This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the following image from the article as there where too many for the size of article. Please feel free to re-add it if the article length warrants it. -- Martyman- (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
The section on the achitecture of the building avoids mention of the controversies associated with the braille panels as per Miranda Devine [1] and the references to the holocaust as per Windschuttle [2] plus the accusations of plagiarism [3]. Any other views before I start adding these in?-- A Y Arktos\ talk 10:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I think the much greater need is to work up the facts of what the museum design is, before adding more about how it might be interpreted or controversies in its reception. Basic facts. E.g. the correct spelling of the architect's name; that the 'architect' was a firm (ARM) not just one person; that the 'Garden of Australian Dreams' (with the 'blue poles')is the design of eminently name-able landscape architects. Etc. R Jones 08:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Need to add difficulties with deciphering meaning, for example in Garden of Australian Dreams [4] and deciphering post-modernist meaning [5]-- A Y Arktos\ talk 13:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
More on post-modernism and the museum [6] plus Museum board claimed they didn't know of Libiskind reference. [7]-- A Y Arktos\ talk 13:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.-- A Y Arktos\ talk 09:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Museum of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the following image from the article as there where too many for the size of article. Please feel free to re-add it if the article length warrants it. -- Martyman- (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
The section on the achitecture of the building avoids mention of the controversies associated with the braille panels as per Miranda Devine [1] and the references to the holocaust as per Windschuttle [2] plus the accusations of plagiarism [3]. Any other views before I start adding these in?-- A Y Arktos\ talk 10:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I think the much greater need is to work up the facts of what the museum design is, before adding more about how it might be interpreted or controversies in its reception. Basic facts. E.g. the correct spelling of the architect's name; that the 'architect' was a firm (ARM) not just one person; that the 'Garden of Australian Dreams' (with the 'blue poles')is the design of eminently name-able landscape architects. Etc. R Jones 08:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Need to add difficulties with deciphering meaning, for example in Garden of Australian Dreams [4] and deciphering post-modernist meaning [5]-- A Y Arktos\ talk 13:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
More on post-modernism and the museum [6] plus Museum board claimed they didn't know of Libiskind reference. [7]-- A Y Arktos\ talk 13:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.-- A Y Arktos\ talk 09:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Museum of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)