![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
User:Securiger suggested the following fixes/improvements for the article:
The following cryptogram appeared in the Pall Mall Magazine, London, 1896, Secrets in Cipher part IV, and was described as insoluble. It is a Nihilist number cipher.
36 49 97 65 45 43 30 24 76 88 66 54 45 26 44 55 59 57 22 36 ? ?
The composer Edward Elgar was so proud of having solved it that he painted the numbers on a wooden box that still sits in the Elgar Birthplace Museum.
-- Steve ( talk) 02:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
But what is the solution? 86.187.224.128 ( talk) 20:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
"in practice they seem never to have been successfully cryptanalysed."
States the current article. This was achieved, admittedly many years later, by British intelligence. See "Spycatcher" by Peter Wright p375. AnnaComnemna ( talk) 12:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
User:Securiger suggested the following fixes/improvements for the article:
The following cryptogram appeared in the Pall Mall Magazine, London, 1896, Secrets in Cipher part IV, and was described as insoluble. It is a Nihilist number cipher.
36 49 97 65 45 43 30 24 76 88 66 54 45 26 44 55 59 57 22 36 ? ?
The composer Edward Elgar was so proud of having solved it that he painted the numbers on a wooden box that still sits in the Elgar Birthplace Museum.
-- Steve ( talk) 02:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
But what is the solution? 86.187.224.128 ( talk) 20:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
"in practice they seem never to have been successfully cryptanalysed."
States the current article. This was achieved, admittedly many years later, by British intelligence. See "Spycatcher" by Peter Wright p375. AnnaComnemna ( talk) 12:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)