This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been vandalized numerous times and is semi-protected down again due to edit warring. Please review below corrections and undo the edit warring: 1) Claims not a neuroscientist https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1004373372&oldid=985995673
Is a "neuroscientist" https://ccnc.iu.edu/profiles/Alum/NicolePrause.html
2) Claims secret funding https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1004374108&oldid=1004373816
Funded by non-profit NORD https://journalstar.com/news/local/education/crowdfunded-grant-will-help-unl-researcher-study-sex-related-condition/article_131c1916-2b01-5d39-951c-af209d7f3baf.html https://www.ean-online.com/insights/interview/my-priorities-are-on-identifying-the-general-health-benefits-of-sexual-stimulation/
3) Claimed not high-profile and not replicated: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1005047293&oldid=1005047022 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1004554069&oldid=1004374108
Is "high-profile" https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/25/female-orgasm-research
Study is replicated/extended. Meaning of replication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103115001195 Replication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301051115300107 MERABDen ( talk) 23:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Nicole Prause, PhD publishes her funding sources in every peer-reviewed paper as any other scientist. The suggestion she has secret or "undisclosed" funds is unsubstantiated and should be removed. Jammoth ( talk) 19:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Jammoth ( talk) 19:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm not a major contributor to the article, and I'm not close to Prause (I only sent her a tweet once). tgeorgescu ( talk) 14:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Do I read her tweets? Yes, but I am my own man in respect to how I edit Wikipedia. tgeorgescu ( talk) 14:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Here it is:
Orgasmic meditation study
|
---|
Prause co-authored the first study citation needed on the effects of orgasmic meditation, short OM, a technic propagated by the controversal business OneTaste. It was published in 2021 and concluded that this genital stroking practice increased closeness in partners regardless of whether or not they had an existing romantic relationship. The study was founded by the Institute of OM Foundation an institution of OneTaste [1] References
|
Pseudosciencelightly, it is a WP:BLP violation. tgeorgescu ( talk) 16:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
pseudosciencelightly (i.e. WP:OR in a WP:BLP article) is sanctionable with a topic ban.
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/is-nicole-prause-influenced-by-the-porn-industry/ Jm33746 ( talk) 17:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been vandalized numerous times and is semi-protected down again due to edit warring. Please review below corrections and undo the edit warring: 1) Claims not a neuroscientist https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1004373372&oldid=985995673
Is a "neuroscientist" https://ccnc.iu.edu/profiles/Alum/NicolePrause.html
2) Claims secret funding https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1004374108&oldid=1004373816
Funded by non-profit NORD https://journalstar.com/news/local/education/crowdfunded-grant-will-help-unl-researcher-study-sex-related-condition/article_131c1916-2b01-5d39-951c-af209d7f3baf.html https://www.ean-online.com/insights/interview/my-priorities-are-on-identifying-the-general-health-benefits-of-sexual-stimulation/
3) Claimed not high-profile and not replicated: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1005047293&oldid=1005047022 https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Nicole_Prause&diff=1004554069&oldid=1004374108
Is "high-profile" https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/25/female-orgasm-research
Study is replicated/extended. Meaning of replication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103115001195 Replication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301051115300107 MERABDen ( talk) 23:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Nicole Prause, PhD publishes her funding sources in every peer-reviewed paper as any other scientist. The suggestion she has secret or "undisclosed" funds is unsubstantiated and should be removed. Jammoth ( talk) 19:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Jammoth ( talk) 19:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm not a major contributor to the article, and I'm not close to Prause (I only sent her a tweet once). tgeorgescu ( talk) 14:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Do I read her tweets? Yes, but I am my own man in respect to how I edit Wikipedia. tgeorgescu ( talk) 14:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Here it is:
Orgasmic meditation study
|
---|
Prause co-authored the first study citation needed on the effects of orgasmic meditation, short OM, a technic propagated by the controversal business OneTaste. It was published in 2021 and concluded that this genital stroking practice increased closeness in partners regardless of whether or not they had an existing romantic relationship. The study was founded by the Institute of OM Foundation an institution of OneTaste [1] References
|
Pseudosciencelightly, it is a WP:BLP violation. tgeorgescu ( talk) 16:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
pseudosciencelightly (i.e. WP:OR in a WP:BLP article) is sanctionable with a topic ban.
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/is-nicole-prause-influenced-by-the-porn-industry/ Jm33746 ( talk) 17:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)