This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking / Software This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: history watch purge Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Answer question about Same-origin_policy Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

I certainly think it is an important, notable topic in real life Microsoft dominated IT world security. I just found this, let's see iuf it answers my questions.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.36.71.28 ( talk) 17:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I completely agree with the above. This should be expanded by the knowledgeable however.-- 24.76.90.75 ( talk) 16:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The article shortly contained quite an amount of good text, which was plagiarized from this book. It was all removed (good), but the book might serve as source for self-generated content to start. -- Methossant ( talk) 17:28, 24 February 2013 (UTC) reply

@ Kvng: thanks for entering the contest...though the article is so short its hard to see how what is now the lead is a concise summary of the rest of the article. Can this be expanded at all? Similarly Ring protection is good but would be better if expanded a little and had some inline references. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 14:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC) reply