This page needs A LOT of work. I can stress A LOT enough.-- Krazycev 13 other crap 22:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
So... Why don't you try and help instead of just complaining about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.1.45 ( talk) 01:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I can see this page needs ALOT of work. I want to help make the page better. I have played the game (twice) and know a lot about it, but if I were to add anything, how would I site it? Could somebody please help... or let me know how I can?
This article is written like an advertisment in a magazine for the said game, not a Wikipedia article. 76.93.187.141 ( talk) 02:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It's clear the DS version has different story, etc., and it has enough reviews for a standalone article. I would suggest the portable version be split to its own article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 01:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support: While the independent notability of the Nintendo DS version feels rather flimsy from the scant amount of sources relating to it, I acknowledge that its differences from the Wii version are enough to justify a split. Cat's Tuxedo ( talk) 17:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: While the content of the games may be different, I don't think there is enough content to justify a split. OceanHok ( talk) 14:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: Regardless of the different storylines, the DS version hasn't received enough coverage to get its own page.
Sebbirrrr (
talk)
17:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- @
Sebbirrrr: That is entirely and unequivocally false. You may want to entirely reconsider your statement.
The NDS version got reviews from Games Master UK, Nintendo Gamer, and IGN, in addition to GamingXP and
JeuxVideo, more than enough to pass GNG and to provide enough content for a standalone article.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
13:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @ Zxcvbnm: Thank you for your reply. Fair enough, but my concern is that the development and release section concerns both versions rather than each separately. Also, you could have said that the game received enough reviews to justify a split instead of replying with hostility to what I said... Sebbirrrr ( talk) 14:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @
Sebbirrrr: That is entirely and unequivocally false. You may want to entirely reconsider your statement.
The NDS version got reviews from Games Master UK, Nintendo Gamer, and IGN, in addition to GamingXP and
JeuxVideo, more than enough to pass GNG and to provide enough content for a standalone article.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
13:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Neocorelight ( Talk) 23:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
This page needs A LOT of work. I can stress A LOT enough.-- Krazycev 13 other crap 22:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
So... Why don't you try and help instead of just complaining about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.1.45 ( talk) 01:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I can see this page needs ALOT of work. I want to help make the page better. I have played the game (twice) and know a lot about it, but if I were to add anything, how would I site it? Could somebody please help... or let me know how I can?
This article is written like an advertisment in a magazine for the said game, not a Wikipedia article. 76.93.187.141 ( talk) 02:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It's clear the DS version has different story, etc., and it has enough reviews for a standalone article. I would suggest the portable version be split to its own article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 01:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support: While the independent notability of the Nintendo DS version feels rather flimsy from the scant amount of sources relating to it, I acknowledge that its differences from the Wii version are enough to justify a split. Cat's Tuxedo ( talk) 17:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: While the content of the games may be different, I don't think there is enough content to justify a split. OceanHok ( talk) 14:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: Regardless of the different storylines, the DS version hasn't received enough coverage to get its own page.
Sebbirrrr (
talk)
17:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- @
Sebbirrrr: That is entirely and unequivocally false. You may want to entirely reconsider your statement.
The NDS version got reviews from Games Master UK, Nintendo Gamer, and IGN, in addition to GamingXP and
JeuxVideo, more than enough to pass GNG and to provide enough content for a standalone article.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
13:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @ Zxcvbnm: Thank you for your reply. Fair enough, but my concern is that the development and release section concerns both versions rather than each separately. Also, you could have said that the game received enough reviews to justify a split instead of replying with hostility to what I said... Sebbirrrr ( talk) 14:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @
Sebbirrrr: That is entirely and unequivocally false. You may want to entirely reconsider your statement.
The NDS version got reviews from Games Master UK, Nintendo Gamer, and IGN, in addition to GamingXP and
JeuxVideo, more than enough to pass GNG and to provide enough content for a standalone article.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
13:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Neocorelight ( Talk) 23:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)