![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi VoiceOfAll. A more accurate label would be pro-censorship or anti-censorship. Alternatively, pro-NPOV or anti-NPOV, anti-whitewash or pro-Whitewash, anti-spam pro-spam. It is not a matter of certain NLPers being unbelievably thick and cretinous any more. Nobody would be so stupid after so many repeat explanations at their own insistance. They are simply being deliberately deviant, conflict forming, and antagonistic to NPOV policy. HeadleyDown 04:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Converting is the keyword isn't it Comaze! You want to convert it to NLPdrooling ferocious resolve fanaticism. This is going to be interesting, especially when regardless of anybody else's edits, the article will be reverted to fact no matter what. So much for the deluded champions of commercial bullshit. HeadleyDown 13:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi VoiceOfAll. A more accurate label would be pro-censorship or anti-censorship. Alternatively, pro-NPOV or anti-NPOV, anti-whitewash or pro-Whitewash, anti-spam pro-spam. It is not a matter of certain NLPers being unbelievably thick and cretinous any more. Nobody would be so stupid after so many repeat explanations at their own insistance. They are simply being deliberately deviant, conflict forming, and antagonistic to NPOV policy. HeadleyDown 04:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Converting is the keyword isn't it Comaze! You want to convert it to NLPdrooling ferocious resolve fanaticism. This is going to be interesting, especially when regardless of anybody else's edits, the article will be reverted to fact no matter what. So much for the deluded champions of commercial bullshit. HeadleyDown 13:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)