![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could somebody please correct the atrocious English used in this article? There is no semblance of any sentence structure or grammar and quite a few misspelt words. 117.195.153.98 ( talk) 06:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Oranjelo100, why did you move the page? There only a couple of sources for the "renaming" and most sources continue to use the name Nag. Even assuming that it was officially renamed, we should continue using the old name per WP:COMMONNAME as most reliable sources are still use the name "Nag". — Gazoth ( talk) 16:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Official name is Prospina. Oranjelo100 ( talk) 16:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Well, I'm for leaving it as Propspina because multiple articles say it got renamed. Even if more articles still call it Nag, I don't think commmonname is that important in this case because it's not widely known under either of these names in English speaking countries. Oranjelo100 ( talk) 17:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Somebody please create a new Article for Man Portable Anti-tank Guided Missile. This is deserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhavafro ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Is it necessary to use a media coined term in Wikipedia? If not, why has the missile been described as “long delayed” here in Wikipedia. Also, the hit probability of the missile has improved to 0.9 after testing. Why is it necessary to mention the older hit probability of 0.77 as well as 0.9?
The English used in this Article is pathetic. (No offence) Vaibhavafro ( talk 3:13 PM, 13 Aug 2019
Thanks Streamline8988 for your recent edits. I think that a more recent source for the hit probability is needed. It must have had improved further. 0.9 is not that good. Till then we’ll stick to 0.9. Vaibhavafro ( talk) 2:33 PM, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could somebody please correct the atrocious English used in this article? There is no semblance of any sentence structure or grammar and quite a few misspelt words. 117.195.153.98 ( talk) 06:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Oranjelo100, why did you move the page? There only a couple of sources for the "renaming" and most sources continue to use the name Nag. Even assuming that it was officially renamed, we should continue using the old name per WP:COMMONNAME as most reliable sources are still use the name "Nag". — Gazoth ( talk) 16:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Official name is Prospina. Oranjelo100 ( talk) 16:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Well, I'm for leaving it as Propspina because multiple articles say it got renamed. Even if more articles still call it Nag, I don't think commmonname is that important in this case because it's not widely known under either of these names in English speaking countries. Oranjelo100 ( talk) 17:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Somebody please create a new Article for Man Portable Anti-tank Guided Missile. This is deserved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhavafro ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Is it necessary to use a media coined term in Wikipedia? If not, why has the missile been described as “long delayed” here in Wikipedia. Also, the hit probability of the missile has improved to 0.9 after testing. Why is it necessary to mention the older hit probability of 0.77 as well as 0.9?
The English used in this Article is pathetic. (No offence) Vaibhavafro ( talk 3:13 PM, 13 Aug 2019
Thanks Streamline8988 for your recent edits. I think that a more recent source for the hit probability is needed. It must have had improved further. 0.9 is not that good. Till then we’ll stick to 0.9. Vaibhavafro ( talk) 2:33 PM, 16 August 2019 (UTC)