![]() | A news item involving Naga, Cebu was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 September 2018. | ![]() |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Naga, Cebu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Barangay Uling of the city of Naga, Cebu is one of the farthest inland barangay of the city located 28 kilometer from the midtown. The barangay is also very accessible to any kind of vehicles being situated along the Naga-Toledo Road and bounded in the west by Toledo City and the famous Atlas Mining Development Corporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlbaylosis ( talk • contribs) 08:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
User:Unbuttered Parsnip, Why do you keep on reverting my edits even if it's stated in the source provided? You reverted my edits 3 times. 21:16, 22 December 2015 (PST)
User:Unbuttered Parsnip has tagged the Economy section for Copyright problem when in fact the text has been modified from the source to achieve an encyclopedic tone as it complies with
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout. I believe the user took it personally from me after Admin
User:EdJohnston blocked him/her from edit warring on this article. It was I who reported the user for violation of 3RR. If you take a look at this link:
http://www.philstar.com/business-usual/2012/06/25/820966/economic-boom-brings-prosperity-cebus-new-cities , you will clearly see my point and for that I strongly believe I haven't violated any copyright issues or whatsoever. Additionally,
User:Unbuttered Parsnip haven't left any note on this talk page to why the section should be considered a copyright violation. User never made an attempt to resolve dispute on this article's talk page and has been attacking editors personally just like what the user did here:
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Feel free to notify me if there would be any disputes. Thank you so much.
–
HavenHost (
talk)
05:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Suspected IP sockpuppets of User:Unbuttered Parsnip:
These IP users refuse to discuss on talk page. One IP violates Wikipedia:Civility, as well as WP:NPA as can be seen here: User_talk:112.198.82.55.
~ HavenHost ( talk) 05:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.philstar.com/business-usual/2012/06/25/820966/economic-boom-brings-prosperity-cebus-new-cities. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Upon investigating on the link, it was found to be a link to an external blog and does not focus on the City of Naga, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerozeke ( talk • contribs) 15:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | A news item involving Naga, Cebu was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 September 2018. | ![]() |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Naga, Cebu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Barangay Uling of the city of Naga, Cebu is one of the farthest inland barangay of the city located 28 kilometer from the midtown. The barangay is also very accessible to any kind of vehicles being situated along the Naga-Toledo Road and bounded in the west by Toledo City and the famous Atlas Mining Development Corporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlbaylosis ( talk • contribs) 08:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
User:Unbuttered Parsnip, Why do you keep on reverting my edits even if it's stated in the source provided? You reverted my edits 3 times. 21:16, 22 December 2015 (PST)
User:Unbuttered Parsnip has tagged the Economy section for Copyright problem when in fact the text has been modified from the source to achieve an encyclopedic tone as it complies with
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout. I believe the user took it personally from me after Admin
User:EdJohnston blocked him/her from edit warring on this article. It was I who reported the user for violation of 3RR. If you take a look at this link:
http://www.philstar.com/business-usual/2012/06/25/820966/economic-boom-brings-prosperity-cebus-new-cities , you will clearly see my point and for that I strongly believe I haven't violated any copyright issues or whatsoever. Additionally,
User:Unbuttered Parsnip haven't left any note on this talk page to why the section should be considered a copyright violation. User never made an attempt to resolve dispute on this article's talk page and has been attacking editors personally just like what the user did here:
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Feel free to notify me if there would be any disputes. Thank you so much.
–
HavenHost (
talk)
05:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Suspected IP sockpuppets of User:Unbuttered Parsnip:
These IP users refuse to discuss on talk page. One IP violates Wikipedia:Civility, as well as WP:NPA as can be seen here: User_talk:112.198.82.55.
~ HavenHost ( talk) 05:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.philstar.com/business-usual/2012/06/25/820966/economic-boom-brings-prosperity-cebus-new-cities. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Upon investigating on the link, it was found to be a link to an external blog and does not focus on the City of Naga, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerozeke ( talk • contribs) 15:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)