From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The explanation of the Christian-Muslim relation/argument at the Incident of Mubahala is very confusing here, I cannot understand what is written. Boleslaw ( talk) 12:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)DB reply

Improving The article

@ Faizhaider:Hello.I am going to improve this article so that it won't have the problems labeled at the top of the article. I would provided it with some sources and so I will have to delete some parts for which there is not valid source. I hope it is OK with you. I would be happy to use your advice too. Hadi.anani ( talk) 13:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Hadi.anani: the article is poorly referenced. You can help by fixing the current references and by finding new ones. Mhhossein ( talk) 13:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Mhhossein and Faizhaider: The paper had no valid reference and to provide it with valid references I had to replace most parts of the paper with new information for which there was valid references. Hadi.anani ( talk) 13:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

  • I have been working on this article so that it does not have the problems labeled at the top of it any longer, so I am going to remove the label. Hadi.anani ( talk) 13:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The explanation of the Christian-Muslim relation/argument at the Incident of Mubahala is very confusing here, I cannot understand what is written. Boleslaw ( talk) 12:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)DB reply

Improving The article

@ Faizhaider:Hello.I am going to improve this article so that it won't have the problems labeled at the top of the article. I would provided it with some sources and so I will have to delete some parts for which there is not valid source. I hope it is OK with you. I would be happy to use your advice too. Hadi.anani ( talk) 13:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Hadi.anani: the article is poorly referenced. You can help by fixing the current references and by finding new ones. Mhhossein ( talk) 13:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Mhhossein and Faizhaider: The paper had no valid reference and to provide it with valid references I had to replace most parts of the paper with new information for which there was valid references. Hadi.anani ( talk) 13:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

  • I have been working on this article so that it does not have the problems labeled at the top of it any longer, so I am going to remove the label. Hadi.anani ( talk) 13:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook