This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Rapid transit / in UK / in London Mid‑importance Trains Portal DYK September 5, 2018 London Transport Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit. This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Mid-importance).

Opened with some facts about this new nighttime Tube service. Though given this is a TfL announcement, things are highly likely to change somewhat! So please edit as more up to date facts become available.  :-) Jimthing ( talk) 06:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

This article claims that if the Union's extra demands are met, there will be a £1.4bn extra cost, which would raise ALL fares by 6.5%, a strong subsidy of the nighttime service by the daytime one. http://www.cityam.com/222171/august-2015-tfl-tube-strike-tube-union-demands-cost-tfl-14bn-and-its-commuters-wholl-pay Vicarage ( talk) 15:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Your point for a WP article being what? Jimthing ( talk) 02:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Is the extension of services on a handful of lines for a few extra hours really worthy of its own article? I'm sure it can be summarised and built in nicely to the London Underground article. -- TBM10 ( talk) 15:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC) reply

With the tube strike dramas sparked by the Night Tube plan, I think it's worth a separate article. -- Sameboat - 同舟 ( talk · contri.) 02:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Separate article. It's got enough info to warrant it's own page, with a small intro on the main LU page with the link through to this more in depth one. Jimthing ( talk) 02:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Sure, better a separate article for an "action plan" not even implemented 18 months away its creation... is WP:FUTURE optional or it's just a way to give some workspace foo company announcements? :-)

At present a brief paragraph in main article could possibly be more than enough.-- Shivanarayana ( talk) 12:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply

When overlaying two 15 minutes headaways i get regulary a distance of 7.5 minutes between two trains....do they really delay the trains at Camden Town to get an 8 minute headaway?! -- 93.220.194.24 ( talk) 19:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC) reply