The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
N. Chandrababu Naidu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
@ Chinnusaikrish Why did you revert my edits as well as that of the other editor? I did not remove any incidents or present anything in a substantively different way. Those were simple incremental edits meant to improve structure. Very very little was removed by myself, such as the word "miserably" which is unencyclopedic WP:TONE. Please restore all those edits of mine which you don't actually object to, and we will discuss those that you do object to. Regards — Alalch E. 18:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
@ ChinnusaikrishThe tone that you added is clearly disruptive and is not according to the concensus. Most of the sources you cited belong to unreliable websites- not secured as per Wikipedia. There's clearly no point of neutrality. Other sources are mere political statements by people from other parties as part of political allegations cannot be taken as souces. There must be strong evidence of secondary sources. 456legend( talk) 18:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
hello @ User:Alalch E., I reverted his edits as of now again. We will wait from hom to discuss. 456legend( talk) 18:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Chandrababu Naidu who had just escaped from an assination attempt thought of having an advantage of sympathy.-- I completely agree with your removal. That is an example of the prohibited practice of original synthesis. — Alalch E. 17:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
@
456legend: Your major rewrite of the whole article, while probably good in various parts seems to have removed all criticism of Naidu which is against
WP:NPOV; please remake this change in a series of incremental edits (section by section) so it's easier to review; some references were removed too such as
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/chandrababu-naidus-son-nara-lokesh-takes-oath-as-minister/article17762250.ece
Sincerely. —
Alalch E.
12:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Alalch E., I have added the criticism part again as a separate section since the previous editor removed the other content. I am still in the process of correcting the data after the analysis of the sources since most of the sources were not claiming any statements. 456legend( talk) 13:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Alalch E. ( talk · contribs) I grouped them because the information was not consistent with any of the categories present. None of the sources actually put forward those particular statements that is present in criticism, but just give a cite about the info. But I ensured to not delete the consistent information for example: the defeat in the 2009 and the backlash from farmers, the criticism of the Opposition and also the cash for vote scam. I haven't removed any of them because it was consistent with the information and was very much neutral like any other wiki article. Anyways you are free to add any further criticism if necessary citations are available and also you are allowed to de-integrate the grouped criticism and add it in the other categories if you feel they are consistent. Other than this, the rest of the info that I have added is sourced content that has been removed unexplained 1 month ago. I hope you analysize the edit history and the article and reach me out for any discussion or concensus if required. 456legend( talk) 17:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Page is full of misleads and previous pages are removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhal.sasthry ( talk • contribs) 06:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Chandrababu Naidu's involvement in national politics during an era dominated by non-Congress coalition politics in Delhi is notable. [1] In the aftermath of the 1996 parliamentary elections, he assumed the role of convenor for the United Front, a coalition comprising 13 political parties that secured power at the Centre. The coalition government was headed by H.D. Deve Gowda and later I.K. Gujral between 1996 and 1998. The United Front had its headquarters at Andhra Pradesh Bhavan in New Delhi.
Subsequently, Chandrababu Naidu's significance in national affairs amplified after the 1999 Lok Sabha elections.The TDP and the BJP, which had a pre-poll understanding in the state, together won 36 MPs out of 42. [2] The BJP emerged as the largest single party in the Lok Sabha. The TDP extended the support of 29 of its MPs to the National Democratic Alliance government headed by A.B.Vajpayee. [3] TDP did not join the government, extending only ‘issue-based support’. [4] Naidu claimed that though Vajpayee offered eight cabinet berths to his party, the TDP stayed away from the union cabinet and offered external support. [5] Salivahana ( talk) 16:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
References
Alalch E. Seems u mistook and didn't clearly follow my explanation. I don't intend to present anything in a negative tone but rather in the present status and position of a politician. A politician's recent major electoral achievement or debacle has to be established which were present in my edits. This has nothing to do with the violation of the policy as a politician holds a position in the governmental/public activity. So that has to be represented for a clear understanding of his present status which I did. The lead section added by you has no citations and many of it are way out of context.
Some of it follows: He directed the founding of HITEC city which is false as that was inaugurated and directed by former CM Janardhan Reddy. You even added a sentence about directing the construction of new capital city which is not yet completed or in the mid-way and the matter is sub-judice in the court. These are not needed since they had already been present in the page's respective sections. Mine looks crisp and up to the point. ~ Chinnusaikrish ( talk) 07:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Someone restore to the last incumbent office until 12 June immediately EntrepreneurPedia ( talk) 07:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
N. Chandrababu Naidu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
@ Chinnusaikrish Why did you revert my edits as well as that of the other editor? I did not remove any incidents or present anything in a substantively different way. Those were simple incremental edits meant to improve structure. Very very little was removed by myself, such as the word "miserably" which is unencyclopedic WP:TONE. Please restore all those edits of mine which you don't actually object to, and we will discuss those that you do object to. Regards — Alalch E. 18:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
@ ChinnusaikrishThe tone that you added is clearly disruptive and is not according to the concensus. Most of the sources you cited belong to unreliable websites- not secured as per Wikipedia. There's clearly no point of neutrality. Other sources are mere political statements by people from other parties as part of political allegations cannot be taken as souces. There must be strong evidence of secondary sources. 456legend( talk) 18:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
hello @ User:Alalch E., I reverted his edits as of now again. We will wait from hom to discuss. 456legend( talk) 18:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Chandrababu Naidu who had just escaped from an assination attempt thought of having an advantage of sympathy.-- I completely agree with your removal. That is an example of the prohibited practice of original synthesis. — Alalch E. 17:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
@
456legend: Your major rewrite of the whole article, while probably good in various parts seems to have removed all criticism of Naidu which is against
WP:NPOV; please remake this change in a series of incremental edits (section by section) so it's easier to review; some references were removed too such as
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/chandrababu-naidus-son-nara-lokesh-takes-oath-as-minister/article17762250.ece
Sincerely. —
Alalch E.
12:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Alalch E., I have added the criticism part again as a separate section since the previous editor removed the other content. I am still in the process of correcting the data after the analysis of the sources since most of the sources were not claiming any statements. 456legend( talk) 13:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Alalch E. ( talk · contribs) I grouped them because the information was not consistent with any of the categories present. None of the sources actually put forward those particular statements that is present in criticism, but just give a cite about the info. But I ensured to not delete the consistent information for example: the defeat in the 2009 and the backlash from farmers, the criticism of the Opposition and also the cash for vote scam. I haven't removed any of them because it was consistent with the information and was very much neutral like any other wiki article. Anyways you are free to add any further criticism if necessary citations are available and also you are allowed to de-integrate the grouped criticism and add it in the other categories if you feel they are consistent. Other than this, the rest of the info that I have added is sourced content that has been removed unexplained 1 month ago. I hope you analysize the edit history and the article and reach me out for any discussion or concensus if required. 456legend( talk) 17:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Page is full of misleads and previous pages are removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhal.sasthry ( talk • contribs) 06:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Chandrababu Naidu's involvement in national politics during an era dominated by non-Congress coalition politics in Delhi is notable. [1] In the aftermath of the 1996 parliamentary elections, he assumed the role of convenor for the United Front, a coalition comprising 13 political parties that secured power at the Centre. The coalition government was headed by H.D. Deve Gowda and later I.K. Gujral between 1996 and 1998. The United Front had its headquarters at Andhra Pradesh Bhavan in New Delhi.
Subsequently, Chandrababu Naidu's significance in national affairs amplified after the 1999 Lok Sabha elections.The TDP and the BJP, which had a pre-poll understanding in the state, together won 36 MPs out of 42. [2] The BJP emerged as the largest single party in the Lok Sabha. The TDP extended the support of 29 of its MPs to the National Democratic Alliance government headed by A.B.Vajpayee. [3] TDP did not join the government, extending only ‘issue-based support’. [4] Naidu claimed that though Vajpayee offered eight cabinet berths to his party, the TDP stayed away from the union cabinet and offered external support. [5] Salivahana ( talk) 16:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
References
Alalch E. Seems u mistook and didn't clearly follow my explanation. I don't intend to present anything in a negative tone but rather in the present status and position of a politician. A politician's recent major electoral achievement or debacle has to be established which were present in my edits. This has nothing to do with the violation of the policy as a politician holds a position in the governmental/public activity. So that has to be represented for a clear understanding of his present status which I did. The lead section added by you has no citations and many of it are way out of context.
Some of it follows: He directed the founding of HITEC city which is false as that was inaugurated and directed by former CM Janardhan Reddy. You even added a sentence about directing the construction of new capital city which is not yet completed or in the mid-way and the matter is sub-judice in the court. These are not needed since they had already been present in the page's respective sections. Mine looks crisp and up to the point. ~ Chinnusaikrish ( talk) 07:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Someone restore to the last incumbent office until 12 June immediately EntrepreneurPedia ( talk) 07:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)