This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nokia N95 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You can find in the same site of Nokia that it's mention: Source http://forum.nokia.com/devices/N95
Dual CPU CPU Type: ARM 12 CPU Clock Rate: 342 MHz 3D Graphics HW Accelerator
Expanding the information you can find that the real cpu is not a ARM1 but a ARM11 based (OMAP2420 more a "suite" rather a single cpu). Source : http://www.imgtec.com/
Anyways, the Dual CPU is not a 2x432mhz but a 332mhz cpu - 220mhz DSP cpu.
For some strange reasons to put the specifications of CPU about cellphone are usually removed, may be because this information can be confidential (in fact it is not) or another kind of reasons.
Another note that shit phone (go away fanboys) is a 6xx mhz but in a different kind of architecture (also based in ARM11) so it's not trivial to say that Iphone is more fast without a decent benchmark but Apple currently dissalow it so for a while nobody can determine which cellphone is the more faster. -- Magallanes 00:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Being a anti-global supporter of national industry I oppose CHines manufactured Western products. Does anyone know here this phone is manufactured? Thanks! Koalorka 23:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
there are several factories that used to make N95's. by the product code you are able to tell which one. There are lists on internet. anyway I don't recall but I think malasya, finland, cezch republik and saudi arabia were among.
When I think of N95, I think of a NIOSH certification level for respiratory protection (masks). Therefore, I wonder if it's appropriate to have a redirect that goes to this page. I know there isn't an article for respiratory protection (or at least I havent found it), but still-- {{SUBST:User:Coryma}} 23:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
So someone added this in anyway, even without an article to go to. Why? I disagree, as the N95 is surely (going to be) more popular than some mask certification level thing. 87.75.140.141 17:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The Nokia specs page for the N95 says a maximum of 2GB is supported - and given that the 4GB MicroSD cards are actually a different format ( SDHC) and not backwards compatible with normal SD card slots, it seems unlikely that this will change. FWIW, this would apply to anything else that uses MicroSD (or other forms of SD) cards too, including other Nokia handsets. Wibbble 01:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I can confirm that an N95 will take a Sandisk 4GB MicroSD card just fine 80.229.160.127 20:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
I've edited the article to just say 'microSD card' and not list any capacity. It's not wikipedia's place to inform buyers or anything like that - since this is an issue under debate, I think it's best to just avoid it entirely in the encyclopedia. People looking for other users' experience with the N95 can go to forums, discussion boards, and review sites. Wibbble 23:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC) just try my n95 with lastest firmware update,it worked great with 8gb scandisk microsd carf KKIO report from china —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.27.94.188 ( talk) 21:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Please just stop it. I've a 32gb microsdhc card working on my N95. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.214.214.112 ( talk) 10:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
There was debate before the release as to whether FOTA would be included as a feature. In the specs list it still says "May include FOTA". So now that the phone is out, can anyone confirm whether or not this feature is actually included??? 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Is information available on exactly what the N95 is able to play back?
As in, it supports H.264 but at what profile (basic, extended, main, high) and what level (1.2, 1.3, 2,..)?
84.202.105.83 23:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
My testing seems to indicate that B-frames and CABAC isn't supported, guess that means main profile isn't supported. It should support streaming, so it would make sense for the decoder to support extended. Not tested, though. Looks like bitrates go to at least 1400Kbps, so level is probably somewhere between 1.3 and 2. 85.167.139.132 13:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I have rewritten most of the article and added more information. Also, I have the N95, so if there are any questions regarding the phone, feel free to ask.-- Wiki Fanatic | Talk 21:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I have this phone also, but I am new to wikipedia and am not feeling bold enough to edit quite yet. I was wondering if the detail about the iPhone and its internet connectivity is really appropriate for this page? Im a bit of a video codec nerd so I'll try to get more details on the H.264 profile(s) the N95 supports, along with other info. I agree NPOV could be improved on a tad. There's a few functionality facts I could add but am I correct to think I should source such facts at the same time that I add them? SteveElbows 06:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm gonna be bold here and improve the whole article. If I'm not mistaken, wikipedia articles should include cites to reliable sources, not to some blogs or known-for-no one tech sites (there are quite a lot more reliable sources) to call it "iPhone killer". These products are too different to be killers of one another. Next, almost all mentioned features (except for GPS and 5Mp camera) comes from software platform (s60 v3 fp1 s60 platform) and not a unique or important features (store pictures and video in the internet services? is there any smartphone unable to do this?) If you wanna describe those features, start article s60 3rd edition fp1. Too many typos, by the way... Is there any need to place Pricing here? Will it be interesting for somebody in 2009 for example? Or someone gonna update it now-and-again? Dreambringer 12:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
There were a lot of POV's (like positioning Nseries as "flagship" - who said this? and what about Eseries?), so before undoing to previous versions, let's discuss it. Dreambringer 13:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
No serious page doing a balanced presentation of the N95 would be complete without a comment about the battery life. I got my N95 two days ago, charged it for 24 hours, and started using it. After 6 hours it was out of battery.
My 6 hours of battery life time is far away from what Nokia promises.
I will have to start researching the process; I believe gersbo.dk/2007/05/nine-tweaks-that-will-improve-nokia-n95-battery-life-by-328.html is a good guide for that.
look at this signature string from broadbandreport: Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 NokiaN95/11.0.026; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
shouldn't we tell people about "Nokia's cooperation with Apple, as the Series 60 browser will use the same open source components, WebCore and JavaScriptCore, that Apple uses in its popular Safari Internet browser"?
http://press.nokia.com/PR/200506/998214_5.html
How?
I may have misunderstood, but if tethering with the N95 is anything like the Sony Ericsson K800i, just a simple Bluetooth connection to a notebook is all it takes to use it as (essentially) a Bluetooth HSDPA modem. The guy I spoke to in the T-Mobile store here in the UK also mentioned being able to connect it wirelessly to my notebook. Hope this helps. Gentian Hush 20:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
There's an application called JoikuSpot that'll let you do that. 213.140.6.119 ( talk) 00:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
can we please have some info about price? A ballpark figure will do, after all, Wikipedia is a great resource used by people worldwide because of its very detailed articles. 203.214.98.123 10:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
As of today it's being sold at Fnac stores in Portugal at 300 euro.-- 81.193.116.223 ( talk) 10:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Should the article make mention of the recent news of the upcomming US configuration of the N95?
The referencing for the US version was all second and third hand, and certainly nothing confirming or announcing anything. I've removed it for the time being, but as soon as it has been announced and there's reliable sources for it (ie, Nokia or a network), it should get added back in. I think it's worth adding that just because it's doing the rounds on the rumour mill doesn't mean it'll get released - not all phones that pop up as 'coming soon' actually make it to market. Wibbble 02:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
FCC documents for the certification of the US variant are available so that 'coming soon' claim is looking very strong. Although I agree it shouldn't be included in the article until an official announcement from Nokia. What I don't get is why references to the 8GB version are being repeatedly deleted when it definitely has been announced and Nokia has even published tech specs on it on their website. 84.202.176.97 17:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Official specs for the N95 NAM are now up on forum nokia, so it seems it is time to include it in the article. I suppose the best way is to expand the tech specs table to include the differences between the original, the 8GB and the NAM? UnAimedPlayer 11:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Since Nokia - AFAIK - still does not publish changelogs for software updates, or information on when they are released, or which product codes have updates available, it's not possible to have reliable references for this section. It's also going to tend towards userguide/how-to type content (which isn't appropriate for wikipedia, see: WP:NOT#INFO and WP:NOT#GUIDE). I've trimmed it a bit, and if no one can find references for what's left, I plan to remove it. Wibbble 11:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Given the dazzling argument here against the entire section, I agree with that slightly incoherent IP user and I'm going to remove the entire section as unreferenced. If anyone can find reliable, verifiable, references, and can justify the whole section under WP:NOT as mentioned above, speak up here before adding it back in. Wibbble 07:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
The firmware generation number given in the Acceleromator section would appear to be wrong, I was intersted in the automatic orientation which mine doesn't do and checked my firmware, which was v20.something, the article sugests that it is upto v30.0.015 but checking on Nokia's website the latest is v21.0.016, this maybe down to my location or the age of my phone as it is the earliest. Whichever it is the article indicates that there is only one firmware version.
Yakacm ( talk) 08:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
It should be fairly easy to find references for most of this article from Forum Nokia ( http://forum.nokia.com) and the Nokia website. Anyone up for hunting them down? Wibbble 07:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the section about the Music Edition of the N95 for a number of reasons:
Let's hold off and not jump the gun on this one - of the speculation I've read (and it is at this point ONLY speculation) the closest release date anywhere will be the end of Q4 2007 - at least 4 months away. I'm sure we'll hear something reliable from Nokia in the mean time. Cheers, ABVS1936 05:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Where did you get this information: "128MB RAM, up from 64MB." It's not listed on the side with technical specifications, and I can't find it in any announcement news. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bateyes ( talk • contribs) 06:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I suppose it won't be 6 months since it's just a revision, but nevertheless it should be mentioned if available. 12.28.109.82 23:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Unlike most mobile phones (Motorola, SonyEricsson, BlackBerry, and others) that feature a mini-USB connector, N95 do not charge its battery with the USB connector. It requires the user to carry a separate power supply. This is a drawback that should be advertised. Xor74 09:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Forget assumptions, advertising or arguing terms.. You are right the articles would get long if it included everything, however instead of arguing about mini-USB or micro-USB how about conceding that this is a truly valid nugget of information. IF you use this as a business phone then it is likely you will have information on it instead of a USB key, however as a business use phone it will also get drained quickly of power... thus it is equally valid information that IN USE the phone will need a USB cable and power pack. This information is just as valid as the type of GPS chipset or the size of the battery pack as it is an inherent ability of the phone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyclical ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Can I ask, why the image changes? The current images are called "official" images of either the n95 or the n95-8Gb, but where exactly did these images come from? And why change from the documented free images that were there in the first place? ABVS1936 ( talk) 10:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
How many have been sold so far and whats the market penetration? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.24.70.2 ( talk) 07:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Can someone please add links to the Predecessor and successor phones? I find those links very helpful when looking at phone articles.-- 88.18.131.205 ( talk) 17:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Insert non-formatted text here
I`ve come to realize that the Internet is full of sites, videos, and reviews claiming that the Chinese versions of the N95 are bad quality clones(not developed by Nokia). This wouldn't be much of an issue if it wasn't for the fact that I haven't found any sites stating otherwise besides this article. Maybe there's actually a official version that gets confused with the clone or the article is right and the so called "clone" is actually official but people around the Internet just didn't bothered to make some research before ranting about how their "fake" Chinese N95 doesn't have Wi-fi. So, is there any reliable source that these phones are really from Nokia? 190.176.227.7 ( talk) 23:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
The text of this article refers to "the N95 3G" when talking about the North American version. This appears to be causing confusion as, as far as I'm aware this is not the correct name of the phone and of course all the previous versions supported standard (WCDMA2100) 3G. I believe this should be changed to refer to the correct model number. Jckcip ( talk) 00:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I saw that too; I reworded the paragraph. -- Hlorri ( talk) 23:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
how do i acces internet on my n95 phone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.138.1.219 ( talk) 11:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I think the change/addition near "being connected for only a few minutes" by "17:35, 19 September 2010 by 110.36.63.254" should be reviewed. -- Mortense ( talk) 08:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
They should make new version of Nokia N95 silver the same shape with better camera quality 10 Megapixels , Internal Flash Memory 16 gb , Memory card slot micro 36 gb, long screen...
How big's the chip? 1/1.8" maybe? Great quality captures; does anyone have the info? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.10.37 ( talk) 23:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nokia N95. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nokia N95 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You can find in the same site of Nokia that it's mention: Source http://forum.nokia.com/devices/N95
Dual CPU CPU Type: ARM 12 CPU Clock Rate: 342 MHz 3D Graphics HW Accelerator
Expanding the information you can find that the real cpu is not a ARM1 but a ARM11 based (OMAP2420 more a "suite" rather a single cpu). Source : http://www.imgtec.com/
Anyways, the Dual CPU is not a 2x432mhz but a 332mhz cpu - 220mhz DSP cpu.
For some strange reasons to put the specifications of CPU about cellphone are usually removed, may be because this information can be confidential (in fact it is not) or another kind of reasons.
Another note that shit phone (go away fanboys) is a 6xx mhz but in a different kind of architecture (also based in ARM11) so it's not trivial to say that Iphone is more fast without a decent benchmark but Apple currently dissalow it so for a while nobody can determine which cellphone is the more faster. -- Magallanes 00:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Being a anti-global supporter of national industry I oppose CHines manufactured Western products. Does anyone know here this phone is manufactured? Thanks! Koalorka 23:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
there are several factories that used to make N95's. by the product code you are able to tell which one. There are lists on internet. anyway I don't recall but I think malasya, finland, cezch republik and saudi arabia were among.
When I think of N95, I think of a NIOSH certification level for respiratory protection (masks). Therefore, I wonder if it's appropriate to have a redirect that goes to this page. I know there isn't an article for respiratory protection (or at least I havent found it), but still-- {{SUBST:User:Coryma}} 23:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
So someone added this in anyway, even without an article to go to. Why? I disagree, as the N95 is surely (going to be) more popular than some mask certification level thing. 87.75.140.141 17:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The Nokia specs page for the N95 says a maximum of 2GB is supported - and given that the 4GB MicroSD cards are actually a different format ( SDHC) and not backwards compatible with normal SD card slots, it seems unlikely that this will change. FWIW, this would apply to anything else that uses MicroSD (or other forms of SD) cards too, including other Nokia handsets. Wibbble 01:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I can confirm that an N95 will take a Sandisk 4GB MicroSD card just fine 80.229.160.127 20:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
I've edited the article to just say 'microSD card' and not list any capacity. It's not wikipedia's place to inform buyers or anything like that - since this is an issue under debate, I think it's best to just avoid it entirely in the encyclopedia. People looking for other users' experience with the N95 can go to forums, discussion boards, and review sites. Wibbble 23:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC) just try my n95 with lastest firmware update,it worked great with 8gb scandisk microsd carf KKIO report from china —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.27.94.188 ( talk) 21:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Please just stop it. I've a 32gb microsdhc card working on my N95. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.214.214.112 ( talk) 10:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
There was debate before the release as to whether FOTA would be included as a feature. In the specs list it still says "May include FOTA". So now that the phone is out, can anyone confirm whether or not this feature is actually included??? 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Is information available on exactly what the N95 is able to play back?
As in, it supports H.264 but at what profile (basic, extended, main, high) and what level (1.2, 1.3, 2,..)?
84.202.105.83 23:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
My testing seems to indicate that B-frames and CABAC isn't supported, guess that means main profile isn't supported. It should support streaming, so it would make sense for the decoder to support extended. Not tested, though. Looks like bitrates go to at least 1400Kbps, so level is probably somewhere between 1.3 and 2. 85.167.139.132 13:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I have rewritten most of the article and added more information. Also, I have the N95, so if there are any questions regarding the phone, feel free to ask.-- Wiki Fanatic | Talk 21:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I have this phone also, but I am new to wikipedia and am not feeling bold enough to edit quite yet. I was wondering if the detail about the iPhone and its internet connectivity is really appropriate for this page? Im a bit of a video codec nerd so I'll try to get more details on the H.264 profile(s) the N95 supports, along with other info. I agree NPOV could be improved on a tad. There's a few functionality facts I could add but am I correct to think I should source such facts at the same time that I add them? SteveElbows 06:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm gonna be bold here and improve the whole article. If I'm not mistaken, wikipedia articles should include cites to reliable sources, not to some blogs or known-for-no one tech sites (there are quite a lot more reliable sources) to call it "iPhone killer". These products are too different to be killers of one another. Next, almost all mentioned features (except for GPS and 5Mp camera) comes from software platform (s60 v3 fp1 s60 platform) and not a unique or important features (store pictures and video in the internet services? is there any smartphone unable to do this?) If you wanna describe those features, start article s60 3rd edition fp1. Too many typos, by the way... Is there any need to place Pricing here? Will it be interesting for somebody in 2009 for example? Or someone gonna update it now-and-again? Dreambringer 12:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
There were a lot of POV's (like positioning Nseries as "flagship" - who said this? and what about Eseries?), so before undoing to previous versions, let's discuss it. Dreambringer 13:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
No serious page doing a balanced presentation of the N95 would be complete without a comment about the battery life. I got my N95 two days ago, charged it for 24 hours, and started using it. After 6 hours it was out of battery.
My 6 hours of battery life time is far away from what Nokia promises.
I will have to start researching the process; I believe gersbo.dk/2007/05/nine-tweaks-that-will-improve-nokia-n95-battery-life-by-328.html is a good guide for that.
look at this signature string from broadbandreport: Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 NokiaN95/11.0.026; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
shouldn't we tell people about "Nokia's cooperation with Apple, as the Series 60 browser will use the same open source components, WebCore and JavaScriptCore, that Apple uses in its popular Safari Internet browser"?
http://press.nokia.com/PR/200506/998214_5.html
How?
I may have misunderstood, but if tethering with the N95 is anything like the Sony Ericsson K800i, just a simple Bluetooth connection to a notebook is all it takes to use it as (essentially) a Bluetooth HSDPA modem. The guy I spoke to in the T-Mobile store here in the UK also mentioned being able to connect it wirelessly to my notebook. Hope this helps. Gentian Hush 20:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
There's an application called JoikuSpot that'll let you do that. 213.140.6.119 ( talk) 00:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
can we please have some info about price? A ballpark figure will do, after all, Wikipedia is a great resource used by people worldwide because of its very detailed articles. 203.214.98.123 10:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
As of today it's being sold at Fnac stores in Portugal at 300 euro.-- 81.193.116.223 ( talk) 10:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Should the article make mention of the recent news of the upcomming US configuration of the N95?
The referencing for the US version was all second and third hand, and certainly nothing confirming or announcing anything. I've removed it for the time being, but as soon as it has been announced and there's reliable sources for it (ie, Nokia or a network), it should get added back in. I think it's worth adding that just because it's doing the rounds on the rumour mill doesn't mean it'll get released - not all phones that pop up as 'coming soon' actually make it to market. Wibbble 02:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
FCC documents for the certification of the US variant are available so that 'coming soon' claim is looking very strong. Although I agree it shouldn't be included in the article until an official announcement from Nokia. What I don't get is why references to the 8GB version are being repeatedly deleted when it definitely has been announced and Nokia has even published tech specs on it on their website. 84.202.176.97 17:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Official specs for the N95 NAM are now up on forum nokia, so it seems it is time to include it in the article. I suppose the best way is to expand the tech specs table to include the differences between the original, the 8GB and the NAM? UnAimedPlayer 11:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Since Nokia - AFAIK - still does not publish changelogs for software updates, or information on when they are released, or which product codes have updates available, it's not possible to have reliable references for this section. It's also going to tend towards userguide/how-to type content (which isn't appropriate for wikipedia, see: WP:NOT#INFO and WP:NOT#GUIDE). I've trimmed it a bit, and if no one can find references for what's left, I plan to remove it. Wibbble 11:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Given the dazzling argument here against the entire section, I agree with that slightly incoherent IP user and I'm going to remove the entire section as unreferenced. If anyone can find reliable, verifiable, references, and can justify the whole section under WP:NOT as mentioned above, speak up here before adding it back in. Wibbble 07:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
The firmware generation number given in the Acceleromator section would appear to be wrong, I was intersted in the automatic orientation which mine doesn't do and checked my firmware, which was v20.something, the article sugests that it is upto v30.0.015 but checking on Nokia's website the latest is v21.0.016, this maybe down to my location or the age of my phone as it is the earliest. Whichever it is the article indicates that there is only one firmware version.
Yakacm ( talk) 08:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
It should be fairly easy to find references for most of this article from Forum Nokia ( http://forum.nokia.com) and the Nokia website. Anyone up for hunting them down? Wibbble 07:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the section about the Music Edition of the N95 for a number of reasons:
Let's hold off and not jump the gun on this one - of the speculation I've read (and it is at this point ONLY speculation) the closest release date anywhere will be the end of Q4 2007 - at least 4 months away. I'm sure we'll hear something reliable from Nokia in the mean time. Cheers, ABVS1936 05:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Where did you get this information: "128MB RAM, up from 64MB." It's not listed on the side with technical specifications, and I can't find it in any announcement news. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bateyes ( talk • contribs) 06:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I suppose it won't be 6 months since it's just a revision, but nevertheless it should be mentioned if available. 12.28.109.82 23:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Unlike most mobile phones (Motorola, SonyEricsson, BlackBerry, and others) that feature a mini-USB connector, N95 do not charge its battery with the USB connector. It requires the user to carry a separate power supply. This is a drawback that should be advertised. Xor74 09:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Forget assumptions, advertising or arguing terms.. You are right the articles would get long if it included everything, however instead of arguing about mini-USB or micro-USB how about conceding that this is a truly valid nugget of information. IF you use this as a business phone then it is likely you will have information on it instead of a USB key, however as a business use phone it will also get drained quickly of power... thus it is equally valid information that IN USE the phone will need a USB cable and power pack. This information is just as valid as the type of GPS chipset or the size of the battery pack as it is an inherent ability of the phone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyclical ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Can I ask, why the image changes? The current images are called "official" images of either the n95 or the n95-8Gb, but where exactly did these images come from? And why change from the documented free images that were there in the first place? ABVS1936 ( talk) 10:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
How many have been sold so far and whats the market penetration? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.24.70.2 ( talk) 07:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Can someone please add links to the Predecessor and successor phones? I find those links very helpful when looking at phone articles.-- 88.18.131.205 ( talk) 17:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Insert non-formatted text here
I`ve come to realize that the Internet is full of sites, videos, and reviews claiming that the Chinese versions of the N95 are bad quality clones(not developed by Nokia). This wouldn't be much of an issue if it wasn't for the fact that I haven't found any sites stating otherwise besides this article. Maybe there's actually a official version that gets confused with the clone or the article is right and the so called "clone" is actually official but people around the Internet just didn't bothered to make some research before ranting about how their "fake" Chinese N95 doesn't have Wi-fi. So, is there any reliable source that these phones are really from Nokia? 190.176.227.7 ( talk) 23:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
The text of this article refers to "the N95 3G" when talking about the North American version. This appears to be causing confusion as, as far as I'm aware this is not the correct name of the phone and of course all the previous versions supported standard (WCDMA2100) 3G. I believe this should be changed to refer to the correct model number. Jckcip ( talk) 00:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I saw that too; I reworded the paragraph. -- Hlorri ( talk) 23:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
how do i acces internet on my n95 phone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.138.1.219 ( talk) 11:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I think the change/addition near "being connected for only a few minutes" by "17:35, 19 September 2010 by 110.36.63.254" should be reviewed. -- Mortense ( talk) 08:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
They should make new version of Nokia N95 silver the same shape with better camera quality 10 Megapixels , Internal Flash Memory 16 gb , Memory card slot micro 36 gb, long screen...
How big's the chip? 1/1.8" maybe? Great quality captures; does anyone have the info? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.10.37 ( talk) 23:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nokia N95. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)