This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: I can't make heads or tails of this as Ref #1 does not mention the subject, Ref #2 is a dead link, and Refs #3 and #4 call the film "Museum". So I'm leaning "oppose" based on the evidence presented. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
17:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
And one from
The Hollywood Reporter (for Museum). But what are the chances of an IP editor just popping up and knowing how to do a RM and cite a core policy? Unless, of course, it's a sock of a blocked user who has form in this area, such as Film Fan, for example. LugnutsFire Walk with Me18:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
You misunderstand the policy. You only redirect from native names when you're redirecting to an article that is relevant to that country/language. Redirecting Museo to Museum makes little sense here. The word "museo" is not relevant to the "museum" article. It isn't mentioned there. Even a hatnote linking to the "museum" article is not required. Anyone looking up "museo" won't be looking for anything besides this film.
213.205.242.131 (
talk)
01:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Support since English-language sources from this month (
Variety and
NBC News) write Museo. I searched for the director and actor together without the title, and these came up, so there was no inherent search bias for either Museo or Museum.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)21:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The existence of a dictionary definition does not mean that definition is the primary topic and anything else has to be disambiguated.
Inception is a word that does not warrant an encyclopedic article, so it is used for the one film called that. Someone looking up "Museo" on the English-language Wikipedia should not be considered to be looking for a Spanish-language article about museums. Though I think a hatnote saying that "museo" means "museum" at this film's article post-move would be fine.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)00:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: I can't make heads or tails of this as Ref #1 does not mention the subject, Ref #2 is a dead link, and Refs #3 and #4 call the film "Museum". So I'm leaning "oppose" based on the evidence presented. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
17:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
And one from
The Hollywood Reporter (for Museum). But what are the chances of an IP editor just popping up and knowing how to do a RM and cite a core policy? Unless, of course, it's a sock of a blocked user who has form in this area, such as Film Fan, for example. LugnutsFire Walk with Me18:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
You misunderstand the policy. You only redirect from native names when you're redirecting to an article that is relevant to that country/language. Redirecting Museo to Museum makes little sense here. The word "museo" is not relevant to the "museum" article. It isn't mentioned there. Even a hatnote linking to the "museum" article is not required. Anyone looking up "museo" won't be looking for anything besides this film.
213.205.242.131 (
talk)
01:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Support since English-language sources from this month (
Variety and
NBC News) write Museo. I searched for the director and actor together without the title, and these came up, so there was no inherent search bias for either Museo or Museum.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)21:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The existence of a dictionary definition does not mean that definition is the primary topic and anything else has to be disambiguated.
Inception is a word that does not warrant an encyclopedic article, so it is used for the one film called that. Someone looking up "Museo" on the English-language Wikipedia should not be considered to be looking for a Spanish-language article about museums. Though I think a hatnote saying that "museo" means "museum" at this film's article post-move would be fine.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)00:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.