![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Removed Air Defense paragraph which was a repeat, probably due to cut and paste errors.
Removed the following statement from Air Defense: "With the introduction of new radar systems and Mobile Guided Surface to Air Missiles systems, MIADS become of the most advanced AD systems in the region. Many young officers have also done several Air Defence Training courses in Russia, Ukraine, China and Serbia."
Paragraph is not objective. Most advanced AD system in the region compared with which country? How about it's neighbor, India ?
Koxinga CDF 14:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Region defined, yet the key issue is the statement the most advanced in the region. It is too subjective, considering that the MIAD is fairly new, that Malaysia has been host to the Five Powers Defense Arrangement Integrated Air Defense System out of Butterworth, Penang since the 1970s and Thailand's IAD have been around a fairly long time as well.
Koxinga CDF
13:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I am aware of reports of plans to purchase the Buk and Tor, but there have been no independent confirmation that the systems are in service. If they are indeed in service, I would be incline to agree there is nothing in the region comparable. Koxinga CDF 12:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed the image showing Air Bases are not marching with the places. Homemalin Air base could has misplaced with Moulmein. Pathien and Hmawbi Air base are not mentioned. Please revise all Air Bases with correct names and situations marching the right image, and cite for more references. Found very few references....>>>> Kwantonge ( talk) 23:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Airforce-flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Myanmar g-4 super galeb.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Myanmar g-4 super galeb.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Myanmar Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Should we add the JF-17 fighter jet in, I am pretty sure a few were delivered to the Air Force before Pakistan suspended the order. Oscarm18 ( talk) 02:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
jf-17s are active in mayanmar airforce now please check and add — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.124.142.153 ( talk) 14:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Myanmar Shenyang J-6 is out of service. It should be removed from the list. Nafis Fuad Ayon ( talk) 13:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Is the Defence Services Historical Museum and Research Institute
a verifiable
published reference? Also please provide evidence relating to the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, specifically what variables need to be entered to verify the claims?
FDW777 (
talk)
07:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok.I will add the type in recipient, weapon type and a date range in the list. Thar thar lay(military observer) ( talk) 13:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
I already showed the date of recipient in the note from the early.The described names of radars are original name of the radar and I don't show any variant in the list because the received radars are the original model name and the variant name also didn't show in Stockholm International Peace Research Institute website.This is the all I can explain.Please removed the unverifiable claims tag from the article. Thar thar lay(military observer) ( talk) 13:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Defence Services Historical Museum and Research Institutea verifiable published reference? FDW777 ( talk) 14:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Myanmar Air Force's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "sipri1":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Navigator. 4,3,2,1,Master Signaler. 4,3,2,1,Master Air Gunner. 4,3,2,1,Master They are list over all NCO of MAF They are dress uniform with WO1 rank but it is not star,with what and attach half wing on chest. They are list between CO and NCO ,They are called Aviator 2001:44C8:4185:E68C:1:2:F78F:E166 ( talk) 06:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Removed Air Defense paragraph which was a repeat, probably due to cut and paste errors.
Removed the following statement from Air Defense: "With the introduction of new radar systems and Mobile Guided Surface to Air Missiles systems, MIADS become of the most advanced AD systems in the region. Many young officers have also done several Air Defence Training courses in Russia, Ukraine, China and Serbia."
Paragraph is not objective. Most advanced AD system in the region compared with which country? How about it's neighbor, India ?
Koxinga CDF 14:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Region defined, yet the key issue is the statement the most advanced in the region. It is too subjective, considering that the MIAD is fairly new, that Malaysia has been host to the Five Powers Defense Arrangement Integrated Air Defense System out of Butterworth, Penang since the 1970s and Thailand's IAD have been around a fairly long time as well.
Koxinga CDF
13:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I am aware of reports of plans to purchase the Buk and Tor, but there have been no independent confirmation that the systems are in service. If they are indeed in service, I would be incline to agree there is nothing in the region comparable. Koxinga CDF 12:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed the image showing Air Bases are not marching with the places. Homemalin Air base could has misplaced with Moulmein. Pathien and Hmawbi Air base are not mentioned. Please revise all Air Bases with correct names and situations marching the right image, and cite for more references. Found very few references....>>>> Kwantonge ( talk) 23:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Airforce-flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Myanmar g-4 super galeb.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Myanmar g-4 super galeb.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Myanmar Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Should we add the JF-17 fighter jet in, I am pretty sure a few were delivered to the Air Force before Pakistan suspended the order. Oscarm18 ( talk) 02:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
jf-17s are active in mayanmar airforce now please check and add — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.124.142.153 ( talk) 14:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Myanmar Shenyang J-6 is out of service. It should be removed from the list. Nafis Fuad Ayon ( talk) 13:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Is the Defence Services Historical Museum and Research Institute
a verifiable
published reference? Also please provide evidence relating to the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, specifically what variables need to be entered to verify the claims?
FDW777 (
talk)
07:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok.I will add the type in recipient, weapon type and a date range in the list. Thar thar lay(military observer) ( talk) 13:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
I already showed the date of recipient in the note from the early.The described names of radars are original name of the radar and I don't show any variant in the list because the received radars are the original model name and the variant name also didn't show in Stockholm International Peace Research Institute website.This is the all I can explain.Please removed the unverifiable claims tag from the article. Thar thar lay(military observer) ( talk) 13:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Defence Services Historical Museum and Research Institutea verifiable published reference? FDW777 ( talk) 14:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Myanmar Air Force's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "sipri1":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Navigator. 4,3,2,1,Master Signaler. 4,3,2,1,Master Air Gunner. 4,3,2,1,Master They are list over all NCO of MAF They are dress uniform with WO1 rank but it is not star,with what and attach half wing on chest. They are list between CO and NCO ,They are called Aviator 2001:44C8:4185:E68C:1:2:F78F:E166 ( talk) 06:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)