![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
So what longer text is this copied-and-pasted from, and why is it in past tense?
This might be a little off-topic, but I just want to elaborate on the following one. So, according to the article, the cum shot is this filmed moment the audience has paid to see. Considering the fact that the predominant majority of the audience of porn films are men, they all pay to see another guy cum. Doesn't this make you kinda gay, if you pay to see stuff like this? Not that there is something wrong with being gay, but if I watch a porn film, I want to see women cum, not men, for God's sake! White rotten rabbit ( talk) 13:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The reference to the use of the term in pornography is a disjointed mess of a paragraph which doesn't answer the question it raises: whether it means the scene the audience paid to see, or the scene the "actor" got paid for? The last sentence including quote from Linda Williams gives no clarification on that at all (and it is not at all clear that the quote from her is even refering to which of these it means.) I am going to be bold and remove the last sentence and try and improve the rest a little. 82.18.164.15 ( talk) 19:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Besides the intro's main definition, has the term any usage in the sense of a particular scene / set-piece being a one-take matter, so that if it doesn't go correct, the money used on it would be wasted? I don't want to insert original research, but just wondering if this might be another context in which the term has been used by a director or cinematographer?
To help balance the article the term could be explained as it is used in general cinematography a bit more fully. There might be quotations from on-set discussion for instance between a director and cinematographer. If something along this line could be found then it might help fix the issue of undue weighting towards pornographic usage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.133.139 ( talk) 19:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
It's clear that there are multiple meanings of the term Money shot in different areas (the rather non-standard "in ____" headings demonstrate that), so I think the best way forward here is to convert Money shot into a disambiguation page: its use in pornography could list it as an alternative to Cum shot, in journalism we could merge the current section (and add additional material) to make a stub Money shot (journalism), etc. Any thoughts? GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm suggesting converting this article into a disambiguation page; something like:
Money shot may refer to:
GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 00:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, sports usages of the term "money shot" can be found as early as 1928. Perhaps this sense could be included in any disambiguation page also. ----
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Money shot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
So what longer text is this copied-and-pasted from, and why is it in past tense?
This might be a little off-topic, but I just want to elaborate on the following one. So, according to the article, the cum shot is this filmed moment the audience has paid to see. Considering the fact that the predominant majority of the audience of porn films are men, they all pay to see another guy cum. Doesn't this make you kinda gay, if you pay to see stuff like this? Not that there is something wrong with being gay, but if I watch a porn film, I want to see women cum, not men, for God's sake! White rotten rabbit ( talk) 13:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The reference to the use of the term in pornography is a disjointed mess of a paragraph which doesn't answer the question it raises: whether it means the scene the audience paid to see, or the scene the "actor" got paid for? The last sentence including quote from Linda Williams gives no clarification on that at all (and it is not at all clear that the quote from her is even refering to which of these it means.) I am going to be bold and remove the last sentence and try and improve the rest a little. 82.18.164.15 ( talk) 19:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Besides the intro's main definition, has the term any usage in the sense of a particular scene / set-piece being a one-take matter, so that if it doesn't go correct, the money used on it would be wasted? I don't want to insert original research, but just wondering if this might be another context in which the term has been used by a director or cinematographer?
To help balance the article the term could be explained as it is used in general cinematography a bit more fully. There might be quotations from on-set discussion for instance between a director and cinematographer. If something along this line could be found then it might help fix the issue of undue weighting towards pornographic usage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.133.139 ( talk) 19:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
It's clear that there are multiple meanings of the term Money shot in different areas (the rather non-standard "in ____" headings demonstrate that), so I think the best way forward here is to convert Money shot into a disambiguation page: its use in pornography could list it as an alternative to Cum shot, in journalism we could merge the current section (and add additional material) to make a stub Money shot (journalism), etc. Any thoughts? GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm suggesting converting this article into a disambiguation page; something like:
Money shot may refer to:
GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 00:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, sports usages of the term "money shot" can be found as early as 1928. Perhaps this sense could be included in any disambiguation page also. ----
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Money shot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)