![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nothing on the National University of Health Sciences page falls under the verifiability critera - "Attribute all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged to a reliable, published source ". What info on the NUHS page is challengeable? Wiki has this to say about reliability "self-published sources can sometimes be used as sources of information about themselves". When you have autobiographical info about an organization that is not "likely to be challenged". MrBill's undoing my change to the NUHS page is not supportable. I suggest he read the Wiki references he quoted in his "undo" of the changes I made to that page 108.39.67.66 ( talk) 10:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on National University of Health Sciences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nothing on the National University of Health Sciences page falls under the verifiability critera - "Attribute all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged to a reliable, published source ". What info on the NUHS page is challengeable? Wiki has this to say about reliability "self-published sources can sometimes be used as sources of information about themselves". When you have autobiographical info about an organization that is not "likely to be challenged". MrBill's undoing my change to the NUHS page is not supportable. I suggest he read the Wiki references he quoted in his "undo" of the changes I made to that page 108.39.67.66 ( talk) 10:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on National University of Health Sciences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)