From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This seems wrong. The conjugate closure should give the union of all conjugacy classes containing S, not the smallest normal subgroup containing S. For example, take S = { x } with x != 0, then the conjugate closure of S in (R,+) is just S. However S is not a subgroup of R. The statement would be true if S contained the identity however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.204.99.5 ( talk) 22:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC) reply

As usual, the question is, what do independent reliable sources say? Deltahedron ( talk) 17:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This seems wrong. The conjugate closure should give the union of all conjugacy classes containing S, not the smallest normal subgroup containing S. For example, take S = { x } with x != 0, then the conjugate closure of S in (R,+) is just S. However S is not a subgroup of R. The statement would be true if S contained the identity however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.204.99.5 ( talk) 22:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC) reply

As usual, the question is, what do independent reliable sources say? Deltahedron ( talk) 17:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook