This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Not That Far Away article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
It's been long determined to be notable. The reviews are professional and they've had contact with artists and other notable people in the music industry. The site's link has been featured on CMT, GAC, and AOL's The Boot websites. This
link has 411 hits for The 9513 and most are related to the site.
User:TenPoundHammer might have more on why's it notable if you need more info. --
Caldorwards4 (
talk)
09:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Not really. There's just no positive reviews of the song from reputable sources that have been added. If you can find one that's worthy of inclusion, please feel free to add it. But the inclusion of a negative review is not inappropriate if there is a lack of positive feedback. That's just how it goes.
CloversMallRat (
talk)
22:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)reply
So? That has no bearing on whether the review should be included on Wikipedia or not. It is perfectly fine for inclusion. End of story.
CloversMallRat (
talk)
02:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes, it did. If a song debuts at #58 in its first week and then doesn't move up to a new peak, then it peaked in its first week. It doesn't matter how many weeks it spent on the chart at that point; its trivial.
CloversMallRat (
talk)
15:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Not That Far Away article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
It's been long determined to be notable. The reviews are professional and they've had contact with artists and other notable people in the music industry. The site's link has been featured on CMT, GAC, and AOL's The Boot websites. This
link has 411 hits for The 9513 and most are related to the site.
User:TenPoundHammer might have more on why's it notable if you need more info. --
Caldorwards4 (
talk)
09:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Not really. There's just no positive reviews of the song from reputable sources that have been added. If you can find one that's worthy of inclusion, please feel free to add it. But the inclusion of a negative review is not inappropriate if there is a lack of positive feedback. That's just how it goes.
CloversMallRat (
talk)
22:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)reply
So? That has no bearing on whether the review should be included on Wikipedia or not. It is perfectly fine for inclusion. End of story.
CloversMallRat (
talk)
02:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes, it did. If a song debuts at #58 in its first week and then doesn't move up to a new peak, then it peaked in its first week. It doesn't matter how many weeks it spent on the chart at that point; its trivial.
CloversMallRat (
talk)
15:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)reply