Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 25, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Reyk ( talk · contribs) 21:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one. I will aim to finish the review within a few days. Reyk YO! 21:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a fairly high-quality and well-written article. There's no problems with neutrality or stability. It certainly has the potential to be a GA, without too much extra work. There are a few instances of inadequate sourcing, where the source does not support the claim being made. I'll work through the article section by section, as I have time, and make specific suggestions.
This section is fine as it is.
Also OK.
@ Reyk: Can you spot check my fixes so far? I also removed a lot of additional synthesis that I couldn't source. Still working on the issue with the lede. Thoughts on my converting those redundant references into a "Selected publications" section? Not very sure about that. I hope you don't mind but I edited your lists to number them so we can refer to them more easily. Getting there! § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
@ FreeRangeFrog: Passed. Congratulations, and thanks for your hard work on this. Reyk YO! 17:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz. I managed to add archive links to 1 source, out of the total 1 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.
Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{
cbignore}}
to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.
Below, I have included a list of modifications I've made:
Cheers.—
cyberbot II
Talk to my owner:Online 15:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 25, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Reyk ( talk · contribs) 21:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one. I will aim to finish the review within a few days. Reyk YO! 21:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a fairly high-quality and well-written article. There's no problems with neutrality or stability. It certainly has the potential to be a GA, without too much extra work. There are a few instances of inadequate sourcing, where the source does not support the claim being made. I'll work through the article section by section, as I have time, and make specific suggestions.
This section is fine as it is.
Also OK.
@ Reyk: Can you spot check my fixes so far? I also removed a lot of additional synthesis that I couldn't source. Still working on the issue with the lede. Thoughts on my converting those redundant references into a "Selected publications" section? Not very sure about that. I hope you don't mind but I edited your lists to number them so we can refer to them more easily. Getting there! § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
@ FreeRangeFrog: Passed. Congratulations, and thanks for your hard work on this. Reyk YO! 17:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz. I managed to add archive links to 1 source, out of the total 1 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.
Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{
cbignore}}
to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.
Below, I have included a list of modifications I've made:
Cheers.—
cyberbot II
Talk to my owner:Online 15:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)