This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
NetBeans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This page has been vandalized. I have no time right now, but can somebody get on that?
thanks
For a major IDE, this could probably be fleshed out a little more. Enochlau 14:16, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Also, it would be nice if the Swing versus SWT issue was mentioned.
Lukas Hasik's Weblog: NetBeans History -- mj41 10:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I think the NetBeans 9.0 is already released (no RC). Currently in the article it is 8.2 and preview is set to 9.0 RC3. https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb90/nb90.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.46.114.159 ( talk) 10:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The Stable Release info is out of date Apache NetBeans 14 Latest version of the IDE, released on June 9, 2022 https://netbeans.apache.org/download/index.html https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb14/nb14.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.182.198 ( talk) 14:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
soon to come, Visual Web Pack -- bring Sun Java Studo Creator's funcationalities to NetBeans
What language is NetBeans written in? -- Spectracide 01:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's irrelevant that NetBeans was developed using NetBeans. This should be at best a piece of trivia, and definitely not part of the article's first sentence.
- It is however relevant that NetBeans is written in Java, and this is not mentioned prominently, but only in the NetBeans IDE section.
- NetBeans Platform, as distinct from the NetBeans IDE, should be described wholly in the eponymous subsection. I think developers will agree NetBeans is known primarily for being an IDE. Hence the NetBeans IDE section should also probably come first.
- "Since modules can be developed independently, applications based on the NetBeans platform can be easily and powerfully[citation needed] extended by third party developers." -- "independently" can be combined into the previous sentence; second clause is pure opinion.
- The information about NetBeans 5.5 reads like a sales pitch. ("comprehensive support ... rich client applications"; unqualified "editor enhancements") -- if history of versions is important, then make this a factual separate section.
- "each module provides a well-defined function" -- well-defined is a matter of opinion in this case (not talking about a fixed API, etc.). "Targets a specific function" would probably be more accurate.
- IDE Packs section -- again a sales brochure. "the NetBeans Profiler is able to obtain runtime information on applications that are too large or complex for other profilers" -- really? I think it would be more concise and less presumptuous to detail what the profiler does, and point the reader to more comprehensive documentation about that type of profiling. These statements as written are unqualified claims, and likely to be out of date in the future.
-Please put the tech requirments into the text
MM962 05:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Why is this JavaScript Editor listed with other official Netbeans packs? Isn't this section only for 1st party extensions? -- ren 04:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
There is no mention to the former IDE 'Forte". -- Notopia ( talk) 15:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
i want tutorial for net beans full utilization of that program tool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.163.199 ( talk) 13:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
http://wiki.netbeans.org/OSGiAndNetBeans there is some spec page but i think its worth to mention because of a possbile interaction with eclipse rcp plugins or other OSGi plugins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.25.101.85 ( talk) 22:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't NetBeans have a complete new logo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.87.175.242 ( talk) 13:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
There's one image with the text "Netbeans 6.5 Beta 1 debugging a C++ application with NetBeans C/C++ Pack & The Cygwin Compiler, In Microsoft Windows XP.".
But the image doesn't show the debugger; it shows 3 compilation errors.
190.135.197.117 ( talk) 01:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
According to this page, having only the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) is not sufficient to run the application. -- 200.99.204.146 ( talk) 17:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
List of NetBeans-based software has exactly one entry, which IMHO doesn't merit a separate article. It should be merged into this one, maybe in a new section.-- Oneiros ( talk) 12:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NetBeans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
It appears the material under Netbeans IDE -- License is out of date. The History section seems to read that the proposed transfer to Apache has already happened. I'm not sure if that would have affected the licensing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:41FA:8400:2099:622E:15FF:173B ( talk) 01:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
When you start the IDE it everywhere says "Apache Netbeans" (I hate that by the way, but I have no say in this). Is this article still current? -- Alien4 ( talk) 20:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Please fix latest preview version, it is not 12, it is 14. But the format of how to fix it - is not obvious for me... it is something about wikidata|property. I'm lost. Please help me understand this format -- Мель Ау ( talk) 22:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
NetBeans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This page has been vandalized. I have no time right now, but can somebody get on that?
thanks
For a major IDE, this could probably be fleshed out a little more. Enochlau 14:16, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Also, it would be nice if the Swing versus SWT issue was mentioned.
Lukas Hasik's Weblog: NetBeans History -- mj41 10:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I think the NetBeans 9.0 is already released (no RC). Currently in the article it is 8.2 and preview is set to 9.0 RC3. https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb90/nb90.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.46.114.159 ( talk) 10:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The Stable Release info is out of date Apache NetBeans 14 Latest version of the IDE, released on June 9, 2022 https://netbeans.apache.org/download/index.html https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb14/nb14.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.182.198 ( talk) 14:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
soon to come, Visual Web Pack -- bring Sun Java Studo Creator's funcationalities to NetBeans
What language is NetBeans written in? -- Spectracide 01:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's irrelevant that NetBeans was developed using NetBeans. This should be at best a piece of trivia, and definitely not part of the article's first sentence.
- It is however relevant that NetBeans is written in Java, and this is not mentioned prominently, but only in the NetBeans IDE section.
- NetBeans Platform, as distinct from the NetBeans IDE, should be described wholly in the eponymous subsection. I think developers will agree NetBeans is known primarily for being an IDE. Hence the NetBeans IDE section should also probably come first.
- "Since modules can be developed independently, applications based on the NetBeans platform can be easily and powerfully[citation needed] extended by third party developers." -- "independently" can be combined into the previous sentence; second clause is pure opinion.
- The information about NetBeans 5.5 reads like a sales pitch. ("comprehensive support ... rich client applications"; unqualified "editor enhancements") -- if history of versions is important, then make this a factual separate section.
- "each module provides a well-defined function" -- well-defined is a matter of opinion in this case (not talking about a fixed API, etc.). "Targets a specific function" would probably be more accurate.
- IDE Packs section -- again a sales brochure. "the NetBeans Profiler is able to obtain runtime information on applications that are too large or complex for other profilers" -- really? I think it would be more concise and less presumptuous to detail what the profiler does, and point the reader to more comprehensive documentation about that type of profiling. These statements as written are unqualified claims, and likely to be out of date in the future.
-Please put the tech requirments into the text
MM962 05:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Why is this JavaScript Editor listed with other official Netbeans packs? Isn't this section only for 1st party extensions? -- ren 04:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
There is no mention to the former IDE 'Forte". -- Notopia ( talk) 15:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
i want tutorial for net beans full utilization of that program tool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.163.199 ( talk) 13:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
http://wiki.netbeans.org/OSGiAndNetBeans there is some spec page but i think its worth to mention because of a possbile interaction with eclipse rcp plugins or other OSGi plugins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.25.101.85 ( talk) 22:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't NetBeans have a complete new logo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.87.175.242 ( talk) 13:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
There's one image with the text "Netbeans 6.5 Beta 1 debugging a C++ application with NetBeans C/C++ Pack & The Cygwin Compiler, In Microsoft Windows XP.".
But the image doesn't show the debugger; it shows 3 compilation errors.
190.135.197.117 ( talk) 01:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
According to this page, having only the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) is not sufficient to run the application. -- 200.99.204.146 ( talk) 17:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
List of NetBeans-based software has exactly one entry, which IMHO doesn't merit a separate article. It should be merged into this one, maybe in a new section.-- Oneiros ( talk) 12:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NetBeans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
It appears the material under Netbeans IDE -- License is out of date. The History section seems to read that the proposed transfer to Apache has already happened. I'm not sure if that would have affected the licensing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:41FA:8400:2099:622E:15FF:173B ( talk) 01:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
When you start the IDE it everywhere says "Apache Netbeans" (I hate that by the way, but I have no say in this). Is this article still current? -- Alien4 ( talk) 20:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Please fix latest preview version, it is not 12, it is 14. But the format of how to fix it - is not obvious for me... it is something about wikidata|property. I'm lost. Please help me understand this format -- Мель Ау ( talk) 22:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)