![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
It really needs some severe clarification. As is, it borders on the nonsensical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.72.75.236 ( talk) 06:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
This article needs desperately to clearly situate the Name of the Father in the symbolic. Phil Sandifer 21:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
This talk page desperately needs to avoid the use of split infinitives. Alex Smith 00:13, 7 August 2006
The article desperately needs to clearly show that people are able to really take any of this seriously. It needs to actually convince the reader that this is for real. (Which of course it isn't.) 131.111.8.96 00:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Line 2 of this article clearly situates the Name of the Father in the Symbolic. Please read carefully before disputing.
Knulclunk, you said that there is a lot of things you do not understand on the article. Many of the complicated terms (that are VERY complicated) are linked. The Name of the Father is closely related to Semiotics and the language of signs and codes and the signifier and signified. Again these are complicated terms and understanding this article requires understanding of semiotics. If after reading those articles you still have problems comprehending the terms please inform me which need to be explained in layman terms and I will do what I can (keep in mind that I am not a psychoanalytic psychologist). Because of the antagonism most in psychology have toward both Freud and Lacan, there are very few wikipedia users out there who are willing to devote time to making comprehensive articles on these terms so I can imagine that the linked articles are not as comprehensive as one would like, so I completely understand if, after reading all the linked articles, you do not understand the terms. But. since semiotics is linked in the article and the semiotics article is very comprehensive, there is absolutely no need for a context template. -- Thaddius 20:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
As for the French bit at the end, Lacan was French so, yes, Nom du père is the original. -- Thaddius 00:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that in Judeo-Christian religion, the Name of the Father is Abba (see God the Father). The Gospel of Mark records that Jesus used the term Abba when praying to Jehovah God during His Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane shortly before His Crucifixion. This name could have some meaning in Lacan's language theory. ADM ( talk) 12:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
It sounds like whoever wrote this page didn't actually know what the Name of the Father is supposed to be. Madler ( talk) 03:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
It really needs some severe clarification. As is, it borders on the nonsensical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.72.75.236 ( talk) 06:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
This article needs desperately to clearly situate the Name of the Father in the symbolic. Phil Sandifer 21:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
This talk page desperately needs to avoid the use of split infinitives. Alex Smith 00:13, 7 August 2006
The article desperately needs to clearly show that people are able to really take any of this seriously. It needs to actually convince the reader that this is for real. (Which of course it isn't.) 131.111.8.96 00:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Line 2 of this article clearly situates the Name of the Father in the Symbolic. Please read carefully before disputing.
Knulclunk, you said that there is a lot of things you do not understand on the article. Many of the complicated terms (that are VERY complicated) are linked. The Name of the Father is closely related to Semiotics and the language of signs and codes and the signifier and signified. Again these are complicated terms and understanding this article requires understanding of semiotics. If after reading those articles you still have problems comprehending the terms please inform me which need to be explained in layman terms and I will do what I can (keep in mind that I am not a psychoanalytic psychologist). Because of the antagonism most in psychology have toward both Freud and Lacan, there are very few wikipedia users out there who are willing to devote time to making comprehensive articles on these terms so I can imagine that the linked articles are not as comprehensive as one would like, so I completely understand if, after reading all the linked articles, you do not understand the terms. But. since semiotics is linked in the article and the semiotics article is very comprehensive, there is absolutely no need for a context template. -- Thaddius 20:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
As for the French bit at the end, Lacan was French so, yes, Nom du père is the original. -- Thaddius 00:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that in Judeo-Christian religion, the Name of the Father is Abba (see God the Father). The Gospel of Mark records that Jesus used the term Abba when praying to Jehovah God during His Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane shortly before His Crucifixion. This name could have some meaning in Lacan's language theory. ADM ( talk) 12:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
It sounds like whoever wrote this page didn't actually know what the Name of the Father is supposed to be. Madler ( talk) 03:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)