This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mount St. Peter Church article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Mount St. Peter Church has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2010. Further details are available here. |
This is a good start. You can add more wikilinks, and also go to pages that you link to, and link back (so that people will be able to find your article). Be sure your links are to the proper people/things. Stephen M. Young is linked to the wrong Stephen M. Young. Also, use the full name of the Bishops and be sure to link to them. They are listed (most of them). Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Good work on this article. I have just a couple of comments:
Anyway, that is it from me. Good work so far. Cheers. — AustralianRupert ( talk) 16:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a very informative article. The sentence structure and variation makes it an easy read. However, there are some typos. Under "Find a new Location," the first sentence contains the word "was" (the third word) which I do not think belongs there. Also, in some parts, the use of commas could be used instead of parentheses.
Maybe some pictures could be added to show the areas of the church that were described or of the church itself.
It is a really good article; I enjoyed reading it! Clarker1 ( talk) 20:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
This article is well written and very informative. My grandparents actually go to this church, and I myself have been there every Christmas for as long as I can remember. I appreciated how in depth you went with this article. There are a few small typos in the article. Also, in the alter server section, the book used in mass is not the bible, it is the Roman Missal. This is the book used for the procedures in the mass. I linked it to the article so you can check it out. Great article though! Benro129 ( talk) 17:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
I would agree with typos and the reference issue, however I would still say it is a very good article. As with the "neutral writing" issue, war heroes is a common phrase for those in the war, not necessarily her opinion. Clarker1 ( talk) 16:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I think your article is very well written. It is a good length, not too wordy but still detailed enough. Your pictures are very good and add a good touch to the article. I went through and looked at the other comments. I think the edits that you have made seem to have improved your article. I made a few grammar updates, other than that it looks great. Well done! hersh016 ( talk)
I suggest you go back through this with a really touch eye for the details. I agree with the GA reviewer about the paucity of sources. I was pleased to see you find a couple more sources, but I think a history of the county, and even a history of the diocese would help. There is probably a bio of Regis Canevin as well, which could provide general information about the problems faced in Catholic parishes. Auntieruth55 ( talk) 18:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
St. Josaphat's Roman Catholic Church | |
---|---|
![]() Front facade, 2008 | |
Religion | |
Affiliation | Roman Catholic |
Leadership | Fr. Mark Borkowski |
Year consecrated | 1901 |
Location | |
Location |
Detroit,
Michigan, ![]() |
Geographic coordinates | 42°21′21″N 83°3′10″W / 42.35583°N 83.05278°W |
Architecture | |
Architect(s) | Joseph G. Kastler, William E. N. Hunter |
Type | church |
Style | Romanesque Revival |
Completed | 1901 |
Specifications | |
Capacity | 1,200 |
Length | 132 feet (40 m) |
Width | 56 feet (17 m) |
Height (max) | 200 feet (61 m) |
Materials | brick, limestone |
U.S. National Register of Historic Places | |
Added to NRHP | December 8, 1982 |
NRHP Reference no. | 82000555 [1] |
Website | |
http://www.stjosaphatchurch.org |
References
This is a very detailed article and it shows how much time you put into it! You wrapped everything together and made this an interesting read. Good job! Nock526 ( talk) 03:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mount St. Peter Church article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Mount St. Peter Church has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2010. Further details are available here. |
This is a good start. You can add more wikilinks, and also go to pages that you link to, and link back (so that people will be able to find your article). Be sure your links are to the proper people/things. Stephen M. Young is linked to the wrong Stephen M. Young. Also, use the full name of the Bishops and be sure to link to them. They are listed (most of them). Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Good work on this article. I have just a couple of comments:
Anyway, that is it from me. Good work so far. Cheers. — AustralianRupert ( talk) 16:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a very informative article. The sentence structure and variation makes it an easy read. However, there are some typos. Under "Find a new Location," the first sentence contains the word "was" (the third word) which I do not think belongs there. Also, in some parts, the use of commas could be used instead of parentheses.
Maybe some pictures could be added to show the areas of the church that were described or of the church itself.
It is a really good article; I enjoyed reading it! Clarker1 ( talk) 20:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
This article is well written and very informative. My grandparents actually go to this church, and I myself have been there every Christmas for as long as I can remember. I appreciated how in depth you went with this article. There are a few small typos in the article. Also, in the alter server section, the book used in mass is not the bible, it is the Roman Missal. This is the book used for the procedures in the mass. I linked it to the article so you can check it out. Great article though! Benro129 ( talk) 17:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
I would agree with typos and the reference issue, however I would still say it is a very good article. As with the "neutral writing" issue, war heroes is a common phrase for those in the war, not necessarily her opinion. Clarker1 ( talk) 16:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I think your article is very well written. It is a good length, not too wordy but still detailed enough. Your pictures are very good and add a good touch to the article. I went through and looked at the other comments. I think the edits that you have made seem to have improved your article. I made a few grammar updates, other than that it looks great. Well done! hersh016 ( talk)
I suggest you go back through this with a really touch eye for the details. I agree with the GA reviewer about the paucity of sources. I was pleased to see you find a couple more sources, but I think a history of the county, and even a history of the diocese would help. There is probably a bio of Regis Canevin as well, which could provide general information about the problems faced in Catholic parishes. Auntieruth55 ( talk) 18:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
St. Josaphat's Roman Catholic Church | |
---|---|
![]() Front facade, 2008 | |
Religion | |
Affiliation | Roman Catholic |
Leadership | Fr. Mark Borkowski |
Year consecrated | 1901 |
Location | |
Location |
Detroit,
Michigan, ![]() |
Geographic coordinates | 42°21′21″N 83°3′10″W / 42.35583°N 83.05278°W |
Architecture | |
Architect(s) | Joseph G. Kastler, William E. N. Hunter |
Type | church |
Style | Romanesque Revival |
Completed | 1901 |
Specifications | |
Capacity | 1,200 |
Length | 132 feet (40 m) |
Width | 56 feet (17 m) |
Height (max) | 200 feet (61 m) |
Materials | brick, limestone |
U.S. National Register of Historic Places | |
Added to NRHP | December 8, 1982 |
NRHP Reference no. | 82000555 [1] |
Website | |
http://www.stjosaphatchurch.org |
References
This is a very detailed article and it shows how much time you put into it! You wrapped everything together and made this an interesting read. Good job! Nock526 ( talk) 03:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)