This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Merge – Though the other article sucks, there might be some things in it that could be salvaged. -- Henriok 22:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok I think this article is way to general and needs to rewritten, so I think we should discuss a plan for rewriting it.
Here is the thing I think we should include
Network Processors are generally divided into the following type
Multimedia
Products for citation suggestion would be
I haven't look at cellphne processor & embedded processor for a really long time, so I made need some help. For network cellphone processors like Motorola, Nokia, LG and all the other comapies I never really look at their technical documentation before (because I wasn't interested). Also a lot of them weren't network processor, they are just features added on a regular microprocessor. Well my viewpiont of a microprocessor is that it has some parts of CPU function and miscnaellous other chips for flexibility (such as I/O, Host Controller Interface, accelerator, video decoder,...etc.)
So the reference is have to be very clearly. -- Ramu50 ( talk) 17:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Merge – Though the other article sucks, there might be some things in it that could be salvaged. -- Henriok 22:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok I think this article is way to general and needs to rewritten, so I think we should discuss a plan for rewriting it.
Here is the thing I think we should include
Network Processors are generally divided into the following type
Multimedia
Products for citation suggestion would be
I haven't look at cellphne processor & embedded processor for a really long time, so I made need some help. For network cellphone processors like Motorola, Nokia, LG and all the other comapies I never really look at their technical documentation before (because I wasn't interested). Also a lot of them weren't network processor, they are just features added on a regular microprocessor. Well my viewpiont of a microprocessor is that it has some parts of CPU function and miscnaellous other chips for flexibility (such as I/O, Host Controller Interface, accelerator, video decoder,...etc.)
So the reference is have to be very clearly. -- Ramu50 ( talk) 17:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)