![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
"ns-2 build of 2009 is not actively maintained (and is not being accepted for journal publications)" This is a tough statement. Who decides what is accepted for journal publications? In fact, the majority of academic publications that refer to network simulations use ns-2, I have never seen any academic publication that was based on ns-3. I suggest to remove this statement, or possibly replace it by something like the following:
ns-2 build of 2009 is not actively maintained, but (in 2014) still the dominant simulation envrionemnt for simulations of communication protocols and networks in the academic world
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans.perot ( talk • contribs) 08:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
The "disadvantages" part looks like complete rubbish. It takes 2 years??! 194.90.46.228 ( talk)
ns3 would appear to be no longer in a state of development (at least no more than ns2). -- 193.60.83.241 ( talk) 23:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Comments below moved here from the article, - TB ( talk) 20:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Does nam not provide that GUI? - User:147.83.35.173 ( User talk:147.83.35.173)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
"ns-2 build of 2009 is not actively maintained (and is not being accepted for journal publications)" This is a tough statement. Who decides what is accepted for journal publications? In fact, the majority of academic publications that refer to network simulations use ns-2, I have never seen any academic publication that was based on ns-3. I suggest to remove this statement, or possibly replace it by something like the following:
ns-2 build of 2009 is not actively maintained, but (in 2014) still the dominant simulation envrionemnt for simulations of communication protocols and networks in the academic world
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans.perot ( talk • contribs) 08:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
The "disadvantages" part looks like complete rubbish. It takes 2 years??! 194.90.46.228 ( talk)
ns3 would appear to be no longer in a state of development (at least no more than ns2). -- 193.60.83.241 ( talk) 23:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Comments below moved here from the article, - TB ( talk) 20:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Does nam not provide that GUI? - User:147.83.35.173 ( User talk:147.83.35.173)