to SRL geelamani points at a wrong web page. Please correct it ASAP 103.46.203.235 ( talk) 19:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved by silent consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 14:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Nupur Sharma (politician) → Nupur Sharma – She is only notable person with the name Nupur Sharma so this page should be move to Nupur Sharma. Contributor008 ( talk) 11:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To the lead and "Comments about Muhammad" section (just after where it says, ".....regarding the age of Muhammad's wife Aisha at the time of their marriage and consummation of the marriage."), please add, "However, she was merely quoting from the hadith. [1] [2]" - it has been accepted in the 2022 Muhammad remarks controversy article. 2406:7400:98:395:6853:A3AE:E237:482B ( talk) 18:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fails Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event ( WP:BLP1E ) Venkat TL ( talk) 07:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
An RfC closed in 2021 found Most users believe that AfD should be used to settle controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting." [2] Since at least three users have opposed the blanking [3] [4] [5], not including the user who created the article and others who have edited the article in the meantime, its quite obvious that the blanking here is "controversial". Please use AfD to get consensus. VR talk 05:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
"should stubify the section on Nupur_Sharma_(politician)#Comments_on_Prophet_Muhammad and only include no more than 1 paragraph that she made comments which attracted controversy and she got expelled. Yes the main link to the article can be retained"and Venkat TL agreed that
" I agree with your suggestion about summarizing the controversy section on Nupur Bio."Captain Jack Sparrow ( talk) 09:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
You cannot claim to have "consensus" without even receiving input from the largest contributor of the page" reeks of WP:OWN and you restored content that has very less or nothing to do with Nupur such as the declaration by Mufti of Oman. It should be removed. The details about the controversy that are targeting more than just Nupur should be covered in the main controversy article. Captain Jack Sparrow ( talk) 11:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Alt News denied any responsibility for the reaction the viewers after watching the video clip." to "Alt News denied any responsibility for the reaction by the viewers after watching the video clip." ("by" has been edited in the corrected sentence) EruOfArda ( talk) 12:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
203.192.243.5 ( talk) 18:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Why are her remarks being deleted? Is there no verifiable source. People come to Wikipedia for information and there's barely anything here on the actual crux of the controversy. SuhitaSaha1205 ( talk) 16:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
There are umpteen sources cited in the article, all of which call him "Prophet Muhammad". That includes CNN/Reuers. Can people please refrain from WP:OR and stick to sources? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Please provide the full name of "S. A. R. Geelani". A contributor suggested that his name is "Syed Abdul Rahman Geelani". Is that correct? Mksword ( talk) 19:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
@ LearnIndology This version after your trimming is severely lacking in content. I believe excessive amount of content was removed that left the article lacking. I suggest all participants to discuss here what content can possibly be removed instead of edit warring. Venkat TL ( talk) 11:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Somebody added this Washington Post citation
What is this supposed to be for? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 13:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Ghodbunder, can you explain which source justifies your addition: made in response to the "continuous insult and disregard" towards the Hindu deity
Shiva.
[1]
[2]
made
here? --
Kautilya3 (
talk)
16:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
References
The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[2] the contribution.[3]I am asking for a quotation that demonstrates that it "directly supports" your content. It is a reasonable request, and I am sure the admins will agree. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I am not editing any article on current S. Asian politics and do not plan to edit this article to any considerable extent either. But, there exists a few glaring issues which might be taken care of by ECP:
which later developed into a controversyetc. TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
We need better sources for birth verification - place and date/year. OneIndia is hardly an RS and BusinessStandard ref doesn't verify it — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 06:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Opindia website mentions her as the Editor, OpIndia.com since October 2017 as .Want to add this to the lead.She is the Editor has not resigned as of now. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Please clarify that this is "Temporary suspension pending investigation", basically hogwash till the matter is in news. This is standard modus operandi in BJP with several members getting their membership reinstated and suspension revoked along with getting party ticket for election in a few months. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
"Described as brash and articulate
" possible
WP:NPOV violation in the lead?
I know it's cited as being from a BBC article, but I think it needs to be clear such that no one can infer that Wikipedia is taking a position. ( 👋 • 🗣 • ✍️) 13:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Kautilya3 you have reverted me twice here and here and made an accusation of "whitewashing" for sourcing content from a more reliable source. Please explain your action. -- Webberbrad007 ( talk) 07:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Webberbrad007, please don't gaslight us. I didn't revert a "source". I reverted your free-wheeling rewrite of the existing content with no explanation. Hee is the existing content. Please tell us what part of it needs to be modified and why.
The BJP supporters, including some popular politicians, rallied behind Nupur Sharma and criticised the party and the government for buckling under international pressure. Hashtags such as "#ShameOnBJP" and "#ISupportNupurSharma" trended on Twitter in her support. [1] [2] [3]
References
- ^ Sheikh Saaliq (AP) (6 June 2022), "Muslim nations slam India over insulting remarks about Islam", The Wasington Post,
Modi's party also faced anger from some of its own supporters, but it was for a different reason. Many Hindu nationalists posted comments on social media saying the government was buckling under international pressure.- ^ Geeta Pandey (7 June 2022), "Nupur Sharma: The Indian woman behind offensive Prophet Muhammad comments", BBC News,
But since her suspension, support has also been growing for the beleaguered former BJP spokesperson - hashtags such as #ISupportNupurSharma and #TakeBackNupurSharma have trended daily on social media, with tens of thousands praising her.- ^ "Right-wing ecosystem turns on BJP for suspending Nupur Sharma", The Telegraph (India), 7 June 2022,
While many young BJP cadres and leaders expressed their disgust privately at the action against Sharma, Delhi leader Kapil Mishra — accused of delivering hate speeches in the run-up to the February 2020 riots — expressed his displeasure in public.
Even if we take your word that you were "replacing the existing source with RSPSS", there was no explanation of why this was being done. The WP:ONUS is on you to argue for your revised content (and, at the same time, the deletion of the existing content). -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Twitter hashtags like #ShameOnBJP trended after Ms. Sharma’s suspension with many prominent BJP supporters, though not officially members of the BJP, expressing the sentiment that Ms. Sharma and Mr. Kumar had been abandoned by the party at a time when Ms. Sharma had also received death threats over her remarks.
though not officially members of the BJPthen true? The text in the article is fine as it is. Hemantha ( talk) 13:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Webberbrad007 ( talk) 23:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[The BJP MP extending support to Nupur Sharma] said, “These non-believers have always done so. Kamlesh Tiwari said something and he was killed. Someone else [Nupur Sharma] said something and they also received a death threat. They distort our gods and goddess and make films about them. They have been doing this for years… That shows their mentality.”
Ghodbunder, Ipdesign1 why do you believe that "Controversial" doesn't apply to these remarks? The remarks have clearly created a controversy. -- Webberbrad007 ( talk) 14:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Info on her mother's origin seems coming very abruptly, Idk if that has any relevance as of now ?
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 15:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently an unresolved dispute: Should we include the point about some BJP members supporting Nupur Sharma and objecting to her suspension given that she has received death threats? Webberbrad007 ( talk) 22:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC) This is specified in The Hindu article here which states:
Twitter hashtags like #ShameOnBJP trended after Ms. Sharma’s suspension with many prominent BJP supporters, though not officially members of the BJP, expressing the sentiment that Ms. Sharma and Mr. Kumar had been abandoned by the party at a time when Ms. Sharma had also received death threats over her remarks.
The Hindu is included as the Newspaper of record for India in WP:RSPSS and is generally reliable list.
Please select from Proposal A or Proposal B (or some clear equivalent) below with a brief explanation of why or why not. The current wording is Proposal A and is in the Comments about Muhammad section.
Many BJP supporters, including some BJP politicians, rallied behind Nupur Sharma and criticised the party and the government for abandoning her and buckling under international pressure. Hashtags such as "#ShameOnBJP" and "#ISupportNupurSharma" trended on Twitter. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Many BJP supporters, including some BJP politicians, rallied behind Nupur Sharma and criticised the party and the government for abandoning her at a time when she had received death threats over her remarks. They were also critical of the party and the government for buckling under international pressure. Hashtags such as "#ShameOnBJP" and "#ISupportNupurSharma" trended on Twitter. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Webberbrad007 ( talk) 22:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
References
Modi's party also faced anger from some of its own supporters, but it was for a different reason. Many Hindu nationalists posted comments on social media saying the government was buckling under international pressure.
But since her suspension, support has also been growing for the beleaguered former BJP spokesperson - hashtags such as #ISupportNupurSharma and #TakeBackNupurSharma have trended daily on social media, with tens of thousands praising her.
While many young BJP cadres and leaders expressed their disgust privately at the action against Sharma, Delhi leader Kapil Mishra — accused of delivering hate speeches in the run-up to the February 2020 riots — expressed his displeasure in public.
[The BJP MP extending support to Nupur Sharma] said, “These non-believers have always done so. Kamlesh Tiwari said something and he was killed. Someone else [Nupur Sharma] said something and they also received a death threat. They distort our gods and goddess and make films about them. They have been doing this for years… That shows their mentality.”
Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. It tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government.
There is consensus that The Hindu is generally reliable and should be treated as a newspaper of record. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline.
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
THE SECTION THAT QUOTES AS " COMMENTS ABOUT MUHAMMAD " I WANT TO CHANGE IT TO " COMMENTS ABOUT PROPHET MUHAMMAD" Sahir01 ( talk) 14:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Please help to expand the new article. Venkat TL ( talk) 19:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add this, "
Children in madrasas are taught that punishment for blasphemy is beheading according to Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan, speaking on the Udaipur killing.
[1]
[2]
", this, "The Supreme Court said Nupur Sharma's outburst is responsible for the unfortunate murder of a tailor at Udaipur.
[3]
" and this, "The Udaipur court transferred tailor Kanhaiya Lal's murder case to the
National Investigation Agency (NIA).
[4]-
Mossad3 (
talk)
15:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. Supreme court comments are undue. Kanhaiya Lal is not relevant here as there is no mention in the article. Khan's comments may perhaps be discussed, I don't know.
Hemantha (
talk)
16:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)::So please add Khan's comments to the article.-
Mossad3 (
talk)
17:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please also add: "
A shop owner in Amravati was most likely killed for a post supporting Nupur Sharma
."
[1]-
Mossad3 (
talk)
16:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit extended-protected}}
template. The same response as above.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
12:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)References
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The
Aisha article says, "Some traditional hadith sources state that Aisha was betrothed to Muhammad at the age of 6 or 7;[12] other sources say she was 9 when she had a small marriage ceremony
" and so that sentence should be added to the lead so that our readers know why she said what she said (Nupur Sharma).-
Mossad3 (
talk)
01:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
edit extended-protected}}
template.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
12:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Some traditional hadith sources state that Aisha was six years of age when she was married to Muhammad, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old. [1], others say she was betrothed to Muhammad at the age of 6 or 7; [2] and she was 9 when she had a small marriage ceremony. [3]
Deleted content
Response in Hindu right media
According to a synopsis of 'Hindu right media' by Unnati Sharma in ThePrint; an editorial of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated journal Panchjanya, the erstwhile spokesperson Nupur Sharma and her family are being threatened with rape, death when Sharma had only repeated what Islamic preacher Zakir Naik too had said earlier; where as other Muslim leader threatened of iconoclasm against Shivling.(Sic) [5]
Academic response
According to Ahmet T. Kuru, it is not possible to know Aisha's factual age at the time of marriage, Kuru says Sharma used a single narration, of a hadith record, which says Aisha was 9 years old by the time she got married, and that some Muslims do accept since child marriages were common in premodern times. Kuru says, but Sharma ignored alternative Muslim explanation that Aisha might have been either 18 or 19 years old at the time of marriage. [6]- Mossad3 ( talk) 19:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
References
... Former BJP national spokesperson Nupur Sharma only dared to repeat what Islamic preacher Zakir Naik had said, read an editorial in Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated journal Panchjanya, referring to the former's suspension from primary membership of the party over her remarks on Prophet Muhammad. .. "A BJP spokesperson and her family were threatened with rape, death because she dared to repeat what Islamic preacher Zakir Naik has been saying. On the other hand, a Muslim leader says that if he had known about the Shivling, he would have broken it already," it added. ..
.. According to a hadith record, Aisha was 9 years old when she got married. Some Muslims accept this record and see it normal for a pre-modern marriage, whereas other Muslims believe that Aisha was either 18 or 19 years old by referring to other records. It is not possible to know the true facts of Aisha's age. As Islamic scholar Khaled Abou El Fadl stresses, "we do not know and will never know" them. Sharma thus used a single narration, while ignoring alternative Muslim explanations, in her remarks. ..
Link to SRL Geelalani, point to wrong page… it must be corrected ASAP 103.46.203.235 ( talk) 19:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Nupur Sharma (politician) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
URL to SRL geelamani points at a wrong web page. Please correct it ASAP 103.46.203.235 ( talk) 19:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved by silent consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 14:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Nupur Sharma (politician) → Nupur Sharma – She is only notable person with the name Nupur Sharma so this page should be move to Nupur Sharma. Contributor008 ( talk) 11:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To the lead and "Comments about Muhammad" section (just after where it says, ".....regarding the age of Muhammad's wife Aisha at the time of their marriage and consummation of the marriage."), please add, "However, she was merely quoting from the hadith. [1] [2]" - it has been accepted in the 2022 Muhammad remarks controversy article. 2406:7400:98:395:6853:A3AE:E237:482B ( talk) 18:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)