![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article's main content was contributed by a user whose name indicates that he is the Communications Manager for the subject museum. This constituted a Conflict of Interest. Articles should be developed by neutral third party editors. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Is the mission statement the only infringing part of this article? If so, that does not justify deleting the whole article. If we really are going to discuss the mission statement, we would have to quote it, right? How about rewriting this as a sourced quote, or just deleting the mission statement section? -- Uncia ( talk) 22:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't agree with the stated reason: "This article reads like a brocure or ad for the museum." The article seems objective to me. I have removed the PROD tag. -- Uncia ( talk) 13:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article's main content was contributed by a user whose name indicates that he is the Communications Manager for the subject museum. This constituted a Conflict of Interest. Articles should be developed by neutral third party editors. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Is the mission statement the only infringing part of this article? If so, that does not justify deleting the whole article. If we really are going to discuss the mission statement, we would have to quote it, right? How about rewriting this as a sourced quote, or just deleting the mission statement section? -- Uncia ( talk) 22:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't agree with the stated reason: "This article reads like a brocure or ad for the museum." The article seems objective to me. I have removed the PROD tag. -- Uncia ( talk) 13:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)