![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Neoliberalism (international relations) page were merged into Liberal institutionalism on 30 December 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Neoliberalism is NOT a "realist" theory. They do share a state-central view of IR, however neoliberalism does not intrinsically state that the system is anarchic, which is the major defining charachteristic of Realism. It is also true that they both have Constructivist strains, that is not a defining characteristic of either. --
Scaife
(Talk)
Don't forget
Hanlon's Razor
20:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry to disturb here, but reading the article, I believe it is higly centered around criticism against neorealism when in fact there are important dimensions of neoliberalism that should have a special section like Institutional, Economic, Repubican (aka Democratic) and Sociological theories within neoliberalism. Just a humble suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.205.24.2 ( talk) 14:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This article initially had a section entitled "Criticisms," but then went on to list not critiques of neoliberal theory, but rather its contentions, i.e. the points it makes when criticizing others. I thought this was pretty confusing, so I renamed the section "Contentions". Incidentally, the article remains a major mess. Nicolasdz 17:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 19:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Just saw this on Stephen Saideman's blog ( http://saideman.blogspot.com/2019/10/proxy-madness.html) and have to agree:
"I am kind of disturbed that half of the wikipedia entry about Neo-Liberalism focuses on John Mearsheimer who is hostile to Neo-Liberalism. But that is something for another day."
FoolishSophist ( talk) 13:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I propose to merge Neoliberalism (international relations) into Institutional liberalism (which I've proposed to rename "Liberal institutionalism". These are broadly the same thing. It makes no sense having two separate articles about virtually the same scholarship. The term Institutional liberalism is more precise and is the term used by advocates for the theory. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Neoliberalism (international relations) page were merged into Liberal institutionalism on 30 December 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Neoliberalism is NOT a "realist" theory. They do share a state-central view of IR, however neoliberalism does not intrinsically state that the system is anarchic, which is the major defining charachteristic of Realism. It is also true that they both have Constructivist strains, that is not a defining characteristic of either. --
Scaife
(Talk)
Don't forget
Hanlon's Razor
20:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry to disturb here, but reading the article, I believe it is higly centered around criticism against neorealism when in fact there are important dimensions of neoliberalism that should have a special section like Institutional, Economic, Repubican (aka Democratic) and Sociological theories within neoliberalism. Just a humble suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.205.24.2 ( talk) 14:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This article initially had a section entitled "Criticisms," but then went on to list not critiques of neoliberal theory, but rather its contentions, i.e. the points it makes when criticizing others. I thought this was pretty confusing, so I renamed the section "Contentions". Incidentally, the article remains a major mess. Nicolasdz 17:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 19:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Just saw this on Stephen Saideman's blog ( http://saideman.blogspot.com/2019/10/proxy-madness.html) and have to agree:
"I am kind of disturbed that half of the wikipedia entry about Neo-Liberalism focuses on John Mearsheimer who is hostile to Neo-Liberalism. But that is something for another day."
FoolishSophist ( talk) 13:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I propose to merge Neoliberalism (international relations) into Institutional liberalism (which I've proposed to rename "Liberal institutionalism". These are broadly the same thing. It makes no sense having two separate articles about virtually the same scholarship. The term Institutional liberalism is more precise and is the term used by advocates for the theory. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)