This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NV is al legal entity in Aruba too; if I'm not mistaken. Grandmaster e 13:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
There are substantial differences in governance between Dutch and Belgian NVs. The Dutch NV usually has a supervisory board, whereas the Belgian NV does not. The NV form in the Netherlands is restricted to large enterprises, and the BV form is more current, whereas in Belgium the NV form is used widely and the BVBA form is used mainly by family firms and as an alternative to the partnership. Furthermore recent developments have meant that not all Belgian NVs are truly public, in that restrictions on the transmission of their shares mean that these are effectively close companies. These means that it is impossible to say whether an NV is a plc or an llc until one has read the articles of association. Following changes in regulations (primarily to combat money laundering and tax evasion) the unregistered share is disappearing. This does not however affect the ability of the shareholder to trade his shares. Everybody got to be somewhere! ( talk) 15:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
This page "Naamloze vennootschap" says that the correct abbreviation for NV is actually 'nv' (lowercase with no punctuation). Is there any citation for this? The KLM page for example uses 'N.V.' in the first line. I feel like there should be some standardization. 199.230.11.88 ( talk) 02:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NV is al legal entity in Aruba too; if I'm not mistaken. Grandmaster e 13:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
There are substantial differences in governance between Dutch and Belgian NVs. The Dutch NV usually has a supervisory board, whereas the Belgian NV does not. The NV form in the Netherlands is restricted to large enterprises, and the BV form is more current, whereas in Belgium the NV form is used widely and the BVBA form is used mainly by family firms and as an alternative to the partnership. Furthermore recent developments have meant that not all Belgian NVs are truly public, in that restrictions on the transmission of their shares mean that these are effectively close companies. These means that it is impossible to say whether an NV is a plc or an llc until one has read the articles of association. Following changes in regulations (primarily to combat money laundering and tax evasion) the unregistered share is disappearing. This does not however affect the ability of the shareholder to trade his shares. Everybody got to be somewhere! ( talk) 15:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
This page "Naamloze vennootschap" says that the correct abbreviation for NV is actually 'nv' (lowercase with no punctuation). Is there any citation for this? The KLM page for example uses 'N.V.' in the first line. I feel like there should be some standardization. 199.230.11.88 ( talk) 02:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)