| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'll review this article soon.
Note: The link checker has found two dead links that need to be replaced.
Regards, MathewTownsend ( talk) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- review
I've done some preliminary copy editing [1] - feel free to revert if you don't like.
There are now three dead links to citations that need to be replaced.
Also Nandi and Frontline ( Front line (disambiguation)) need disambiguation.
Once these are fixed I'll complete the review. Meanwhile I'll put the article on hold. MathewTownsend ( talk) 16:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have made a few additional edits which you are free to correct and fixed the disambig problems. [2]
- I'm unclear why the last citation has two different isbn numbers, but they both seem relevant. In any case the is an excellent article, perhaps too many citations, but I understand why an editor wants to be careful.
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose:
clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with
MoS for
lead,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. Prose:
clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- B. Provides
in-line citations from
reliable sources where necessary:
- C.
No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Remains focused:
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No
edit wars, etc:
- No
edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass! A wonderful article, well written and interesting.
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations! MathewTownsend ( talk) 21:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot :)- Ravi My Tea Kadai 01:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'll review this article soon.
Note: The link checker has found two dead links that need to be replaced.
Regards, MathewTownsend ( talk) 12:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- review
I've done some preliminary copy editing [1] - feel free to revert if you don't like.
There are now three dead links to citations that need to be replaced.
Also Nandi and Frontline ( Front line (disambiguation)) need disambiguation.
Once these are fixed I'll complete the review. Meanwhile I'll put the article on hold. MathewTownsend ( talk) 16:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have made a few additional edits which you are free to correct and fixed the disambig problems. [2]
- I'm unclear why the last citation has two different isbn numbers, but they both seem relevant. In any case the is an excellent article, perhaps too many citations, but I understand why an editor wants to be careful.
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose:
clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with
MoS for
lead,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. Prose:
clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- B. Provides
in-line citations from
reliable sources where necessary:
- C.
No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Remains focused:
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No
edit wars, etc:
- No
edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass! A wonderful article, well written and interesting.
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations! MathewTownsend ( talk) 21:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot :)- Ravi My Tea Kadai 01:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)