This article is written in American English with IUPAC spelling (color, defense, traveled; aluminium, sulfur and caesium) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide and chemistry naming conventions, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Natural fiber article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
In the final section of the stub, 'Mineral Fibers', the basis of categorization is not obvious, nor is the source from which the categorization has been reproduced named. Perhaps someone could check up on that and mention the basis of categorization as well as the source. This section further names the contributer and the company which he belongs to. I am sure that is against the rules. So, I deleted the name. Priyatu 10:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I have just copyedited the page, but more work could still be used. I'm going to keep this tagged as a page that needs copyediting.
Seeking info about tensile strength of specific fibers. Had to delete remark about bast fibers having greater tensile strength, as leaf fibers from some plants are stronger than bast fibers from other plants; It may well be that the source of the strongest natural fiber are the bast fibers of a specific plant, but that is a different remark. GeeBee60 ( talk) 19:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Important of natural protein fiber 2409:4042:906:1C8:E2B5:442:F95B:C10C ( talk) 14:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This article is written in American English with IUPAC spelling (color, defense, traveled; aluminium, sulfur and caesium) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide and chemistry naming conventions, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Natural fiber article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
In the final section of the stub, 'Mineral Fibers', the basis of categorization is not obvious, nor is the source from which the categorization has been reproduced named. Perhaps someone could check up on that and mention the basis of categorization as well as the source. This section further names the contributer and the company which he belongs to. I am sure that is against the rules. So, I deleted the name. Priyatu 10:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I have just copyedited the page, but more work could still be used. I'm going to keep this tagged as a page that needs copyediting.
Seeking info about tensile strength of specific fibers. Had to delete remark about bast fibers having greater tensile strength, as leaf fibers from some plants are stronger than bast fibers from other plants; It may well be that the source of the strongest natural fiber are the bast fibers of a specific plant, but that is a different remark. GeeBee60 ( talk) 19:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Important of natural protein fiber 2409:4042:906:1C8:E2B5:442:F95B:C10C ( talk) 14:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)