 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This page is not ready for mainspace and was only created as a WP:ATD for pages that have now been deleted. I was considering a bold draftify, but I note that a bold redirect was already reverted. If a draftify will simply be reverted, we might skip that, so asking the page creator and other interested parties before draftifying. The alternative to draftify, of course, would be AfD - but then the question is not the state of the page, but the notability of the subject. Nike is notable, and they make a lot of football boots. I haven't searched on this specifically, but I think that some notable subject may well exist specifically on Nike boots, so if there were an AfD I expect I would be !voting draftify in any case. Fact is though, I don't know what the notable subject is, and this page does not tell me. So any objections to developing the article in draft space? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I just bold redirected this page and then noticed this was done before in September and reverted. I know that once a page is moved it may not be bold moved again, but not aware of such a rule for WP:BLAR. All the same, I probably would not have done this had I notice - but I won't self revert at this stage either, because that would then involve AfD and a bold redirect at least preserves page history and is easily undone should anyone actually want to write this article. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This page is not ready for mainspace and was only created as a WP:ATD for pages that have now been deleted. I was considering a bold draftify, but I note that a bold redirect was already reverted. If a draftify will simply be reverted, we might skip that, so asking the page creator and other interested parties before draftifying. The alternative to draftify, of course, would be AfD - but then the question is not the state of the page, but the notability of the subject. Nike is notable, and they make a lot of football boots. I haven't searched on this specifically, but I think that some notable subject may well exist specifically on Nike boots, so if there were an AfD I expect I would be !voting draftify in any case. Fact is though, I don't know what the notable subject is, and this page does not tell me. So any objections to developing the article in draft space? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I just bold redirected this page and then noticed this was done before in September and reverted. I know that once a page is moved it may not be bold moved again, but not aware of such a rule for WP:BLAR. All the same, I probably would not have done this had I notice - but I won't self revert at this stage either, because that would then involve AfD and a bold redirect at least preserves page history and is easily undone should anyone actually want to write this article. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)