This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
New 7 Wonders of Nature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 22 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from New7Wonders of Nature to New 7 Wonders of Nature. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Is this the correct title for this page? Should it be New7Wonders of Nature as corny as it is. When the title is determined it needs to be added to the DAB page for Wonders of the World (disambiguation). MDSNYDER 16:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, the committee calls it Natural 7 wonders, so I guess thats what we should to. Muhammad Mahdi Karim 17:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Category be tourism or Historic preservation (or public relations) ? The elections serve to raise money for, unrelated, restoration projects. This is private sector (in contrast to publicly financed-unesco) financing of restoration; events and merchandising just bring in the money. Corailrouge-eng 00:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The correct name is definetly New7Wonders of Nature [1]. The name of the article should be changed. 1000Fragen ( talk) 11:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
... about whether this is noteworthy enough for WP, and whether it will amount to a hill of beans! At present, five of the top seven are almost unknown, and the leading seven omits wonders which anyone with half a brain would think mandatory, such as the Amazon basin (river+forest). Macdonald-ross ( talk) 16:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
like the junk mail we all get: official notice from <insert sender name here>. It's a collective blog with 100,000,000 votes, but no criteria of who the electorate is, nor any control on the vote early and often crowd. Officious, yes. Official, hardly. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 20:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
New7Wonders of Nature → New Seven Wonders of Nature — Move on the basis of WP:MOSTM. Labattblueboy ( talk) 23:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
El yunque is NOT United States - Its PUERTO RICO. What a shame —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.165.54 ( talk) 17:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ha Long Bay.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC) |
Why does the criticisms header include the speech of the Philippine president which I think is not a criticism of the contest itself? - Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 11:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Pakistan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.58.173 ( talk) 16:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
The section "Stages of the campaign" seems to have been copied on July 27 2012 (diff) from a blog article dated July 7, 2012 which in turn seems to be a copy with minor changes, of the official world.new7wonders.com website. I am therefore reverting that section to the pre July 2012 version. Rincewind42 ( talk) 15:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New7Wonders of Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New7Wonders of Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
For some reason there are three related WP articles that all use the naming convention of "New7Wonders..." However, nowhere in the source materials (i.e., the official website) do they run the first three words of the name together like that; it is always written as "New 7 Wonders..." My suspicion is that all three articles were begun by the same editor who introduced that irregularity. They should be corrected. Bricology ( talk) 21:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections to adding spaces around the 7. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 06:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
– The two pages should be swapped, because the spacing the current page uses is incorrect, and it's inconsistent with the article text. The organization used to stick to the variant without spacing, but now official website uses correct spacing. Cslk ( talk) 10:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
New 7 Wonders of Nature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 22 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from New7Wonders of Nature to New 7 Wonders of Nature. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Is this the correct title for this page? Should it be New7Wonders of Nature as corny as it is. When the title is determined it needs to be added to the DAB page for Wonders of the World (disambiguation). MDSNYDER 16:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, the committee calls it Natural 7 wonders, so I guess thats what we should to. Muhammad Mahdi Karim 17:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Category be tourism or Historic preservation (or public relations) ? The elections serve to raise money for, unrelated, restoration projects. This is private sector (in contrast to publicly financed-unesco) financing of restoration; events and merchandising just bring in the money. Corailrouge-eng 00:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The correct name is definetly New7Wonders of Nature [1]. The name of the article should be changed. 1000Fragen ( talk) 11:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
... about whether this is noteworthy enough for WP, and whether it will amount to a hill of beans! At present, five of the top seven are almost unknown, and the leading seven omits wonders which anyone with half a brain would think mandatory, such as the Amazon basin (river+forest). Macdonald-ross ( talk) 16:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
like the junk mail we all get: official notice from <insert sender name here>. It's a collective blog with 100,000,000 votes, but no criteria of who the electorate is, nor any control on the vote early and often crowd. Officious, yes. Official, hardly. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 20:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
New7Wonders of Nature → New Seven Wonders of Nature — Move on the basis of WP:MOSTM. Labattblueboy ( talk) 23:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
El yunque is NOT United States - Its PUERTO RICO. What a shame —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.165.54 ( talk) 17:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ha Long Bay.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC) |
Why does the criticisms header include the speech of the Philippine president which I think is not a criticism of the contest itself? - Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 11:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Pakistan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.58.173 ( talk) 16:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
The section "Stages of the campaign" seems to have been copied on July 27 2012 (diff) from a blog article dated July 7, 2012 which in turn seems to be a copy with minor changes, of the official world.new7wonders.com website. I am therefore reverting that section to the pre July 2012 version. Rincewind42 ( talk) 15:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New7Wonders of Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New7Wonders of Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
For some reason there are three related WP articles that all use the naming convention of "New7Wonders..." However, nowhere in the source materials (i.e., the official website) do they run the first three words of the name together like that; it is always written as "New 7 Wonders..." My suspicion is that all three articles were begun by the same editor who introduced that irregularity. They should be corrected. Bricology ( talk) 21:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections to adding spaces around the 7. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 06:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
– The two pages should be swapped, because the spacing the current page uses is incorrect, and it's inconsistent with the article text. The organization used to stick to the variant without spacing, but now official website uses correct spacing. Cslk ( talk) 10:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)