This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 17 April 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Myocyte to Muscle cell. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Other ambiguities for myocyte aren't listed. Should this page be an actual article, not a disambiguation page? Temporaluser ( talk) 04:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
This page needs a lot of work! For a start it could talk about the specialised types of cell e.g. cardiac myocytes. There are a number of grammatical errors in the page and it generally lacks information. Grim Faerie ( talk) 14:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
The term "muscle cell" should redirect to myocyte but not skeletal muscle. The myocyte article should give a concise overview of the well-known types of muscle cells. Let the articles for the different muscle cell types provide the details. Chibibrain ( talk) 05:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
two things wrong about this article. 1. myoblasts don't fuse into myofibers. myoblasts don't even fuse. they differentiate into myocytes which fuse into myofibers. 2. myoblasts don't differentiate into satellite cells. satellite cells differentiate into myoblasts.
satellite cells > myoblasts > myocytes > muscle fibers Kuang and Rudnicki (2008) is a good source. they do suggest myoblasts may dedifferentiate back into satellite cells however. i dont have time to edit the page right now though. maybe someone else is up to the task? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnLattier ( talk • contribs) 18:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Myoblasts refer to all types of muscle cells. They are not simply skeletal muscle cells. Chibibrain ( talk) 04:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
A myoblast obviously isn't the same thing as a myocyte, but they are closely interrelated, and both articles are meagre stubs. Surely it makes more sense to merge them, and have all the info in one place? Anxietycello ( talk) 02:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Noticed this addition in a recent change to this page:
" Individual muscle fibrils are ejaculated on and surrounded by endomysium. "
The whole change included other additions that seemed constructive; is this vandalism, or is it constructive in this context? Kierkkadon ( talk) 14:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that the proposed title is not actually the same topic as the current one. Jenks24 ( talk) 08:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Myocyte →
Muscle fibre – I propose this move having seen the excellent move by Philg88. Such a move makes the name much more approachable for lay readers and, I believe, meets
WP:COMMONNAME.
Tom (LT) (
talk) 00:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted.
George Ho (
talk) 07:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
In the beginning of the section "Fiber typing" it is mentioned that a subtype IIb or IIB does not exist. This is currently state of the art and therefore correct. However, in the subsection "Type distribution" type 2b is mentioned rather often:
In my opinion these can be changed to IIX without a problem. Furthermore, I would like to change "Middle distance event athletes show approximately equal distribution of the 2 types." to "Middle distance event athletes show approximately equal distribution of the two types." Otherwise there might be confusions whether they have the same amount of type IIA and IIX fibres or type I and type II fibres.
Any objections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.206.108.162 ( talk) 08:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Myocyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
What is the size of muscle cells (skeletal and other)? From “average” to body-builder. I presume the length doesn’t change (with exercise). And compare that with other (human) cells.
NB: The membrane width isn’t cited either (just the lamina coat at 50 nm); the intro diagram shows the membrane being about 2% of width. So if the coat is 10% of membrane, cell is 25 μm wide. So (well) over a million in a bicep?
MBG02 ( talk) 01:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Muscle fibers, fast-twitch. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#Muscle fibers, fast-twitch until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 01:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Muscle fibre. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#Muscle fibre until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 01:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 07:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Myocyte → Muscle cell – Far more widely used - myocyte hardly registers on nGrams, and is outnumbered 5 to 1 against muscle cell on Google search. Muscle cell would avoid confusion of myocyte with muscle fiber. Iztwoz ( talk) 06:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Did human have muscular cells or not 156.200.222.77 ( talk) 22:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 17 April 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Myocyte to Muscle cell. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Other ambiguities for myocyte aren't listed. Should this page be an actual article, not a disambiguation page? Temporaluser ( talk) 04:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
This page needs a lot of work! For a start it could talk about the specialised types of cell e.g. cardiac myocytes. There are a number of grammatical errors in the page and it generally lacks information. Grim Faerie ( talk) 14:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
The term "muscle cell" should redirect to myocyte but not skeletal muscle. The myocyte article should give a concise overview of the well-known types of muscle cells. Let the articles for the different muscle cell types provide the details. Chibibrain ( talk) 05:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
two things wrong about this article. 1. myoblasts don't fuse into myofibers. myoblasts don't even fuse. they differentiate into myocytes which fuse into myofibers. 2. myoblasts don't differentiate into satellite cells. satellite cells differentiate into myoblasts.
satellite cells > myoblasts > myocytes > muscle fibers Kuang and Rudnicki (2008) is a good source. they do suggest myoblasts may dedifferentiate back into satellite cells however. i dont have time to edit the page right now though. maybe someone else is up to the task? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnLattier ( talk • contribs) 18:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Myoblasts refer to all types of muscle cells. They are not simply skeletal muscle cells. Chibibrain ( talk) 04:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
A myoblast obviously isn't the same thing as a myocyte, but they are closely interrelated, and both articles are meagre stubs. Surely it makes more sense to merge them, and have all the info in one place? Anxietycello ( talk) 02:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Noticed this addition in a recent change to this page:
" Individual muscle fibrils are ejaculated on and surrounded by endomysium. "
The whole change included other additions that seemed constructive; is this vandalism, or is it constructive in this context? Kierkkadon ( talk) 14:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that the proposed title is not actually the same topic as the current one. Jenks24 ( talk) 08:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Myocyte →
Muscle fibre – I propose this move having seen the excellent move by Philg88. Such a move makes the name much more approachable for lay readers and, I believe, meets
WP:COMMONNAME.
Tom (LT) (
talk) 00:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted.
George Ho (
talk) 07:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
In the beginning of the section "Fiber typing" it is mentioned that a subtype IIb or IIB does not exist. This is currently state of the art and therefore correct. However, in the subsection "Type distribution" type 2b is mentioned rather often:
In my opinion these can be changed to IIX without a problem. Furthermore, I would like to change "Middle distance event athletes show approximately equal distribution of the 2 types." to "Middle distance event athletes show approximately equal distribution of the two types." Otherwise there might be confusions whether they have the same amount of type IIA and IIX fibres or type I and type II fibres.
Any objections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.206.108.162 ( talk) 08:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Myocyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
What is the size of muscle cells (skeletal and other)? From “average” to body-builder. I presume the length doesn’t change (with exercise). And compare that with other (human) cells.
NB: The membrane width isn’t cited either (just the lamina coat at 50 nm); the intro diagram shows the membrane being about 2% of width. So if the coat is 10% of membrane, cell is 25 μm wide. So (well) over a million in a bicep?
MBG02 ( talk) 01:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Muscle fibers, fast-twitch. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#Muscle fibers, fast-twitch until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 01:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Muscle fibre. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#Muscle fibre until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 01:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 07:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Myocyte → Muscle cell – Far more widely used - myocyte hardly registers on nGrams, and is outnumbered 5 to 1 against muscle cell on Google search. Muscle cell would avoid confusion of myocyte with muscle fiber. Iztwoz ( talk) 06:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Did human have muscular cells or not 156.200.222.77 ( talk) 22:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)