This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have rated this article B class; I normally do not give out detailed feedback, but I'd like to do so here.
Lynch 7 17:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
An anonymous user has been repeatedly adding deliberate misinformation despite the fact I've reverted him/her twice. Please see this.
In order to prevent such incidents from occurring again, I am explaining here in detail why the edit has been reverted.
This phrase is a violation of WP:OR and WP:PEACOCK. Besides, this sentence doesn't make any sense to a reader like me; the only purpose it serves is to fill a few bytes of space.
No need to mention this as no older Hindu temple have been found underwater. One possibly older structure is a temple excavated at Puhar but it is still to be determined whether the temple is Hindu or Buddhist.
Redundant. Unnecessary to state such a thing in the first paragraph of the lead while the "rock inscriptions incident" is mentioned in the second pareagraph of the lead.
The editor does not mention what sources refer to the sanctum sanctorum as vimana. The word Vimana is mostly used to refer to the temple tower and no where to the sanctum sanctorum, atleast, in none of the refs I've provided it is used in such a context.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 10:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MathewTownsend ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'll review this article soon.
Note: The link checker has found two dead links that need to be replaced.
Regards, MathewTownsend ( talk) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
I've done some preliminary copy editing [1] - feel free to revert if you don't like.
There are now three dead links to citations that need to be replaced.
Also Nandi and Frontline ( Front line (disambiguation)) need disambiguation.
Once these are fixed I'll complete the review. Meanwhile I'll put the article on hold. MathewTownsend ( talk) 16:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
\\Apart from these, there are five other pillars with inscriptions by the Pallava kings Dantivarman I, Nandivarman III and Kambavarman, the Rashtrakuta king Krishna III and the Chola king Rajendra Chola III.[9]//
This site has to be named as Murugan Temple instead of Subrahmanya Temple. The name of the God is Murugan in Tamil. Subrahmanya is the Sanskrit name for this God. I request you to accept my changes in the text and also change to the title to "Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Padmaxi ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have rated this article B class; I normally do not give out detailed feedback, but I'd like to do so here.
Lynch 7 17:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
An anonymous user has been repeatedly adding deliberate misinformation despite the fact I've reverted him/her twice. Please see this.
In order to prevent such incidents from occurring again, I am explaining here in detail why the edit has been reverted.
This phrase is a violation of WP:OR and WP:PEACOCK. Besides, this sentence doesn't make any sense to a reader like me; the only purpose it serves is to fill a few bytes of space.
No need to mention this as no older Hindu temple have been found underwater. One possibly older structure is a temple excavated at Puhar but it is still to be determined whether the temple is Hindu or Buddhist.
Redundant. Unnecessary to state such a thing in the first paragraph of the lead while the "rock inscriptions incident" is mentioned in the second pareagraph of the lead.
The editor does not mention what sources refer to the sanctum sanctorum as vimana. The word Vimana is mostly used to refer to the temple tower and no where to the sanctum sanctorum, atleast, in none of the refs I've provided it is used in such a context.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 10:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MathewTownsend ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'll review this article soon.
Note: The link checker has found two dead links that need to be replaced.
Regards, MathewTownsend ( talk) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
I've done some preliminary copy editing [1] - feel free to revert if you don't like.
There are now three dead links to citations that need to be replaced.
Also Nandi and Frontline ( Front line (disambiguation)) need disambiguation.
Once these are fixed I'll complete the review. Meanwhile I'll put the article on hold. MathewTownsend ( talk) 16:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
\\Apart from these, there are five other pillars with inscriptions by the Pallava kings Dantivarman I, Nandivarman III and Kambavarman, the Rashtrakuta king Krishna III and the Chola king Rajendra Chola III.[9]//
This site has to be named as Murugan Temple instead of Subrahmanya Temple. The name of the God is Murugan in Tamil. Subrahmanya is the Sanskrit name for this God. I request you to accept my changes in the text and also change to the title to "Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Padmaxi ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)