![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • NCT 2020 Resonance Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:NCT 2020 Resonance |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the NCT 2020 Resonance Pt. 2 page were merged into NCT 2020 Resonance on 07 August 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Should we consolidate the two pages? Resonance Pt. 2 is a repackage of Resonance, right? We can just consolidate them together and add a second track listing to the page. 41matt14 ( talk) 22:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
I think it's better to separate them/not combine them. The Part 2 is not advertised as a repackage, like Neo Zone of NCT 127 (where in its wiki article, the first issue and the repackage of the album is merged). Hiroctzen ( talk) 06:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Edit: Tho Pt. 2 is not advertised as a repackage, I think it will be good (somehow) to merge the Pt. 2 in Pt. 1 and so that we can put the new single "RESONANCE" which acts as the finale of the Resonance album. My concerns now would be the article, for instance— the album sales, will you guys put it on the re-issue section or not? And general details for the Pt. 2 will not appear on google search results because it is merged with Pt. 1 article. What do you guys think? Hiroctzen ( talk) 06:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm still new to wikipedia, on how to maneuver, manage and/or arrange an article. But if you(and other editors/contributors) think that merging them is a good thing to do then, we should perform it? Hiroctzen ( talk) 05:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Created a new discussion on Pt. 1 article but no one answered yet. I think its better to merge them and rename the article as "NCT 2020 Resonance". As I said on the discussion on the Pt. 1 article, some things are redundant for both articles like the music show wins and year-end lists— we can solge this by merging the two. On NCT's discography, we will not put the Pt. 2 on re-issue (Pt. 1 and Pt. 2 will stay on Studio Albums), but the page will be redirected to NCT 2020 Resonance (if the merge will happen). Also with this merge, I think we can put the RESONANCE single that wraps up the whole RESONANCE album/promotion. I wish there will be more people who could decide and help us with the change. What do you think? Hiroctzen ( talk) 09:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
On the other hand, Part 2 is more of a repackage of part one, and it doesn't make sense to count it as its own separate studio album. So a merge could potentially help with that. - K-popguardian ( talk) 18:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Hiroctzen: @ 41matt14: @ EN-Jungwon: @ PeaceNT: Just noticed on some music pages Resonance Pt. 2 is marked as "The 2nd album" but part 1 isn't. I think this is a Seoulite or Coup de'tat or Never Gonna Dance Again situation. If that's the case, the pages should be merged since these are both separate parts of the 2nd album, with Pt 2 being officially marked as the complete 2nd part. - K-popguardian ( talk) 19:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • NCT 2020 Resonance Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:NCT 2020 Resonance |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the NCT 2020 Resonance Pt. 2 page were merged into NCT 2020 Resonance on 07 August 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Should we consolidate the two pages? Resonance Pt. 2 is a repackage of Resonance, right? We can just consolidate them together and add a second track listing to the page. 41matt14 ( talk) 22:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
I think it's better to separate them/not combine them. The Part 2 is not advertised as a repackage, like Neo Zone of NCT 127 (where in its wiki article, the first issue and the repackage of the album is merged). Hiroctzen ( talk) 06:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Edit: Tho Pt. 2 is not advertised as a repackage, I think it will be good (somehow) to merge the Pt. 2 in Pt. 1 and so that we can put the new single "RESONANCE" which acts as the finale of the Resonance album. My concerns now would be the article, for instance— the album sales, will you guys put it on the re-issue section or not? And general details for the Pt. 2 will not appear on google search results because it is merged with Pt. 1 article. What do you guys think? Hiroctzen ( talk) 06:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm still new to wikipedia, on how to maneuver, manage and/or arrange an article. But if you(and other editors/contributors) think that merging them is a good thing to do then, we should perform it? Hiroctzen ( talk) 05:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Created a new discussion on Pt. 1 article but no one answered yet. I think its better to merge them and rename the article as "NCT 2020 Resonance". As I said on the discussion on the Pt. 1 article, some things are redundant for both articles like the music show wins and year-end lists— we can solge this by merging the two. On NCT's discography, we will not put the Pt. 2 on re-issue (Pt. 1 and Pt. 2 will stay on Studio Albums), but the page will be redirected to NCT 2020 Resonance (if the merge will happen). Also with this merge, I think we can put the RESONANCE single that wraps up the whole RESONANCE album/promotion. I wish there will be more people who could decide and help us with the change. What do you think? Hiroctzen ( talk) 09:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
On the other hand, Part 2 is more of a repackage of part one, and it doesn't make sense to count it as its own separate studio album. So a merge could potentially help with that. - K-popguardian ( talk) 18:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Hiroctzen: @ 41matt14: @ EN-Jungwon: @ PeaceNT: Just noticed on some music pages Resonance Pt. 2 is marked as "The 2nd album" but part 1 isn't. I think this is a Seoulite or Coup de'tat or Never Gonna Dance Again situation. If that's the case, the pages should be merged since these are both separate parts of the 2nd album, with Pt 2 being officially marked as the complete 2nd part. - K-popguardian ( talk) 19:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)