This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand
Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project where you can contribute to the
discussions and help with our
open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Sri Lanka and Taiwan looks distorted in the first image. (Map)
In the first image (Expansion of the Mongol Empire 1206–1294 superimposed on a modern political map of Eurasia), Sri Lanka looks significantly distorted. Taiwan also looks distorted. I could not grasp errors about the shape of other regions, as I could only recognize the shapes of the islands. I am not sure whether or not other countries are distorted as well. But at least can someone restore the original shape of those countries? Because the shape variations are obvious in them.
Samithufedo (
talk)
09:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Religious freedom?
The article states at
Mongol Empire#Early organization: "In addition to laws regarding family, food, and the army, Genghis also decreed religious freedom ...." However, three paragraphs later, under
Mongol Empire#Religious policies, it states, "Genghis Khan and a number of his Yuan successors placed restrictions on religious practices they saw as alien. ... Muslims were forbidden from
halal or
zabiha butchering, while Jews were similarly forbidden from
kashrut or
shehita butchering, both of which were incompatible with the
Mongolian method of butchery. Referring to the conquered subjects as 'our slaves,' Genghis Khan demanded they no longer be able to refuse food or drink, and imposed restrictions on slaughter." Then, after a blockquote, it states again, "Genghis Khan arranged for the Chinese Taoist master
Qiu Chuji to visit him in Afghanistan, and also gave his subjects the right to religious freedom, despite his own shamanistic beliefs."
Someone has removed all mentions of the states which preceded the Mongol Empire, which goes against the usual policy Wikipedia has of including all predecessor states or cultures, see the Austria-Hungary article for example
Godzillasizedemu (
talk)
03:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Actually I think this is correct - there are far too many of them; the list was not even that complete.
Roman Empire and
Roman Republic only list a single domestic predecessor. The infobox is far too cluttered even without them.
Johnbod (
talk)
03:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
You seem unaware that Wikipedia guidelines supplant vague precedent;
MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE states that "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance...wherever possible, present information in short form, and exclude any unnecessary content." Having a non-exhaustive list of a dozen entities, some of which hadn't been around in any meaningful way for decades (
Khamag Mongol) or centuries (
Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate), goes directly against the purpose of an infobox.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
11:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Might not there still be some merit in listing just the
Khamag Mongol and the four successor Khanates? I agree that the full list is ridiculous, confusing and unhelpful, but what about the minimalist approach?
Iskandar323 (
talk)
13:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I'd agree, but the four successor states are all mentioned in the quick timeline, so I think we are good as we currently are.
Johnbod (
talk)
04:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, a loose confederation. So loose, in fact, that no one knows what precisely is being talked about. I've just looked at seven sources of the early Mongol Empire; not one uses the term "Khamag Mongol", because it can mean literally anything you want it to. Confederation ending with the death of Ambhagai? Sure. The tribe to which Yesugei belonged? Why not. The forces Temujin built up? If you want. Anything so problematic should be given the same prominence reliable sources give it — none.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
18:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
There are various candidates for an accurate mongol flag/banner. One of these are the Mongol Suldes. Ancient records talk about the black and white banners of Genghis Khan, which could easily be identified as the mongol war suldes. Could I add these to the page?
There's also the Tamga of Genghis Khan, could I possibly add that to the page?
There's also the early mongol flag from the year 1310 shown in Alfred Znamierowski's World Encyclopedia of flags, could this page be considered a reliable source? And if so, can I add it to the page? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sci Show With Moh (
talk •
contribs)
23:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)reply
It's not a very pressing issue, but I don't see any problem with adding it. It wouldn't be in conflict with
MOS:FLAG. The potential problem is whether or not a representation of the flag can be found in a reliable source, as you said. Personally I think it's fine either way.
Professor Penguino (
talk)
01:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Wether or not they count as "Flags" or not is besides the point, as if they were military standards or any other symbol (which applies to the suldes) i can use it. I won't add them and label them in the modern sense of the term of course, as that didn't exist back then. It doesn't conflict with
MOS:FLAG as Professor Penguino said, therefore I can add it, but not under the label of "Flag" of course. (I'd only be adding the suldes, Genghis Khan's Tamga and the imperial seal of Guyuk Khan as seen in
Imperial Seal of the Mongols.) The suldes are accurate because they are the universally recognized war banner of the Mongol empire cited in many scholarly sources such as Starr Z Davies, and much more. As for Genghis Khan's Tamga, it is also cited on many scholarly sources, and as for Guyuk Khan's seal, it's literally here on wikipedia.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
01:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Problem 1: the site you have taken the flag from allows sharing of files only to
non-commercial web sites; this is not allowed on Commons per
their licensing policy. You'll need to upload it to Wikipedia instead—this is fairly simple, just click the three bars at the top-left of the page, click upload file, and upload under fair use. That's the easy part.
Problem 2: there is no RS specifically describing this image as the standard of the Mongol khans. There are images on other pages that are analysed by RS—File:Temüjin proclaimed as Genghis Khan in 1206 Jami' al-tawarikh manuscript.jpg has been described by Timothy May, for example. Until you can verify in a RS that this particular image is an accurate representation of what historical sources describe, it will not be suitable for such a prominent place in the infobox. This, I cannot do for you.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
16:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Also, This image is a reconstruction of the War Sulde used by Genghis Khan described in various modern & ancient sources. If you're saying that this is unreliable because of the 6 suldes shown, I can fix that. The Mongol's war sulde is described on the wikipedia page for the
Tug banner, also known as a sulde banner. Like every ancient banner, there are many different variations of it, the one I added to the page was the one shown on Vexilla Mundi, which is the only vectorized version of the sulde available. The same black war sulde is described in many ancient sources, and the common reconstruction of the sulde. I can't get my hands on some of the ancient records that describe the sulde, but I do know one, and it's the one cited on the page for the
Sulde banner. and IMO, that's enough.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
17:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
On a seperate note, there's a flag in Alfred Znamierowski's World Encyclopedia of Flags labeled as "Early Mongol Flag" dated to 1310 CE. Since Alfred Znamierowski was a recognized expert in Vexillology, could I possibly use that instead along with the Tamga of Genghis Khan?
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
22:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)reply
No, seeing as a) you clearly have not read the accompanying page which outlines how many different types of flag were used by various people in society, and b) you've completely ignored the date. Seriously, do you really think we're idiots?
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
23:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Because you inserted in the infobox, as if it was a modern flag which represented the entire Mongol Empire, instead of a war banner planted before a battle. This has been explained to you many times now.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
02:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The Roman aquilae were very literally symbols of a state, not just war standards held up when there was a battle. If there was a unifying feature of the Mongol Empire, it wasn't a flag, but the Chinggisid bloodline—fairly difficult to represent in 2D.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
02:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The two banners that I displayed in the infobox are the Peacetime banner and the Wartime banner, there is a seperate source for these designations that I can include if you want.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
15:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
It was the vexilloid used by the mongol forces, as I said earlier, the vexilloid used by roman forces is found on the roman empire page, so why can't I do something similar here?
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
15:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
At this point you are being deliberately obstructive. I said above clearly "The Roman aquilae were very literally symbols of a state, not just war standards held up when there was a battle." I suggest you try to understand the difference, or find sources that claim otherwise. As a reminder, the only source you have provided says "These horse-hair battle standards are among the few artifacts associated with Chinggis Khan that have been preserved to this day. Planted atop a hill, a mountain, or other lofty location, a standard such as one of these would have signaled the beginning of a battle."
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
15:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I actually have a source that claims otherwise, Jack Weatherford Genghis Khan, p.XVI, but I forgot to source it on my file. If I sourced this, would you accept it?
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
15:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I assume you mean Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World (2004)? That is not a sufficiently reliable source: although influential, it contains a large number of factual errors and inaccuracies, and Weatherford does not cite his work. Timothy May summarizes his work as follows: "In the general narrative Weatherford is sufficiently accurate. However, in the details, Weatherford is wrestling with material that he clearly does not fully appreciate."
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
16:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The article you linked does say what I want to say, it says: "The Black Banner was the khan’s battlefield banner, standing for the power of the “Everlasting Blue Heaven,” which can concentrate and mobilise the spirit and power of all Mongols to defeat their enemies at any time in all directions. Folk stories mention that the Black Banner would be raised when the khan was at war." and "White Banner The White Banner is also called ‘Yisun Kholt Tsagaan Tug’ or Peace Banner. It is mentioned in many historical works on the Mongols. The White Banner was raised during times of peace or in a place away from war. From ancient times until the present day, Mongolians have presented offerings to the White Banner. The main part of the White Banner is made from the tails of white mares. The main white banner is surrounded by eight banners. The offering ceremony to the White Banner was held during a grand ceremony once every three years. Since the 19th century this ceremony is part of the annual Naadam celebration."
No, what you want it to say is that "this banner was a symbol of the Mongol Empire". You can say that the banner was the symbol of Genghis Khan, which is why there is such a description of the banner in an image caption of his article. By all means, add it to the body, but it is not suitable for the infobox.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
00:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Fair point, but the Roman Vexillum which served a similar purpose was added to the infobox, which is why I think the mongol sulde should be added to the infobox in a similar manner. (The vexillum, not the aquila, by the way.) Also, the symbol of Timur was added to the infobox of the timurid empire. Feel free to correct me if this is wrong and doesn't justify it being added to the infobox though.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
00:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Sure, and all modern countries have their flags in the infobox. But we're not talking about modern countries, or Timurid symbols, or the Roman Empire.
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies here in a way. Unless you provide a reliable source for your claims and outline why it a) is reliable and b) shows that the banners were even a military standard FOR THE MONGOL EMPIRE, I don't intend to continue this vast discussion.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
03:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
It states that the actual belief that the British Empire was the largest empire in history with 33 700 000 square kilometers in 1939, and the Mongol one only the second with 32 500 000 square kilometers in 1279, is false. It proves that in fact, the Mongol Empire was larger than that. Because this number is based on an arbitrary northern frontier wich doesn't include northern Siberia. However, for exemple (all what I say is from the article), there are several sources from Jean de Plan Carpin and Guillaume de Rubrouck, wich all two traveled separately in the Mongol Empire around the years 1245 and 1250, saying that populations from northern Siberia like the Nenets were subjects of the Mongols. Marco Polo says in his book about mongolian expeditions into the "lands of darkness", as he call nothern Siberia (because there's no sun during long periods). There's also an Icelandic geographical treatise from the mid-13th century describing a "tatar kingdom at the north of the russian lands".
That's not all, i let you read the article for more evidences.
The article concludes that the real size of the Mongol Empire would be around 36 500 000 square kilometers, which would make it larger than the British Empire with a difference of roughly 3 millions square kilometers.
Therefor, we should change the text, the map and the infobox of this article with this new information, and I will post the same message in the talk section of the "List of largest empires" page.
Thanks for reading.
Antochkat
Antochkat (
talk)
17:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi
Antochkat, thanks for your comment and your interesting source. Pow's article certainly makes a good case, but the British Empire being the largest in history is established historical consensus, which cannot be overruled on the basis of a single paper. Perhaps this year's upcoming "Cambridge History of the Mongol Empire" will shed light on the issue, or some other source? We must hope.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
17:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi.
You say "the British Empire being the largest in history is established historical consensus". But the fact is that it is not. At the beginning of his article, Stephen Pow explains about this that:
"...thus, the issue of sweeping proportions investigated here is the borders of the Mongol Empire, particularly the question of its northern border. We often read that the Mongols in the thirteenth century possessed “the largest historical empire in terms of contiguous territory,” and its maximum size is set at 24 million km2 . A distinction is made between the British Empire as the largest historical empire at 35.5 million km2 (in 1920) and the Mongol Empire, listed as the second largest, albeit one not divided over several continents. The consistent reinforcement of these numbers and rankings on popular online sources like Wikipedia,2 or Worldatlas,3 makes them something like official, canonical facts".
If there is a popular consensus that the British Empire is the largest, it is because when we compare it with the Mongol Empire, we base ourselves on the arbitrary border of the Mongol Empire resulting from historiography of the 20th century.
Antochkat (
talk)
15:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Let me be clear: on a personal level, I completely agree with Pow's argument. But if the popular consensus is wrong, it is wrong—Wikipedia cannot do anything about that,
Antochkat. We cannot ignore the historiography of a century, no matter how arbitrary Pow feels it is, without his theory progressing from
WP:FRINGE to more established consensus. By design, Wikipedia is meant to be "behind the curve" of research—we must
weigh arguments according to their prevalence in
reliable sources, and at the moment, Pow is just one against many.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
15:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Vishgor: to reiterate: there is a clear
consensus for the omission of that from the infobox in previous discussions on this talk page. Not every parameter in an
infobox is equally useful in every situation, that's not what infoboxes are for. If a reader would like all of the details, they may read the article, the infobox is for summary at a glance.
Remsense诉04:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand
Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project where you can contribute to the
discussions and help with our
open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Sri Lanka and Taiwan looks distorted in the first image. (Map)
In the first image (Expansion of the Mongol Empire 1206–1294 superimposed on a modern political map of Eurasia), Sri Lanka looks significantly distorted. Taiwan also looks distorted. I could not grasp errors about the shape of other regions, as I could only recognize the shapes of the islands. I am not sure whether or not other countries are distorted as well. But at least can someone restore the original shape of those countries? Because the shape variations are obvious in them.
Samithufedo (
talk)
09:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Religious freedom?
The article states at
Mongol Empire#Early organization: "In addition to laws regarding family, food, and the army, Genghis also decreed religious freedom ...." However, three paragraphs later, under
Mongol Empire#Religious policies, it states, "Genghis Khan and a number of his Yuan successors placed restrictions on religious practices they saw as alien. ... Muslims were forbidden from
halal or
zabiha butchering, while Jews were similarly forbidden from
kashrut or
shehita butchering, both of which were incompatible with the
Mongolian method of butchery. Referring to the conquered subjects as 'our slaves,' Genghis Khan demanded they no longer be able to refuse food or drink, and imposed restrictions on slaughter." Then, after a blockquote, it states again, "Genghis Khan arranged for the Chinese Taoist master
Qiu Chuji to visit him in Afghanistan, and also gave his subjects the right to religious freedom, despite his own shamanistic beliefs."
Someone has removed all mentions of the states which preceded the Mongol Empire, which goes against the usual policy Wikipedia has of including all predecessor states or cultures, see the Austria-Hungary article for example
Godzillasizedemu (
talk)
03:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Actually I think this is correct - there are far too many of them; the list was not even that complete.
Roman Empire and
Roman Republic only list a single domestic predecessor. The infobox is far too cluttered even without them.
Johnbod (
talk)
03:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
You seem unaware that Wikipedia guidelines supplant vague precedent;
MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE states that "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance...wherever possible, present information in short form, and exclude any unnecessary content." Having a non-exhaustive list of a dozen entities, some of which hadn't been around in any meaningful way for decades (
Khamag Mongol) or centuries (
Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate), goes directly against the purpose of an infobox.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
11:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Might not there still be some merit in listing just the
Khamag Mongol and the four successor Khanates? I agree that the full list is ridiculous, confusing and unhelpful, but what about the minimalist approach?
Iskandar323 (
talk)
13:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I'd agree, but the four successor states are all mentioned in the quick timeline, so I think we are good as we currently are.
Johnbod (
talk)
04:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, a loose confederation. So loose, in fact, that no one knows what precisely is being talked about. I've just looked at seven sources of the early Mongol Empire; not one uses the term "Khamag Mongol", because it can mean literally anything you want it to. Confederation ending with the death of Ambhagai? Sure. The tribe to which Yesugei belonged? Why not. The forces Temujin built up? If you want. Anything so problematic should be given the same prominence reliable sources give it — none.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
18:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)reply
There are various candidates for an accurate mongol flag/banner. One of these are the Mongol Suldes. Ancient records talk about the black and white banners of Genghis Khan, which could easily be identified as the mongol war suldes. Could I add these to the page?
There's also the Tamga of Genghis Khan, could I possibly add that to the page?
There's also the early mongol flag from the year 1310 shown in Alfred Znamierowski's World Encyclopedia of flags, could this page be considered a reliable source? And if so, can I add it to the page? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sci Show With Moh (
talk •
contribs)
23:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)reply
It's not a very pressing issue, but I don't see any problem with adding it. It wouldn't be in conflict with
MOS:FLAG. The potential problem is whether or not a representation of the flag can be found in a reliable source, as you said. Personally I think it's fine either way.
Professor Penguino (
talk)
01:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Wether or not they count as "Flags" or not is besides the point, as if they were military standards or any other symbol (which applies to the suldes) i can use it. I won't add them and label them in the modern sense of the term of course, as that didn't exist back then. It doesn't conflict with
MOS:FLAG as Professor Penguino said, therefore I can add it, but not under the label of "Flag" of course. (I'd only be adding the suldes, Genghis Khan's Tamga and the imperial seal of Guyuk Khan as seen in
Imperial Seal of the Mongols.) The suldes are accurate because they are the universally recognized war banner of the Mongol empire cited in many scholarly sources such as Starr Z Davies, and much more. As for Genghis Khan's Tamga, it is also cited on many scholarly sources, and as for Guyuk Khan's seal, it's literally here on wikipedia.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
01:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Problem 1: the site you have taken the flag from allows sharing of files only to
non-commercial web sites; this is not allowed on Commons per
their licensing policy. You'll need to upload it to Wikipedia instead—this is fairly simple, just click the three bars at the top-left of the page, click upload file, and upload under fair use. That's the easy part.
Problem 2: there is no RS specifically describing this image as the standard of the Mongol khans. There are images on other pages that are analysed by RS—File:Temüjin proclaimed as Genghis Khan in 1206 Jami' al-tawarikh manuscript.jpg has been described by Timothy May, for example. Until you can verify in a RS that this particular image is an accurate representation of what historical sources describe, it will not be suitable for such a prominent place in the infobox. This, I cannot do for you.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
16:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Also, This image is a reconstruction of the War Sulde used by Genghis Khan described in various modern & ancient sources. If you're saying that this is unreliable because of the 6 suldes shown, I can fix that. The Mongol's war sulde is described on the wikipedia page for the
Tug banner, also known as a sulde banner. Like every ancient banner, there are many different variations of it, the one I added to the page was the one shown on Vexilla Mundi, which is the only vectorized version of the sulde available. The same black war sulde is described in many ancient sources, and the common reconstruction of the sulde. I can't get my hands on some of the ancient records that describe the sulde, but I do know one, and it's the one cited on the page for the
Sulde banner. and IMO, that's enough.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
17:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
On a seperate note, there's a flag in Alfred Znamierowski's World Encyclopedia of Flags labeled as "Early Mongol Flag" dated to 1310 CE. Since Alfred Znamierowski was a recognized expert in Vexillology, could I possibly use that instead along with the Tamga of Genghis Khan?
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
22:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)reply
No, seeing as a) you clearly have not read the accompanying page which outlines how many different types of flag were used by various people in society, and b) you've completely ignored the date. Seriously, do you really think we're idiots?
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
23:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Because you inserted in the infobox, as if it was a modern flag which represented the entire Mongol Empire, instead of a war banner planted before a battle. This has been explained to you many times now.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
02:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The Roman aquilae were very literally symbols of a state, not just war standards held up when there was a battle. If there was a unifying feature of the Mongol Empire, it wasn't a flag, but the Chinggisid bloodline—fairly difficult to represent in 2D.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
02:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The two banners that I displayed in the infobox are the Peacetime banner and the Wartime banner, there is a seperate source for these designations that I can include if you want.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
15:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
It was the vexilloid used by the mongol forces, as I said earlier, the vexilloid used by roman forces is found on the roman empire page, so why can't I do something similar here?
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
15:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
At this point you are being deliberately obstructive. I said above clearly "The Roman aquilae were very literally symbols of a state, not just war standards held up when there was a battle." I suggest you try to understand the difference, or find sources that claim otherwise. As a reminder, the only source you have provided says "These horse-hair battle standards are among the few artifacts associated with Chinggis Khan that have been preserved to this day. Planted atop a hill, a mountain, or other lofty location, a standard such as one of these would have signaled the beginning of a battle."
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
15:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I actually have a source that claims otherwise, Jack Weatherford Genghis Khan, p.XVI, but I forgot to source it on my file. If I sourced this, would you accept it?
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
15:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I assume you mean Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World (2004)? That is not a sufficiently reliable source: although influential, it contains a large number of factual errors and inaccuracies, and Weatherford does not cite his work. Timothy May summarizes his work as follows: "In the general narrative Weatherford is sufficiently accurate. However, in the details, Weatherford is wrestling with material that he clearly does not fully appreciate."
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
16:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The article you linked does say what I want to say, it says: "The Black Banner was the khan’s battlefield banner, standing for the power of the “Everlasting Blue Heaven,” which can concentrate and mobilise the spirit and power of all Mongols to defeat their enemies at any time in all directions. Folk stories mention that the Black Banner would be raised when the khan was at war." and "White Banner The White Banner is also called ‘Yisun Kholt Tsagaan Tug’ or Peace Banner. It is mentioned in many historical works on the Mongols. The White Banner was raised during times of peace or in a place away from war. From ancient times until the present day, Mongolians have presented offerings to the White Banner. The main part of the White Banner is made from the tails of white mares. The main white banner is surrounded by eight banners. The offering ceremony to the White Banner was held during a grand ceremony once every three years. Since the 19th century this ceremony is part of the annual Naadam celebration."
No, what you want it to say is that "this banner was a symbol of the Mongol Empire". You can say that the banner was the symbol of Genghis Khan, which is why there is such a description of the banner in an image caption of his article. By all means, add it to the body, but it is not suitable for the infobox.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
00:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Fair point, but the Roman Vexillum which served a similar purpose was added to the infobox, which is why I think the mongol sulde should be added to the infobox in a similar manner. (The vexillum, not the aquila, by the way.) Also, the symbol of Timur was added to the infobox of the timurid empire. Feel free to correct me if this is wrong and doesn't justify it being added to the infobox though.
Sci Show With Moh (
talk)
00:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Sure, and all modern countries have their flags in the infobox. But we're not talking about modern countries, or Timurid symbols, or the Roman Empire.
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies here in a way. Unless you provide a reliable source for your claims and outline why it a) is reliable and b) shows that the banners were even a military standard FOR THE MONGOL EMPIRE, I don't intend to continue this vast discussion.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
03:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
It states that the actual belief that the British Empire was the largest empire in history with 33 700 000 square kilometers in 1939, and the Mongol one only the second with 32 500 000 square kilometers in 1279, is false. It proves that in fact, the Mongol Empire was larger than that. Because this number is based on an arbitrary northern frontier wich doesn't include northern Siberia. However, for exemple (all what I say is from the article), there are several sources from Jean de Plan Carpin and Guillaume de Rubrouck, wich all two traveled separately in the Mongol Empire around the years 1245 and 1250, saying that populations from northern Siberia like the Nenets were subjects of the Mongols. Marco Polo says in his book about mongolian expeditions into the "lands of darkness", as he call nothern Siberia (because there's no sun during long periods). There's also an Icelandic geographical treatise from the mid-13th century describing a "tatar kingdom at the north of the russian lands".
That's not all, i let you read the article for more evidences.
The article concludes that the real size of the Mongol Empire would be around 36 500 000 square kilometers, which would make it larger than the British Empire with a difference of roughly 3 millions square kilometers.
Therefor, we should change the text, the map and the infobox of this article with this new information, and I will post the same message in the talk section of the "List of largest empires" page.
Thanks for reading.
Antochkat
Antochkat (
talk)
17:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi
Antochkat, thanks for your comment and your interesting source. Pow's article certainly makes a good case, but the British Empire being the largest in history is established historical consensus, which cannot be overruled on the basis of a single paper. Perhaps this year's upcoming "Cambridge History of the Mongol Empire" will shed light on the issue, or some other source? We must hope.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
17:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi.
You say "the British Empire being the largest in history is established historical consensus". But the fact is that it is not. At the beginning of his article, Stephen Pow explains about this that:
"...thus, the issue of sweeping proportions investigated here is the borders of the Mongol Empire, particularly the question of its northern border. We often read that the Mongols in the thirteenth century possessed “the largest historical empire in terms of contiguous territory,” and its maximum size is set at 24 million km2 . A distinction is made between the British Empire as the largest historical empire at 35.5 million km2 (in 1920) and the Mongol Empire, listed as the second largest, albeit one not divided over several continents. The consistent reinforcement of these numbers and rankings on popular online sources like Wikipedia,2 or Worldatlas,3 makes them something like official, canonical facts".
If there is a popular consensus that the British Empire is the largest, it is because when we compare it with the Mongol Empire, we base ourselves on the arbitrary border of the Mongol Empire resulting from historiography of the 20th century.
Antochkat (
talk)
15:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Let me be clear: on a personal level, I completely agree with Pow's argument. But if the popular consensus is wrong, it is wrong—Wikipedia cannot do anything about that,
Antochkat. We cannot ignore the historiography of a century, no matter how arbitrary Pow feels it is, without his theory progressing from
WP:FRINGE to more established consensus. By design, Wikipedia is meant to be "behind the curve" of research—we must
weigh arguments according to their prevalence in
reliable sources, and at the moment, Pow is just one against many.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
15:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Vishgor: to reiterate: there is a clear
consensus for the omission of that from the infobox in previous discussions on this talk page. Not every parameter in an
infobox is equally useful in every situation, that's not what infoboxes are for. If a reader would like all of the details, they may read the article, the infobox is for summary at a glance.
Remsense诉04:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply