 | The contents of the Nuke (video games) page were merged into Glossary of video game terms on September 15, 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Are modern wafare nukes actually "nukes"? it doesn't actually damage anything, only ends the game. -- Fulizer ( talk) 08:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it does fit the definition of a game-ending or nearly-so super weapon. However, it shouldn't be the first reference, nor should it be grouped with RTS and turn-based games, as it is neither. Bakkster Man ( talk) 20:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
What I meant was that the descriptionof it was incomplete and exists on this page only because of a craze for the game, I personally do not consider it a notable use of the phrase "nuke".-- Fulizer ( talk) 10:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
The article, as I understand, describes "Nuke" as gaming terminology, as defined in its MMORPG and Strategy counterparts, and not "in gaming" in general. How would a single spell in one game be of any relevance, especially as not more than one sentence can be written about it? -- Scottie theNerd 14:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- The only real nuke that I could think of in FF is Knights of the Round. Even so, I've never really heard the term "nuke" used towards any FF spells (or SP RPG's for that matter) [but then again I dont run heavily in those circles] Dogabutila ( talk) 08:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:First-person (gaming) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| The contents of the Nuke (video games) page were merged into Glossary of video game terms on September 15, 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Are modern wafare nukes actually "nukes"? it doesn't actually damage anything, only ends the game. -- Fulizer ( talk) 08:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it does fit the definition of a game-ending or nearly-so super weapon. However, it shouldn't be the first reference, nor should it be grouped with RTS and turn-based games, as it is neither. Bakkster Man ( talk) 20:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
What I meant was that the descriptionof it was incomplete and exists on this page only because of a craze for the game, I personally do not consider it a notable use of the phrase "nuke".-- Fulizer ( talk) 10:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
The article, as I understand, describes "Nuke" as gaming terminology, as defined in its MMORPG and Strategy counterparts, and not "in gaming" in general. How would a single spell in one game be of any relevance, especially as not more than one sentence can be written about it? -- Scottie theNerd 14:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- The only real nuke that I could think of in FF is Knights of the Round. Even so, I've never really heard the term "nuke" used towards any FF spells (or SP RPG's for that matter) [but then again I dont run heavily in those circles] Dogabutila ( talk) 08:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:First-person (gaming) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)