![]() | Mount & Blade has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 1, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mount & Blade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Mount & Blade" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 30 days
![]() |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mount & Blade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://forums.taleworlds.net/index.php/topic,39194.0.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk · contribs) 07:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I tend to avoid using the GAlist template if I see some apparent flaws that are easy to see.
Further, weapons have certain ranges where they are minimally and maximally effective, which gives the different weapon types different playing styles. A spear, for instance, will do minimal damage when used on an enemy very close to the player, where a hammer could cause maximum damage.
*There is barely anything substantial to have a plot section. It just continues to highlight that there is no overarching plot and the player holds. There is mention of a "Constants" but doesn't make it clear in this game. For these types of games, it could be beneficial to just have a "Premise". If there is not enough information to even provide a premise section, then it might be beneficial to just merge the information into gameplay.
Mount & Blade received "mixed or average" reviews according to the review aggregation website Metacritic.
Critics like Eurogamer, GameSpot, IGN and TechAdvisor praised it, describing it as one of the best implementations of medieval combat ever created.
Mount & Blade has received negative criticism for its repetitive quests, dialogues, and locations, as well as poor graphics quality.
This section is out of date. There's no need to mention a Sequel has been announced if they were already released. It should be rewritten to notate their release date, and also significant changes/new features from its predecessor, and if it is relevant, also include chronology. Anything that hasn't been released yet can retain the announcement information.
If you could address these issue, I will look further into it. Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 23:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
The map is wrong. 85.229.187.64 ( talk) 21:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Mount & Blade has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 1, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mount & Blade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Mount & Blade" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 30 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mount & Blade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://forums.taleworlds.net/index.php/topic,39194.0.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk · contribs) 07:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I tend to avoid using the GAlist template if I see some apparent flaws that are easy to see.
Further, weapons have certain ranges where they are minimally and maximally effective, which gives the different weapon types different playing styles. A spear, for instance, will do minimal damage when used on an enemy very close to the player, where a hammer could cause maximum damage.
*There is barely anything substantial to have a plot section. It just continues to highlight that there is no overarching plot and the player holds. There is mention of a "Constants" but doesn't make it clear in this game. For these types of games, it could be beneficial to just have a "Premise". If there is not enough information to even provide a premise section, then it might be beneficial to just merge the information into gameplay.
Mount & Blade received "mixed or average" reviews according to the review aggregation website Metacritic.
Critics like Eurogamer, GameSpot, IGN and TechAdvisor praised it, describing it as one of the best implementations of medieval combat ever created.
Mount & Blade has received negative criticism for its repetitive quests, dialogues, and locations, as well as poor graphics quality.
This section is out of date. There's no need to mention a Sequel has been announced if they were already released. It should be rewritten to notate their release date, and also significant changes/new features from its predecessor, and if it is relevant, also include chronology. Anything that hasn't been released yet can retain the announcement information.
If you could address these issue, I will look further into it. Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 23:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
The map is wrong. 85.229.187.64 ( talk) 21:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)