![]() | Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
November 23, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Israeli
Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law was intended to punish Holocaust survivors rather than Holocaust perpetrators? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
I found the following journal article online, and finished populating the {{ cite journal}} template:
It explicitly mentions Dominic Ongwen but does not mention Omar Khadr. Geo Swan ( talk) 14:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
The vast majority of Jews agree that kapos were pure evil traitors who deserved to be hanged. They weren't bullied into betraying and murdering their own; rather, they were psychopaths who got a power trip out of it. Describing them in the introduction to this article and on the Main Page of the entire site itself as "Holocaust survivors" when they were in fact perpetrators is typical of the leftist trash and lies that infest this Marxist, anti-Semitic cesspit of an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.144.178.223 ( talk) 08:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Danielyng ( talk · contribs) 20:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
I am notifying you of my intentions to start reviewing this Article for Good Article status. Expect a full review to be out in a week at most, probably either tomorrow or Friday.
Danielyng (
talk)
20:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
My initial thoughts are that this is a well-written article, including ample citations w/o original research, but there are a lot of Red Links, which I would recommend clearing up.
Well written:
Verifiable with no original research:
Broad in its coverage:
Neutral:
Stable:
Illustrated: if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Well Written:
The prose of the
Article is clear, and well written. It is understandable for a broad audience.
The information is sourced from reputable institutions. There is no original research.
The article addresses the main aspects of the topic and stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
No edit warring going on.
Illustrated with ample amount of media.
The article is Neutral.
Danielyng (
talk)
21:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
‘The law is not enacted only for practical purposes,’’ said Knesset Member Yosef Lamm, who was soon to sit on the bench in several of the trials, but ‘‘as a teaching device and cultural document. I don’t want people in 50–60 years’ time to go looking for the text of Section 214 [on the murder of Jews]. This is a unique law which I believe should be studied in every country, and they should know what it refers to.’’ —Zertal p. 65
( t · c) buidhe 02:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Please cite the claim that death sentence is "mandatory"; see Article 35 of חוק העונשין. 79.177.70.1 ( talk) 10:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
I only write what it says in reliable secondary sources. The cited sources do say that there is a mandatory death sentence. I suppose it is possible that they are wrong, but you would need to find equally reliable sources contradicting the point. ( t · c) buidhe 18:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
November 23, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Israeli
Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law was intended to punish Holocaust survivors rather than Holocaust perpetrators? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I found the following journal article online, and finished populating the {{ cite journal}} template:
It explicitly mentions Dominic Ongwen but does not mention Omar Khadr. Geo Swan ( talk) 14:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
The vast majority of Jews agree that kapos were pure evil traitors who deserved to be hanged. They weren't bullied into betraying and murdering their own; rather, they were psychopaths who got a power trip out of it. Describing them in the introduction to this article and on the Main Page of the entire site itself as "Holocaust survivors" when they were in fact perpetrators is typical of the leftist trash and lies that infest this Marxist, anti-Semitic cesspit of an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.144.178.223 ( talk) 08:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Danielyng ( talk · contribs) 20:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
I am notifying you of my intentions to start reviewing this Article for Good Article status. Expect a full review to be out in a week at most, probably either tomorrow or Friday.
Danielyng (
talk)
20:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
My initial thoughts are that this is a well-written article, including ample citations w/o original research, but there are a lot of Red Links, which I would recommend clearing up.
Well written:
Verifiable with no original research:
Broad in its coverage:
Neutral:
Stable:
Illustrated: if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Well Written:
The prose of the
Article is clear, and well written. It is understandable for a broad audience.
The information is sourced from reputable institutions. There is no original research.
The article addresses the main aspects of the topic and stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
No edit warring going on.
Illustrated with ample amount of media.
The article is Neutral.
Danielyng (
talk)
21:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
‘The law is not enacted only for practical purposes,’’ said Knesset Member Yosef Lamm, who was soon to sit on the bench in several of the trials, but ‘‘as a teaching device and cultural document. I don’t want people in 50–60 years’ time to go looking for the text of Section 214 [on the murder of Jews]. This is a unique law which I believe should be studied in every country, and they should know what it refers to.’’ —Zertal p. 65
( t · c) buidhe 02:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Please cite the claim that death sentence is "mandatory"; see Article 35 of חוק העונשין. 79.177.70.1 ( talk) 10:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
I only write what it says in reliable secondary sources. The cited sources do say that there is a mandatory death sentence. I suppose it is possible that they are wrong, but you would need to find equally reliable sources contradicting the point. ( t · c) buidhe 18:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)