This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please tell me what to do to improve this so it doesn't get deleted or rejected —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.54.67.93 ( talk • contribs)
Thanks, I'll change the wording. Anything else? As for notability, I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean. 85.169.197.141 ( talk) 10:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I can't seem to accept the page. Wikipedia says that my account is too new. Can someone else do it? Every single box seems to have been checked, and I can't see any reason not to accept the article. If you do not feel that it is ready to be accepted, could you tell me why, and what has to be done to improve it further? Zbanochkou ( talk) 14:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For the image, I'll upload it today. 85.169.197.141 ( talk) 10:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The page has been edited and updated. What still has to be done to make it good enough to be posted as a normal wikipedia entry? 193.54.67.93 ( talk) 08:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Put in references to four articles as of notability (see most recent changes). Is the page good enough now to warrant article status on Wikipedia? If not, what still has to be done? Zbanochkou ( talk) 11:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Zbanochkou ( talk)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please tell me what to do to improve this so it doesn't get deleted or rejected —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.54.67.93 ( talk • contribs)
Thanks, I'll change the wording. Anything else? As for notability, I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean. 85.169.197.141 ( talk) 10:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I can't seem to accept the page. Wikipedia says that my account is too new. Can someone else do it? Every single box seems to have been checked, and I can't see any reason not to accept the article. If you do not feel that it is ready to be accepted, could you tell me why, and what has to be done to improve it further? Zbanochkou ( talk) 14:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For the image, I'll upload it today. 85.169.197.141 ( talk) 10:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The page has been edited and updated. What still has to be done to make it good enough to be posted as a normal wikipedia entry? 193.54.67.93 ( talk) 08:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Put in references to four articles as of notability (see most recent changes). Is the page good enough now to warrant article status on Wikipedia? If not, what still has to be done? Zbanochkou ( talk) 11:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Zbanochkou ( talk)