The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVE by consensus with the assistance of multiple admins to perform CSD#G6 to make room for the moves. Tiggerjay ( talk) 23:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply

• Nebraska Initiative Measure 416 (2000) → Nebraska Initiative Measure 416
• Colorado Amendment 43 (2006) → Colorado Amendment 43
• Arizona Proposition 102 (2008) → Arizona Proposition 102

–

• Unnecessary disambiguation 82.132.139.249 ( talk) 23:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Are these amendments etc numbered 1 2 3 4 starting again at 1 in each year, or did the count start when the state was founded? Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 06:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC) reply
  • In the case of Nebraska, they are (evidently) numbered sequentially, from whenever they started. In the case of Colorado, the measure passed, becoming the 43rd Amendment to the constitution, and the year it passed is clearly not needed. In Arizona they are clearly not numbered sequentially, as Arizona Proposition 107 on the same subject was in 2006, and failed. This one, 102 in 2008, passed, adding Article 30 to the constitution, and the article might more appropriately be titled Arizona Constitution Article 30. Apteva ( talk) 05:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Support In the absence of a naming conflict, prefer the more concise name. -- BDD ( talk) 20:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Support moves to Nebraska Initiative Measure 416 and Colorado Amendment 43, and alternative proposal to move to Arizona Constitution Article 30. The current formats are completely contrary to our naming conventions, see particularly WP:Precision and WP:DAB. Andrewa ( talk) 06:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Oppose to Arizona Constitution Article 30. Three original proposals are fine. Ron 1987 ( talk) 07:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• See also Talk:Arizona Proposition 200 (2004)#Move? – Wbm1058 ( talk) 15:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• see: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Requested moves – this discussion needs moved to a higher level. Wbm1058 ( talk) 18:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Support; much better fit for our article title criteria, and there's nothing to disambiguate... bobrayner ( talk) 22:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Support, disambiguation seems unneeded. Insomesia ( talk) 00:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Comment Nebraska and Colorado moved, waiting on CSD on Arizona to complete moves. Tiggerjay ( talk) 07:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.