This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Holidays: Christmas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Christmas task force.

An unregistered user ( at 125.164.35.71) added the category "Fictional orcas" to this article today. I removed this as it seemed inappropriate - although I may have been too hasty??? The movie Namu... is a story about a marine biologist, some fishermen and townsfolk and their encounter with a fictional orca "Namu" who was played by the real-life orca, " Namu." I see the same user has today added this "Fictional orcas" category to other movie (fictional) articles about orcas: Free Willy; Orca (film); TV anime ( Tico of the Seven Seas); and other tenuously-related articles (e.g. Torca, a ( Transformers) General who turns into a monster that is a combination of elephant and orca; Kyogre, a Pokémon character vaguely related to an orca; and Orca (comics) a DC Comics hybrid human/orca-like villain). I think the category itself is unnecessary - or, at best, the title is a bit mis-guided. A category title like "orcas in fiction" might have been a better / more useful choice. I apologize if my deletion was too hasty or insufficiently justified but I will leave it to other editors to restore (or not) the categorization. Pugetbill ( talk) 17:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC) reply