This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Mount Pinatubo is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 25, 2005. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think these two ought to be mentioned somewhere in this article. The Wikipedia page on the Krafft's states that their footage helped convince authorities that eruption was imminent and evacuation necessary. Certainly they saved many lives and the same year sacrificed their own in that line of work. Would surely be disrespectful not to mention this somewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.187.112 ( talk) 14:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
text says "after 500 years of dormancy", however i feel this should be "after 460 years of dormancy"
The referenced Mount Pinatubo eruption was not the largest of the 20th century. Some references have it as the second largest or the third largest. Please see the discussion at Talk:Novarupta. -- Burntnickel 21:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
In the infobox last eruption date field there is a link to the Smithsonian Global Volcanism site that is appearing as a reference (a number is brackets). This is confusing as this is not the same as the same numbered reference in the main body text and it does not appear in the list of references. I'm not sure what the prefered solution to this problem is. Should the link be removed, made and independant reference or what? -- Burntnickel 12:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
In the last paragraph of the "1991 Awakening" section, it clearly states: "The first magmatic eruptions occurred on June 3". However, this is contradicted two sections later in the first paragraph of the "Eruptions Build to a Climax" section, where it states: "On June 7th, the first magmatic eruptions took place". I would correct this information myself, if I knew which one was true. Anyone have any ideas? Curlyiain 15:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
The large amount of quoted PD material isn't appropriate to be simply stuck on the end of the article. I moved it to Talk:Mount Pinatubo/new material until we can integrate it back into the article. hike395 05:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I have added a valuable information on the volcano's trekking history after its eruption in 1994. This information was from the wiki page of Dale Abenojar-- Afrescom ( talk) 06:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The article says that Mount Pinatubo is an active stratovolcano. What is it doing now? Is it just smoking? -- The High Fin Sperm Whale ( talk) 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
"Although the 1991 eruption was one of the largest and most violent of the 20th century, it was weaker than any of the historical eruptions uncovered by geologists. There is some evidence that eruptions at Pinatubo are getting weaker over time, but this is by no means conclusively established." The c. 1450 eruption was even weaker, with VEI of 5! See Global Volcanism Programme. Guanlongwucaii ( talk) 08:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)GuanlongwucaiiHi!!
According to the article, "in the year following the Pinatubo eruption, the moon was hardly visible at all during eclipses, due to much greater absorption of sunlight by dust in the atmosphere," however in a previous section it is mentioned that sunlight was attenuated by only 10 percent. Such a decrease can readily be identified by instrumentation, but is hard to notice otherwise. If the moon was indeed hardly visible, this is more likely due to aerosol scattering, not absorption. I also think this bit requires a source. Odedee ( talk) 21:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
According to the "Activity since 1991" section, "Since 1991, Pinatubo has remained active, with twenty activity events reported in 1992, three in 1993, four in 1994, two in 1995, and one each in 1996 and 2002." But, under "The area since 1991", "Since 1992, the volcano has been dormant." Maybe it's fine, I have no clue -- I only bring it up because those two statements together confused me while reading this article. 31stCenturyMatt ( talk) 04:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Some of the information in this article came from the sources listed below. If anyone requests more citations...:
Cynthia Banzon Bautista, The Mount Pinatubo Disaster and the People of Central Luzon
J.W. Ewert, Andrew B. Lockhart, Sergio Marcial, and Gemme Ambubuyog, Ground Deformation Prior to the 1991 Eruptions of Mount Pinatubo
David H. Harlow, John A. Power, Eduardo P. Laguerta, Gemme Ambubuyog, Randall A. White, and Richard P. Hoblitt, Precursory Seismicity and Forecasting of the June 15, 1991, Eruption of Mount Pinatubo
Richard P. Hoblitt, Edward W. Wolfe, William E. Scott, Marvin R. Couchman, John S. Pallister, and Dindo Javier, The Preclimactic Eruptions of Mount Pinatubo, June 1991
Remigio A. Mercado, Jay Bertram T. Lacsamana, and Greg L. Pineda, Socioeconomic Impacts of the Mount Pinatubo Eruption
Christopher G. Newhall, Arturo S. Daag, F.G. Delfin, Jr., Richard P. Hoblitt, John McGeehin, John S. Pallister, Ma. Theresa M. Regalado, Meyer Rubin, Bella S. Tubianosa, Rodolfo A. Tamayo, Jr., and Jesse V. Umbal, http://pubs.usgs.gov/pinatubo/newhall/index.html Eruptive History of Mount Pinatubo]
Ma. Lynn O. Paladio-Melosantos, Renato U. Solidum, William E. Scott, Rowena B. Quiambao, Jesse V. Umbal, Kelvin S. Rodolfo, Bella S. Tubianosa, Perla J. Delos Reyes, Rosalito A. Alonso, and Hernulfo B. Ruelo, Tephra Falls of the 1991 Eruptions of Mount Pinatubo
William E. Scott, Richard P. Hoblitt, Ronnie C. Torres, Stephen Self, Ma. Mylene L. Martinez, and Timoteo Nillos, Jr., Pyroclastic Flows of the June 15, 1991, Climactic Eruption of Mount Pinatubo
Stephen Self, Jing-Xia Zhao, Rick E. Holasek, Ronnie C. Torres, and Alan J. King, The Atmospheric Impact of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo Eruption
Robin J.S. Spence, Antonios Pomonis, Peter J. Baxter, Andrew W. Coburn, Mark White, Manuel Dayrit, and Field Epidemiology Training Program Team, Building Damage Caused by the Mount Pinatubo Eruption of June 15, 1991
Jean Tayag, Sheila Insauriga, Anne Ringor, and Mel Belo, People's Response to Eruption Warning: The Pinatubo Experience, 1991-92
Edward W. Wolfe and Richard P. Hoblitt, Overview of the Eruptions
Would it be better to have a page about the volcano and a seperate page about the 1991 eruption event? TimKasoar ( talk) 19:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Maybe the article has grown since this discussion? I think the 1991 eruption should be moved to its own page, or at least let's revisit the issue Ninjalectual ( talk) 09:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This article is so good! Why is it no longer a featured article? Has anyone vandalised this page?-- Small Boss ( talk) 09:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
"This led to a decrease in northern hemisphere average temperatures of 0.5–0.6 °C (0.9–1.1 °F), and a global fall of about 0.4 °C (0.7 °F)."
I think it needs to be made clearer what measure of global temperature is being used here. A fall of this magnitude is not visible in either the CRU or GISS global temperature datasets:
CRU temperatures: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/temp/jonescru/graphics/glnhsh.png - figure from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/temp/jonescru/jones.html
GISS temperatures: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Pagw ( talk) 20:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
These group of mountains which is part of the Zambales Mountain Range is verified by my references as just Cabusilan Mountains not Tri-Cabusilan Mountains. I am following the rules of verifiability per WP:Verifiability and WP:Verifiability, not truth. I could present ten more references to support just Cabusilan. Here, try using Google Books search for Cabusilan. Try searching for 'Tri-Cabusilan' and it will only give you books sourced from Wikipedia! Please stop spreading misinformation by using Wikipedia. Please read why verifiability is important. If Cabusilan is again changed to Tri-Cabusilan, then that would be considered as vandalism and reverted right away. Thanks. - Briarfallen ( talk) 10:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
In the intro it says "destroying thousands of infrastructures".
Infrastructure is a collective noun so it is already plural and does not need to have an 's' on the end. Philip Sutton ( talk) 03:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
What was CO2 emission during explosion and eruption ?
What was total gas emission in atmosphere SO2 NO H2O CO2 etc ?
Please add this data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.92.193.141 ( talk) 14:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Good video at - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNpdwd53qgM Merlin-UK ( talk) 10:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Regarding Aeta people some things seem to be wrong:
The majority of the today Filipinos, unlike Mexicans or Argentinians, are not of spanish descent, they are Malayo-Polynesians. This seems to be an underlying misunderstanding in this article. -- Käptn Weltall ( talk) 17:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus is that the title as it is currently is correct. ( closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane talk 20:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Mount Pinatubo →
Pinatubo – Same with
Talk:Mayon#Requested move 23 December 2016.
WP:Concise and
WP:Commonname: The modifier/title is not needed since there is only one
WP:Primary topic for the word "Pinatubo" and it is this article. The volcano is known by its proper name without the word "Mountain" or "Volcano". Based
MOS:PHIL Places, the modifier is optional for well-known places.
Shhhhwwww!! (
talk)
20:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://web.mechse.illinois.edu/research/gioia/Art/nature07866.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Better than the gif image used in the eruption section. B137 ( talk) 15:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Because there are many suggestions about article Mount Taal and these eruptions to merged. This time I want to request to split that eruption section into separate article namely 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.137.168.126 ( talk) 09:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
At the end of the lede, what does "ozone depletion temporarily saw a substantial increase" mean? That ozone depletion increased ? Or that the level of ozone increased? The cited source doesn't even mention ozone. Bermicourt ( talk) 14:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
What the history of mt Pinatubo 136.158.117.80 ( talk) 06:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Mount Pinatubo is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 25, 2005. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think these two ought to be mentioned somewhere in this article. The Wikipedia page on the Krafft's states that their footage helped convince authorities that eruption was imminent and evacuation necessary. Certainly they saved many lives and the same year sacrificed their own in that line of work. Would surely be disrespectful not to mention this somewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.187.112 ( talk) 14:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
text says "after 500 years of dormancy", however i feel this should be "after 460 years of dormancy"
The referenced Mount Pinatubo eruption was not the largest of the 20th century. Some references have it as the second largest or the third largest. Please see the discussion at Talk:Novarupta. -- Burntnickel 21:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
In the infobox last eruption date field there is a link to the Smithsonian Global Volcanism site that is appearing as a reference (a number is brackets). This is confusing as this is not the same as the same numbered reference in the main body text and it does not appear in the list of references. I'm not sure what the prefered solution to this problem is. Should the link be removed, made and independant reference or what? -- Burntnickel 12:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
In the last paragraph of the "1991 Awakening" section, it clearly states: "The first magmatic eruptions occurred on June 3". However, this is contradicted two sections later in the first paragraph of the "Eruptions Build to a Climax" section, where it states: "On June 7th, the first magmatic eruptions took place". I would correct this information myself, if I knew which one was true. Anyone have any ideas? Curlyiain 15:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
The large amount of quoted PD material isn't appropriate to be simply stuck on the end of the article. I moved it to Talk:Mount Pinatubo/new material until we can integrate it back into the article. hike395 05:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I have added a valuable information on the volcano's trekking history after its eruption in 1994. This information was from the wiki page of Dale Abenojar-- Afrescom ( talk) 06:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The article says that Mount Pinatubo is an active stratovolcano. What is it doing now? Is it just smoking? -- The High Fin Sperm Whale ( talk) 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
"Although the 1991 eruption was one of the largest and most violent of the 20th century, it was weaker than any of the historical eruptions uncovered by geologists. There is some evidence that eruptions at Pinatubo are getting weaker over time, but this is by no means conclusively established." The c. 1450 eruption was even weaker, with VEI of 5! See Global Volcanism Programme. Guanlongwucaii ( talk) 08:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)GuanlongwucaiiHi!!
According to the article, "in the year following the Pinatubo eruption, the moon was hardly visible at all during eclipses, due to much greater absorption of sunlight by dust in the atmosphere," however in a previous section it is mentioned that sunlight was attenuated by only 10 percent. Such a decrease can readily be identified by instrumentation, but is hard to notice otherwise. If the moon was indeed hardly visible, this is more likely due to aerosol scattering, not absorption. I also think this bit requires a source. Odedee ( talk) 21:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
According to the "Activity since 1991" section, "Since 1991, Pinatubo has remained active, with twenty activity events reported in 1992, three in 1993, four in 1994, two in 1995, and one each in 1996 and 2002." But, under "The area since 1991", "Since 1992, the volcano has been dormant." Maybe it's fine, I have no clue -- I only bring it up because those two statements together confused me while reading this article. 31stCenturyMatt ( talk) 04:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Some of the information in this article came from the sources listed below. If anyone requests more citations...:
Cynthia Banzon Bautista, The Mount Pinatubo Disaster and the People of Central Luzon
J.W. Ewert, Andrew B. Lockhart, Sergio Marcial, and Gemme Ambubuyog, Ground Deformation Prior to the 1991 Eruptions of Mount Pinatubo
David H. Harlow, John A. Power, Eduardo P. Laguerta, Gemme Ambubuyog, Randall A. White, and Richard P. Hoblitt, Precursory Seismicity and Forecasting of the June 15, 1991, Eruption of Mount Pinatubo
Richard P. Hoblitt, Edward W. Wolfe, William E. Scott, Marvin R. Couchman, John S. Pallister, and Dindo Javier, The Preclimactic Eruptions of Mount Pinatubo, June 1991
Remigio A. Mercado, Jay Bertram T. Lacsamana, and Greg L. Pineda, Socioeconomic Impacts of the Mount Pinatubo Eruption
Christopher G. Newhall, Arturo S. Daag, F.G. Delfin, Jr., Richard P. Hoblitt, John McGeehin, John S. Pallister, Ma. Theresa M. Regalado, Meyer Rubin, Bella S. Tubianosa, Rodolfo A. Tamayo, Jr., and Jesse V. Umbal, http://pubs.usgs.gov/pinatubo/newhall/index.html Eruptive History of Mount Pinatubo]
Ma. Lynn O. Paladio-Melosantos, Renato U. Solidum, William E. Scott, Rowena B. Quiambao, Jesse V. Umbal, Kelvin S. Rodolfo, Bella S. Tubianosa, Perla J. Delos Reyes, Rosalito A. Alonso, and Hernulfo B. Ruelo, Tephra Falls of the 1991 Eruptions of Mount Pinatubo
William E. Scott, Richard P. Hoblitt, Ronnie C. Torres, Stephen Self, Ma. Mylene L. Martinez, and Timoteo Nillos, Jr., Pyroclastic Flows of the June 15, 1991, Climactic Eruption of Mount Pinatubo
Stephen Self, Jing-Xia Zhao, Rick E. Holasek, Ronnie C. Torres, and Alan J. King, The Atmospheric Impact of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo Eruption
Robin J.S. Spence, Antonios Pomonis, Peter J. Baxter, Andrew W. Coburn, Mark White, Manuel Dayrit, and Field Epidemiology Training Program Team, Building Damage Caused by the Mount Pinatubo Eruption of June 15, 1991
Jean Tayag, Sheila Insauriga, Anne Ringor, and Mel Belo, People's Response to Eruption Warning: The Pinatubo Experience, 1991-92
Edward W. Wolfe and Richard P. Hoblitt, Overview of the Eruptions
Would it be better to have a page about the volcano and a seperate page about the 1991 eruption event? TimKasoar ( talk) 19:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Maybe the article has grown since this discussion? I think the 1991 eruption should be moved to its own page, or at least let's revisit the issue Ninjalectual ( talk) 09:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This article is so good! Why is it no longer a featured article? Has anyone vandalised this page?-- Small Boss ( talk) 09:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
"This led to a decrease in northern hemisphere average temperatures of 0.5–0.6 °C (0.9–1.1 °F), and a global fall of about 0.4 °C (0.7 °F)."
I think it needs to be made clearer what measure of global temperature is being used here. A fall of this magnitude is not visible in either the CRU or GISS global temperature datasets:
CRU temperatures: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/temp/jonescru/graphics/glnhsh.png - figure from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/temp/jonescru/jones.html
GISS temperatures: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Pagw ( talk) 20:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
These group of mountains which is part of the Zambales Mountain Range is verified by my references as just Cabusilan Mountains not Tri-Cabusilan Mountains. I am following the rules of verifiability per WP:Verifiability and WP:Verifiability, not truth. I could present ten more references to support just Cabusilan. Here, try using Google Books search for Cabusilan. Try searching for 'Tri-Cabusilan' and it will only give you books sourced from Wikipedia! Please stop spreading misinformation by using Wikipedia. Please read why verifiability is important. If Cabusilan is again changed to Tri-Cabusilan, then that would be considered as vandalism and reverted right away. Thanks. - Briarfallen ( talk) 10:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
In the intro it says "destroying thousands of infrastructures".
Infrastructure is a collective noun so it is already plural and does not need to have an 's' on the end. Philip Sutton ( talk) 03:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
What was CO2 emission during explosion and eruption ?
What was total gas emission in atmosphere SO2 NO H2O CO2 etc ?
Please add this data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.92.193.141 ( talk) 14:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Good video at - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNpdwd53qgM Merlin-UK ( talk) 10:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Regarding Aeta people some things seem to be wrong:
The majority of the today Filipinos, unlike Mexicans or Argentinians, are not of spanish descent, they are Malayo-Polynesians. This seems to be an underlying misunderstanding in this article. -- Käptn Weltall ( talk) 17:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus is that the title as it is currently is correct. ( closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane talk 20:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Mount Pinatubo →
Pinatubo – Same with
Talk:Mayon#Requested move 23 December 2016.
WP:Concise and
WP:Commonname: The modifier/title is not needed since there is only one
WP:Primary topic for the word "Pinatubo" and it is this article. The volcano is known by its proper name without the word "Mountain" or "Volcano". Based
MOS:PHIL Places, the modifier is optional for well-known places.
Shhhhwwww!! (
talk)
20:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://web.mechse.illinois.edu/research/gioia/Art/nature07866.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pinatubo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Better than the gif image used in the eruption section. B137 ( talk) 15:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Because there are many suggestions about article Mount Taal and these eruptions to merged. This time I want to request to split that eruption section into separate article namely 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.137.168.126 ( talk) 09:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
At the end of the lede, what does "ozone depletion temporarily saw a substantial increase" mean? That ozone depletion increased ? Or that the level of ozone increased? The cited source doesn't even mention ozone. Bermicourt ( talk) 14:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
What the history of mt Pinatubo 136.158.117.80 ( talk) 06:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)