![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Sounds like a good idea to me, it's just the European division of the company and seems to be pretty identical. Merge. Iancaddy 23:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree as well. IT should be merged as both companies operate the same programme and allow custonmers to interchange aircraft in both continents.
Whilst offerings are similar NetJets Europe is not a subsidiary - it exists as a company in its own right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.99.135.146 ( talk) 14:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Should be supported by facts, which are not found later in the article. If NetJets is a smaller competitor (in fleet size, operations, flight hours, service level) in its market, please clarify or reference to that extent. Septimus 06:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Nothing in the article on their safety record? ask123 ( talk) 13:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NetJets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! User:NetJets rep JB here with a request for editors' consideration. You can see on my user page that I'm here to represent NetJets to help improve the current Wikipedia article, but I understand that Wiki rules are in place for a "COI editor" like me. I respect these guidelines and I won't ever edit the article myself. Instead, I'll post my recommendations here for other editors to weigh-in and help in my place when inclined to, as I'm doing here.
My first request is for editors to update details in the article about Elton De'Souza (also seen spelled "D'Sousa"). The infobox lists him as "CEO of NetJets Europe" which is incorrect as he was President, and also now outdated since he resigned and Christian Luwisch has taken his place. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the infobox could list NetJets Europe as a subsidiary of NetJets, but since the article is about NetJets, not NetJets Europe specifically, its president does not need to be included in the infobox's list of Key People. For these reasons, I'm asking if editors agree and are willing to make the following changes:
Since I'm asking for these details to be removed, I wonder if it's enough for editors to verify this change via LinkedIn and corporate profiles online? If not, I'm happy to look for a source to help volunteers, but it should be noted that there is not much coverage of NetJets Europe, especially about changing internal corporate roles.
Thanks editors, in advance, for any help! Many thanks, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 21:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Ahunt, Thanks so much for your assistance with these edits regarding Elton De Souza's removal from the page! I'll reply to your note about Key people along with some other thoughts about the infobox in a separate post below. Thanks again, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 14:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, NetJets rep JB here with some new suggestions for updating the current article's infobox, as follows:
and incorporate the following updates:
I'm pinging Ahunt both in reply to your inquiry above, and in case you have any thoughts about my suggestions here and are willing to assist further.
I'll continue to post my recommendations here and ask for community volunteers to help adjust the article itself, as I respect Wikipedia's rules about my conflict of interest. Thanks for any consideration or advice. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 14:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
References
Hello editors, I'm back with more observations of update opportunities, specifically within the Fleet section of the article. Once again, I won't implement any direct changes myself because of my paid conflict of interest. Specifically, I recommend the following changes:
(According to the source used in the current article [1])
16
References
If editors agree that the following break-down of the U.S. and Europe Fleet by aircraft type is helpful for readers, I'm including it here as well to be considered for addition within the Fleet section as editors see fit. (Note that the source I'm providing for verification is a primary one, although it is an updated (2021) fact sheet like one (2018) seen referenced in the current article.)
U.S. and Europe Fleet:
If helpful, I am also providing a few recent, industry sources that may help editors to verify recent changes to the fleet in response to COVID-19 pandemic-related demand: * Reuters, Nov 2020 * AINOnline, April 2020 * RUSTourismNews, Oct 2020
Are there any volunteers willing to check my work and apply these updates within the article on my behalf? Thanks for your consideration! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 19:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); line feed character in |url=
at position 61 (
help)
Hi there, once again. I'm back with some thoughts for improving the article's current content within Subsidiaries. After user:Ahunt's recent help to make the section current, alongside updates to the Infobox ( discussed above), I noticed that the section is largey unsourced apart from those recent changes. It also appears overly formatted, in my opinion, for the amount of content it contains. I wonder if editors have any thoughts about improving sourcing as I propose below, and also moving its contents to the History section so as to do away with the separate "Subsidiaries" heading and subheadings. Alternatively, perhaps it makes more sense to create a new "Operations" section, paired with details recently moved from Fleet to History. I'm interested in thoughts from editors, and ask that a volunteer integrate some version of these changes on my behalf, as deemed fit. As always, I will not adjust the live article myself because of my COI.
Lastly, I'm pinging editor Ahunt once more to say thanks (again!) for assistance with recent changes to Fleet and I welcome your insight if this new request interests you as well.
Thanks in advance for any other thoughts or assistance! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 21:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
References
Hello editors, I am returning again with more thoughts on further improvements to the History section. Thanks to user:Ahunt's recent help to reorganize and update the article's content, this section is more cohesive and robust than before. My new observations and suggestions are as follows: *I wonder if it would help readers to break up the text by adding an Operations subheading. I suggest doing so at the start of
the paragraph beginning "In early August 2009, Santulli resigned as CEO…" *I noticed a few more details may be relevant from the AINOnline source referenced within the current article. Specifically, I suggest replacing the first sentence in History with content similar to the following: "NetJets was founded in 1964 originally known as Executive Jet Airways. The name was later changed to Executive Jet Aviation (EJA), and again in 2002 to NetJets after Berkshire Hathaway's 1998 purchase of the company. NetJets was the first private business jet charter and aircraft management company in the world, launching its fractional ownership business in 1986."
Hello again, editors! I have returned to thank you, Ahunt, yet again for your continued assistance with improving the article, most recently within History. Also with my return, I have collected a few more thoughts to suggest further improvements now to the current Business model section for editors to review. Mainly, I noticed the section lacks proper sourcing. I propose the following changes with suggested sourcing for verification, as follows:
As always, I welcome feedback from others and I'm happy to collaborate further. As well, I'll request that a volunteer such as User:Ahunt or another will make changes on my behalf so I may remain respectful of policies for COI editors like me. Thank you! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 18:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello editors, I have a new request after more recent improvements to the article - thanks again to Ahunt's help and collaboration. In looking at the current See also section's content, I noticed that there is a short list of NetJets' competitors listed that seems arbitrarily selected. I wonder if there is a way to improve this list with more relevant pages, or if editors think it should be removed altogether? If others agree that it should be expanded with other relevant entries, I'm happy to collaborate further to help identify those. I welcome feedback from the community and ask that a reviewing volunteer make changes on my behalf. I will continue to avoid doing so directly, myself, due to my conflict of interest as a paid employee of the brand. Thanks, as always, for any consideration or thoughts shared. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 16:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello editors, once again, I've returned to address a new set of observations. Specifically, I noticed that the Accidents and incidents section is atypical for similar content within other industry adjacent articles on Wikipedia. Generally, the table included in the section appears incomplete and lacking of appropriate citations for much of the existing content. I wonder if it makes sense to simplify the table so it is a bulleted list instead, and reduce its contents to list the noteworthy incidents that have Wikipedia-appropriate references and are most relevant to readers - perhaps those that were nationally reported. Ahunt, as you have been hugely collaborative on recent improvements to the article, I wonder if you have any thoughts or suggestions for the best approach to improving this section? I welcome feedback from reviewing editors and will defer to the community's consensus. As always, I will ask that a volunteer make edits to the live article on my behalf, so I may remain respectful of rules for my conflict of interest as a NetJets employee. Thanks in advance for any consideration or thoughts shared. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 15:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, editors. Thanks once again for Ahunt's help, the Accidents and incidents table and section appears much more concise and accurate. I have returned with a few more observations, this time about the Concerns and conflicts section. Specifically:
short-stature-enough-for-sex-bias-suit-for-now/ Bloomberg Law] published an update on the case, but editors should note that it is behind a paywall and may be difficult to access for some.
As always, thanks for any consideration and collaboration. Again, I'm interested in any thoughts User:Ahunt might have on the best handling of these points, given prior significant contributions to the page, though I welcome feedback from any editors. As always, I ask that a volunteer implement changes on my behalf due to my COI, and I will defer to community consensus on best practices. Cheers, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 17:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Not misuse description list markup (";") to create pseudo-headings.This is for accessibility requirements, like making the table of contents work right.
Hello editors, thanks to collaboration with Ahunt, the NetJets article appears much improved in terms of relevant and quality information and its organization. Now that the body of the article has been updated and brought current, I wonder if it makes sense to update the introduction to reflect these improvements and provide a better summary of the article's contents. I have included my proposed draft for updating the lead below, hoping to make it easy for editors to review and implement as they see fit:
References
NetJets poineered the fractional ownership concept for private jets.
NEW YORK (Reuters) - NetJets Inc, the corporate aircraft unit of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRKa.N) (BRKb.N), said on Thursday it bought Marquis Jet, which has a program that sells flight time on NetJets planes. Terms of the sale were not disclosed.
As always I ask that a reviewing volunteer make these changes on my behalf so I may continue to respect rules and guidelines about my paid conflict of interest as an employee. I welcome editors' feedback and will defer to the consensus of the reviewing community. Thank you, again, in advance for any assistance! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 20:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I'm back again with a quick request and question. Ahunt, thanks for making the updates to the introduction, and for all the support you've provided. If you're still available, I'd welcome your feedback and assistance with the requests below.
As always, I appreciate feedback and help implementing appropriate requests so I can continue to follow all rules for conflict of interest editors. I understand if editors choose to alter my proposed content. Thanks, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 17:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, Jude from NetJets here. I've been revisiting some sections of this article and have a couple of questions/thoughts regarding the Fleet section and the Competitors list.
Ahunt, Thank you again for all of your wonderful help. Since you've worked on both those sections, I wonder if you'd be able to weigh in here?
airlines that offer fractional ownership in Competitors? (XOJET, FlexJex, etc.)?
Thanks so much for your consideration. I'm grateful for the help I've received here. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 21:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Ahunt: I appreciate the clarification there, that's what I thought. If you're interested, I've posted a new request below. Thanks! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 18:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like to make a small request for an update to the Marquis Jet card.
Thanks for all the help reviewing my COI requests! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 18:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt! I had a thought about the newly streamlined Fleet section. Now that it's been trimmed down, can we add an image showing an example of the type of jets in the fleet? I think the Cessna Citation Latitude would make sense, because it's our flagship and there are photos of it on Wikimedia Commons. This article from the Wichita Business Journal notes when we got our 100th Citation Latitude, in case that might be useful for a caption.
Happy to hear feedback and thoughts on this addition. Thanks for everything! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 14:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Jenna from NetJets here. I have a question about the Boeing 737 image in the History section. I saw that Jude previously asked about removing the image, and it was left in place with an updated caption. Since the article body doesn't mention 737s, I was wondering if it would make sense to replace it with an image such as this one, since the Citation Latitude is mentioned in 2010s? A simple caption like "A NetJets Cessna Citation Latitude" would be fine.
Ahunt, if you're around, I'd be interested in your thoughts. Thank you, NetJetsJM ( talk) 14:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Sounds like a good idea to me, it's just the European division of the company and seems to be pretty identical. Merge. Iancaddy 23:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree as well. IT should be merged as both companies operate the same programme and allow custonmers to interchange aircraft in both continents.
Whilst offerings are similar NetJets Europe is not a subsidiary - it exists as a company in its own right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.99.135.146 ( talk) 14:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Should be supported by facts, which are not found later in the article. If NetJets is a smaller competitor (in fleet size, operations, flight hours, service level) in its market, please clarify or reference to that extent. Septimus 06:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Nothing in the article on their safety record? ask123 ( talk) 13:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NetJets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! User:NetJets rep JB here with a request for editors' consideration. You can see on my user page that I'm here to represent NetJets to help improve the current Wikipedia article, but I understand that Wiki rules are in place for a "COI editor" like me. I respect these guidelines and I won't ever edit the article myself. Instead, I'll post my recommendations here for other editors to weigh-in and help in my place when inclined to, as I'm doing here.
My first request is for editors to update details in the article about Elton De'Souza (also seen spelled "D'Sousa"). The infobox lists him as "CEO of NetJets Europe" which is incorrect as he was President, and also now outdated since he resigned and Christian Luwisch has taken his place. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the infobox could list NetJets Europe as a subsidiary of NetJets, but since the article is about NetJets, not NetJets Europe specifically, its president does not need to be included in the infobox's list of Key People. For these reasons, I'm asking if editors agree and are willing to make the following changes:
Since I'm asking for these details to be removed, I wonder if it's enough for editors to verify this change via LinkedIn and corporate profiles online? If not, I'm happy to look for a source to help volunteers, but it should be noted that there is not much coverage of NetJets Europe, especially about changing internal corporate roles.
Thanks editors, in advance, for any help! Many thanks, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 21:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Ahunt, Thanks so much for your assistance with these edits regarding Elton De Souza's removal from the page! I'll reply to your note about Key people along with some other thoughts about the infobox in a separate post below. Thanks again, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 14:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, NetJets rep JB here with some new suggestions for updating the current article's infobox, as follows:
and incorporate the following updates:
I'm pinging Ahunt both in reply to your inquiry above, and in case you have any thoughts about my suggestions here and are willing to assist further.
I'll continue to post my recommendations here and ask for community volunteers to help adjust the article itself, as I respect Wikipedia's rules about my conflict of interest. Thanks for any consideration or advice. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 14:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
References
Hello editors, I'm back with more observations of update opportunities, specifically within the Fleet section of the article. Once again, I won't implement any direct changes myself because of my paid conflict of interest. Specifically, I recommend the following changes:
(According to the source used in the current article [1])
16
References
If editors agree that the following break-down of the U.S. and Europe Fleet by aircraft type is helpful for readers, I'm including it here as well to be considered for addition within the Fleet section as editors see fit. (Note that the source I'm providing for verification is a primary one, although it is an updated (2021) fact sheet like one (2018) seen referenced in the current article.)
U.S. and Europe Fleet:
If helpful, I am also providing a few recent, industry sources that may help editors to verify recent changes to the fleet in response to COVID-19 pandemic-related demand: * Reuters, Nov 2020 * AINOnline, April 2020 * RUSTourismNews, Oct 2020
Are there any volunteers willing to check my work and apply these updates within the article on my behalf? Thanks for your consideration! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 19:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); line feed character in |url=
at position 61 (
help)
Hi there, once again. I'm back with some thoughts for improving the article's current content within Subsidiaries. After user:Ahunt's recent help to make the section current, alongside updates to the Infobox ( discussed above), I noticed that the section is largey unsourced apart from those recent changes. It also appears overly formatted, in my opinion, for the amount of content it contains. I wonder if editors have any thoughts about improving sourcing as I propose below, and also moving its contents to the History section so as to do away with the separate "Subsidiaries" heading and subheadings. Alternatively, perhaps it makes more sense to create a new "Operations" section, paired with details recently moved from Fleet to History. I'm interested in thoughts from editors, and ask that a volunteer integrate some version of these changes on my behalf, as deemed fit. As always, I will not adjust the live article myself because of my COI.
Lastly, I'm pinging editor Ahunt once more to say thanks (again!) for assistance with recent changes to Fleet and I welcome your insight if this new request interests you as well.
Thanks in advance for any other thoughts or assistance! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 21:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
References
Hello editors, I am returning again with more thoughts on further improvements to the History section. Thanks to user:Ahunt's recent help to reorganize and update the article's content, this section is more cohesive and robust than before. My new observations and suggestions are as follows: *I wonder if it would help readers to break up the text by adding an Operations subheading. I suggest doing so at the start of
the paragraph beginning "In early August 2009, Santulli resigned as CEO…" *I noticed a few more details may be relevant from the AINOnline source referenced within the current article. Specifically, I suggest replacing the first sentence in History with content similar to the following: "NetJets was founded in 1964 originally known as Executive Jet Airways. The name was later changed to Executive Jet Aviation (EJA), and again in 2002 to NetJets after Berkshire Hathaway's 1998 purchase of the company. NetJets was the first private business jet charter and aircraft management company in the world, launching its fractional ownership business in 1986."
Hello again, editors! I have returned to thank you, Ahunt, yet again for your continued assistance with improving the article, most recently within History. Also with my return, I have collected a few more thoughts to suggest further improvements now to the current Business model section for editors to review. Mainly, I noticed the section lacks proper sourcing. I propose the following changes with suggested sourcing for verification, as follows:
As always, I welcome feedback from others and I'm happy to collaborate further. As well, I'll request that a volunteer such as User:Ahunt or another will make changes on my behalf so I may remain respectful of policies for COI editors like me. Thank you! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 18:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello editors, I have a new request after more recent improvements to the article - thanks again to Ahunt's help and collaboration. In looking at the current See also section's content, I noticed that there is a short list of NetJets' competitors listed that seems arbitrarily selected. I wonder if there is a way to improve this list with more relevant pages, or if editors think it should be removed altogether? If others agree that it should be expanded with other relevant entries, I'm happy to collaborate further to help identify those. I welcome feedback from the community and ask that a reviewing volunteer make changes on my behalf. I will continue to avoid doing so directly, myself, due to my conflict of interest as a paid employee of the brand. Thanks, as always, for any consideration or thoughts shared. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 16:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello editors, once again, I've returned to address a new set of observations. Specifically, I noticed that the Accidents and incidents section is atypical for similar content within other industry adjacent articles on Wikipedia. Generally, the table included in the section appears incomplete and lacking of appropriate citations for much of the existing content. I wonder if it makes sense to simplify the table so it is a bulleted list instead, and reduce its contents to list the noteworthy incidents that have Wikipedia-appropriate references and are most relevant to readers - perhaps those that were nationally reported. Ahunt, as you have been hugely collaborative on recent improvements to the article, I wonder if you have any thoughts or suggestions for the best approach to improving this section? I welcome feedback from reviewing editors and will defer to the community's consensus. As always, I will ask that a volunteer make edits to the live article on my behalf, so I may remain respectful of rules for my conflict of interest as a NetJets employee. Thanks in advance for any consideration or thoughts shared. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 15:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, editors. Thanks once again for Ahunt's help, the Accidents and incidents table and section appears much more concise and accurate. I have returned with a few more observations, this time about the Concerns and conflicts section. Specifically:
short-stature-enough-for-sex-bias-suit-for-now/ Bloomberg Law] published an update on the case, but editors should note that it is behind a paywall and may be difficult to access for some.
As always, thanks for any consideration and collaboration. Again, I'm interested in any thoughts User:Ahunt might have on the best handling of these points, given prior significant contributions to the page, though I welcome feedback from any editors. As always, I ask that a volunteer implement changes on my behalf due to my COI, and I will defer to community consensus on best practices. Cheers, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 17:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Not misuse description list markup (";") to create pseudo-headings.This is for accessibility requirements, like making the table of contents work right.
Hello editors, thanks to collaboration with Ahunt, the NetJets article appears much improved in terms of relevant and quality information and its organization. Now that the body of the article has been updated and brought current, I wonder if it makes sense to update the introduction to reflect these improvements and provide a better summary of the article's contents. I have included my proposed draft for updating the lead below, hoping to make it easy for editors to review and implement as they see fit:
References
NetJets poineered the fractional ownership concept for private jets.
NEW YORK (Reuters) - NetJets Inc, the corporate aircraft unit of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRKa.N) (BRKb.N), said on Thursday it bought Marquis Jet, which has a program that sells flight time on NetJets planes. Terms of the sale were not disclosed.
As always I ask that a reviewing volunteer make these changes on my behalf so I may continue to respect rules and guidelines about my paid conflict of interest as an employee. I welcome editors' feedback and will defer to the consensus of the reviewing community. Thank you, again, in advance for any assistance! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 20:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I'm back again with a quick request and question. Ahunt, thanks for making the updates to the introduction, and for all the support you've provided. If you're still available, I'd welcome your feedback and assistance with the requests below.
As always, I appreciate feedback and help implementing appropriate requests so I can continue to follow all rules for conflict of interest editors. I understand if editors choose to alter my proposed content. Thanks, NetJets rep JB ( talk) 17:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, Jude from NetJets here. I've been revisiting some sections of this article and have a couple of questions/thoughts regarding the Fleet section and the Competitors list.
Ahunt, Thank you again for all of your wonderful help. Since you've worked on both those sections, I wonder if you'd be able to weigh in here?
airlines that offer fractional ownership in Competitors? (XOJET, FlexJex, etc.)?
Thanks so much for your consideration. I'm grateful for the help I've received here. NetJets rep JB ( talk) 21:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Ahunt: I appreciate the clarification there, that's what I thought. If you're interested, I've posted a new request below. Thanks! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 18:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like to make a small request for an update to the Marquis Jet card.
Thanks for all the help reviewing my COI requests! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 18:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt! I had a thought about the newly streamlined Fleet section. Now that it's been trimmed down, can we add an image showing an example of the type of jets in the fleet? I think the Cessna Citation Latitude would make sense, because it's our flagship and there are photos of it on Wikimedia Commons. This article from the Wichita Business Journal notes when we got our 100th Citation Latitude, in case that might be useful for a caption.
Happy to hear feedback and thoughts on this addition. Thanks for everything! NetJets rep JB ( talk) 14:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Jenna from NetJets here. I have a question about the Boeing 737 image in the History section. I saw that Jude previously asked about removing the image, and it was left in place with an updated caption. Since the article body doesn't mention 737s, I was wondering if it would make sense to replace it with an image such as this one, since the Citation Latitude is mentioned in 2010s? A simple caption like "A NetJets Cessna Citation Latitude" would be fine.
Ahunt, if you're around, I'd be interested in your thoughts. Thank you, NetJetsJM ( talk) 14:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)