This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oh, you can't throw shade on the corn. It'll die as sure as you're born. A solution has been found: the library's underground 'cause you can't throw shade on the corn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamfang ( talk • contribs) 01:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Is there any reason for making the image in the infobox a fixed size, rather than just letting each user's browser determine the appropriate size? Having a 387px image stretches out the infobox considerably, and if anyone needs to see the image at a larger size they can just click on it. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 20:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm curious why my edits were reverted. I didn't change any text in the main article. All I did was update some references that were broken or outdated. Jlin ( talk) 20:46, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oh, you can't throw shade on the corn. It'll die as sure as you're born. A solution has been found: the library's underground 'cause you can't throw shade on the corn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamfang ( talk • contribs) 01:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Is there any reason for making the image in the infobox a fixed size, rather than just letting each user's browser determine the appropriate size? Having a 387px image stretches out the infobox considerably, and if anyone needs to see the image at a larger size they can just click on it. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 20:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm curious why my edits were reverted. I didn't change any text in the main article. All I did was update some references that were broken or outdated. Jlin ( talk) 20:46, 4 August 2015 (UTC)