This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Money in the Bank ladder match article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Does anyone else think that we should organize the Money In The Bank Qualifying matches sort of how we organize Royal Rumble Qualifying matches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Dagon ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Does it need to be mentioned that when Edge cashed in against the Undertaker, Undertaker had just had a match. Bam123456789 ( talk) 11:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Here are some things that can get this article to C or even B-Class:
I did some copyediting and added a free use image of Punk with the brief case. Let me know if you want me to have another look at the article or reassess the class. Nikki 311 23:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
According to this source: http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/1296.html the final two qualifiers for the 2009 Money in the Bank match are Christian and Finlay. I am not sure of the policy on adding information that hasn't aired on TV, i.e. title changes or heel/face turns. Therefore, for the time being, I am adding Christian and Finlay as the final two participants, unless it is wrong to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.107.231.69 ( talk) 04:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
this MITB of 2009 have not happen yet, the last part says that kane won, wrestlemania is this sunday, please sombody correct that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.1.201.251 ( talk) 12:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Somebody know if you can change the briefcase the same night at WRESTLEMANIA??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.60.0 ( talk) 21:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Someone has put up false info in the match history section, and I don't know how to multi-undo. Can someone undo this mess?-- Yugiohmike2001 ( talk) 23:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Why is there a Money in the Bank ladder match listed in the Match history section as there being a Money in the Bank ladder match at the Moeny in the Bank PPV? The Money in the Bank PPV isen't even scheduled to be on PPV until after WrestleMania XXVI, Extreme Rules, Over the Limit, and Fatal Four Way. After the Fatal Four Way PPV's matches have been announced and the PPV has taken place, only then will we know if there will be a Money in the Bank ladder match at the Money in the Bank PPV.
I think that it is safe to assume that a PPV called Money in the Bank will have a Money in a Bank ladder match, but we won't know until the WWE announces the match and it is not right to go ahead and add the match to the Match history section with no source, yet. Until then, I think that the Money in the Bank ladder match listed in the Match history section as being held at the Money in the Bank PPV, should be deleted until the WWE confirms otherwise. I will go ahead and delete that match from the Match history. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 22:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone know how long the Money in the Bank Ladder Match at WrestleMana XXVI took? If anyone knows, can it be added to the list? Thanks. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 02:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Would it be a good idea to calculate how long each WWE Superstar held onto the Money in the Bank Contract before cashing it in and adding it to the article? I would be all for it, and would add the information to the article, but don't know where to put the information in the article and before I did that, would like for people to give their opinion as to weather this information should even be in the article. Thanks. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 03:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
This page here is about the MITB match at WrestleMania. Not the MITB macth at the MITB ppv. Can we just take those out since they are not a part of the WrestleMania MITB?-- Nascarking ( talk) 18:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't be noted that Edge has been involved in every single Cashing in of the MITB Briefcase. He cashed in the 1st on John Cena. He Speared Cena which allowed Rob Van Dam to win the WWE Championship. He won a match against Mr. Kennedy that had the MITB contract from WrestleMania 23 on the line, which he cashed in on The Undertaker. He then was on the receiving end of the MITB contract cashing in when a pissed of Batista beat the living Hell out of him, which then a couple of seconds later CM Punk would show up to cash in his MITB Briefcase from WrestleMania XXIV. 11 Months later, Jeff Hardy would beat Edge in a Hell of a Ladder Match, in a couple of seconds later CM Punk showed up with his MITB Briefcase from WrestleMania XXV. Jeff Hardy didn't stand a chance due to the ladder match with Edge, that was also a record for the shortest World Heavyweight Championship Reign in history a 2 minutes. And then last but not least. Edge speared an injured Chris Jericho. Then Jack Swagger knocks out Edge with his MITB Briefcase from WrestleMania XXVI and then proceeds to the ring to give Jericho the Gutwrench Powerbomb and win the World Heavyweight Championship. I guess you can say if Edge isn't involved in the cashing in of the contract, then he won't do it right then.-- Nascarking ( talk) 05:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Nascarking, I had added that. But, someone deleted it.-- Thenodrin —Preceding undated comment added 15:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC).
Havent the FCW divas competed in a couple MITB matches. Even if they are not Ladder Matches, maybe it should still be pointed out.
& also a similar format for TNA, even if the matches have been retired.
24.24.221.54 ( talk) 04:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) CobraMorph
Hmm. I could have sworn that at one point, in addition to including the ultimate result of each briefcase's final cash-in, this page also included examples of each Mr. MITB's "never mind" moments: When he came down to make an attempted cash-in, only to be foiled or change his mind before the match became official. Off the top of my head I can think of Del Rio getting kicked in the head by CM Punk right after Punk beat Cena for the title; Swagger trying to cash in on Cena but getting thrown around and deciding Cena wasn't beaten down enough to attempt a cash-in, and I'm sure there are a couple more.
Did we decide as a community to no longer include those on the page, or were they removed unilaterally? I think they bear mentioning here, perhaps in a separate section so as not to overly clutter the current table. ekedolphin ( talk) 10:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the list of cash-ins is redundant, as the match break-down contains that same info, plus much more detail.
I think instead we should have a break down of the varios types of MITB matches. WM version that can be cashed in on any title from 2007-2010, the brand specific versions 2005,2010-11, & now the title specific versions 2012,13. Example being Sandow has competed in both for the WHC-MITB, yet never a WWE title version. Jericho competed in three MITBs that could be cashed in on RAW's specific title, one that could be used on any of the then three world titles. etc
24.24.231.104 ( talk) 03:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
I think there should have a break down of the various types of MITB matches. WM version that can be cashed in on any title from 2007-2010, the brand specific versions 2005,2010-11, & now the title specific versions 2012,13. Example being Sandow has competed in both for the WHC-MITB, yet never a WWE title version. Jericho competed in three MITBs that could be cashed in on RAW's specific title, & one that could be used on any of the then three world titles. etc
24.24.231.104 ( talk) 03:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
In the 2013 Money In The Bank ladder match for the world heavyweight championship, Roman Reigns appeared to help Dean Ambrose, does this count as an appearance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.140.107 ( talk) 06:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Between winner and 'other competitors' I think we should have a narrow column for putting the number of competitors for an easy visual comparison, since the number of men in the ladder match has varied. Agree or disagree? 174.92.134.248 ( talk) 22:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
This article is all about the Money in the Bank Contract, not the ladder match itself. It covers everything from winning the match through cashing it in. I propose we move the page from Money in the Bank ladder match to Money in the Bank Contract. Does anyone have any objections to this? - Galatz Talk 01:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The introductory paragraph doesn't mention what the MITB briefcase does and is for, specifically it fails to mention that it is for a championship match that can be cashed in at any time (and maybe we should mention how successful it has been in the past to result in a new champion, and how Rollins used it to insert himself into an existing championship match). I think the introductory paragraph should mention all this for the layperson, thoughts? Iokerapid ( talk) 15:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
So I'm sure we're all aware of the 'controversy' over the original Woman's MITB match and it's result. However, shouldn't it still count as both an appearance AND a victory for "Carmella"? The suitcase/title was stripped from her yes, but that still solidifies that it was a win. Generally, no WWE official reversed the match and the dialogue in successive events indicate that she was indeed the winner. (Even if it was James Ellsworth who announced it.) No one disputed the fact that she won. Danielson stripping her of the contract doesn't negate that she won the MATCH, which is what the table is counting. retched ( talk) 00:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Exactly! Just like how Finn won the Universal Championship but was forced to relinquish it! or How Naomi won the Women's title but was force to relinquish it because of her injury. Carmella won it the 1st and 2nd time. HulaHoopWWE ( talk) 02:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I tend to agree, Carmella won the match but was stripped of the briefcase. The win is still a win. Bakilas ( talk) 07:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Carmella won a match, that's true, she won the match. However, her prize (the briefcase) was revoked. Yesterday, before the second money in the bank, she isn't listed as Money in the Bank Winner. WWE revered the decision, something common (like Kofi Kingston winning a tournament for the IC Title) -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 23:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Retched has made plenty fair points to keep Carmella's victory as 2 instead of 1, I don't know why we're still arguing about it. There have been MANY Title strips the next day or in this case 2 days because of a controversial finish or just managers stripping the title. In the end they were still counted as victories even if it was for 1 or 2 days. Just like Carmella was STRIPPED of the Briefcase not the match being reversed. There are plenty of titles that get stripped and a new match for the title is scheduled for next episode or the same night, yet the original title holder that had it before they were stripped of it was still counted for the win. Therefor Carmella is and STILL a 2 time Women's MITB winner. HulaHoopWWE ( talk) 03:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm gonna explain my point. Carmella won TWO MITB ladder matches, that's a fact. However, i'm against she is a TWO times MITB briefcase holder. She is a TWO times winner, but she only holds ONE briefcase because her first briefcase was reversed (source https://web.archive.org/web/20170627103340/http://www.wwe.com/superstars/carmella) For me, the C&A section is for the briefcase, not the match (Edge has the MITB 2007 even he lost the match, because he won the briefcase) -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 11:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
References
Should there be a combined list for the matches? there all the same match, there isn't separate lists for woman holding a man's title and vice versa. Slimdog45 ( talk) 02:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Can I go ahead and update the times that a superstar was in a match VWilliamsWWE ( talk) 13:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Below is what is currently in the article: "Ambrose was the third winner to announce that he would cash in the contract in advance, albeit without a set date and before he had won the ladder match to collect the contract."
What exactly did he say and are there any sources that say he gave advanced notice? Mobile mundo ( talk) 14:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
I think we should have protection on this page. Just until the trolls die out after a week, seems people still dont get that Carmella won Twice SSGeorgie ( talk) 01:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Such as Ambrose being the second to cash in on the same night. Stop removing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:483:300:195B:79E5:3099:8245:F83 ( talk) 18:21, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Can’t answer my question? Yeah, I didn’t think so. Hypocrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.153.168 ( talk) 17:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
On the May 20th, 2019 edition of Monday Night RAW, the announcers mentioned that because of the new Wildcard Rule (where four superstars of RAW can appear as a guest on Smackdown and vice versa), the Money in the Bank contract can be used on either champion (WWE or Universal). Should the passage about the 2019 be edited to reflect this? (Before it gets disputed, it seems to be a recurring angle mentioned by them throughout the night.) retched ( talk) 00:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Where is the proof the ladder matches were taped in April 2020? -- Evil Yugi ( talk) 01:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed Asuka from the Cash in table. The table before that says Asuka didn't cash in the briefcase and it was no match. There is no point to include her in a table named Cash in matches. Like the WrestleMania matches in the Royal Rumble article, we don't include Flair nor Triple H because that matches were for the title itself. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
The cash-in match table currently has The Miz's reversed cash-in in it with no number, which I think is good since it was an actual cash-in, but it doesn't include Daniel Bryan's reversed cash-in on Mark Henry. It should include neither or both to be consistent, as well as any other reversed cash-ins. I'm okay with including them all or excluding them all, but it seems wrong to only have 1. Shinra07 ( talk) 16:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Money in the Bank ladder match article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Does anyone else think that we should organize the Money In The Bank Qualifying matches sort of how we organize Royal Rumble Qualifying matches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Dagon ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Does it need to be mentioned that when Edge cashed in against the Undertaker, Undertaker had just had a match. Bam123456789 ( talk) 11:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Here are some things that can get this article to C or even B-Class:
I did some copyediting and added a free use image of Punk with the brief case. Let me know if you want me to have another look at the article or reassess the class. Nikki 311 23:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
According to this source: http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/1296.html the final two qualifiers for the 2009 Money in the Bank match are Christian and Finlay. I am not sure of the policy on adding information that hasn't aired on TV, i.e. title changes or heel/face turns. Therefore, for the time being, I am adding Christian and Finlay as the final two participants, unless it is wrong to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.107.231.69 ( talk) 04:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
this MITB of 2009 have not happen yet, the last part says that kane won, wrestlemania is this sunday, please sombody correct that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.1.201.251 ( talk) 12:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Somebody know if you can change the briefcase the same night at WRESTLEMANIA??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.60.0 ( talk) 21:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Someone has put up false info in the match history section, and I don't know how to multi-undo. Can someone undo this mess?-- Yugiohmike2001 ( talk) 23:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Why is there a Money in the Bank ladder match listed in the Match history section as there being a Money in the Bank ladder match at the Moeny in the Bank PPV? The Money in the Bank PPV isen't even scheduled to be on PPV until after WrestleMania XXVI, Extreme Rules, Over the Limit, and Fatal Four Way. After the Fatal Four Way PPV's matches have been announced and the PPV has taken place, only then will we know if there will be a Money in the Bank ladder match at the Money in the Bank PPV.
I think that it is safe to assume that a PPV called Money in the Bank will have a Money in a Bank ladder match, but we won't know until the WWE announces the match and it is not right to go ahead and add the match to the Match history section with no source, yet. Until then, I think that the Money in the Bank ladder match listed in the Match history section as being held at the Money in the Bank PPV, should be deleted until the WWE confirms otherwise. I will go ahead and delete that match from the Match history. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 22:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone know how long the Money in the Bank Ladder Match at WrestleMana XXVI took? If anyone knows, can it be added to the list? Thanks. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 02:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Would it be a good idea to calculate how long each WWE Superstar held onto the Money in the Bank Contract before cashing it in and adding it to the article? I would be all for it, and would add the information to the article, but don't know where to put the information in the article and before I did that, would like for people to give their opinion as to weather this information should even be in the article. Thanks. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 03:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
This page here is about the MITB match at WrestleMania. Not the MITB macth at the MITB ppv. Can we just take those out since they are not a part of the WrestleMania MITB?-- Nascarking ( talk) 18:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't be noted that Edge has been involved in every single Cashing in of the MITB Briefcase. He cashed in the 1st on John Cena. He Speared Cena which allowed Rob Van Dam to win the WWE Championship. He won a match against Mr. Kennedy that had the MITB contract from WrestleMania 23 on the line, which he cashed in on The Undertaker. He then was on the receiving end of the MITB contract cashing in when a pissed of Batista beat the living Hell out of him, which then a couple of seconds later CM Punk would show up to cash in his MITB Briefcase from WrestleMania XXIV. 11 Months later, Jeff Hardy would beat Edge in a Hell of a Ladder Match, in a couple of seconds later CM Punk showed up with his MITB Briefcase from WrestleMania XXV. Jeff Hardy didn't stand a chance due to the ladder match with Edge, that was also a record for the shortest World Heavyweight Championship Reign in history a 2 minutes. And then last but not least. Edge speared an injured Chris Jericho. Then Jack Swagger knocks out Edge with his MITB Briefcase from WrestleMania XXVI and then proceeds to the ring to give Jericho the Gutwrench Powerbomb and win the World Heavyweight Championship. I guess you can say if Edge isn't involved in the cashing in of the contract, then he won't do it right then.-- Nascarking ( talk) 05:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Nascarking, I had added that. But, someone deleted it.-- Thenodrin —Preceding undated comment added 15:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC).
Havent the FCW divas competed in a couple MITB matches. Even if they are not Ladder Matches, maybe it should still be pointed out.
& also a similar format for TNA, even if the matches have been retired.
24.24.221.54 ( talk) 04:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) CobraMorph
Hmm. I could have sworn that at one point, in addition to including the ultimate result of each briefcase's final cash-in, this page also included examples of each Mr. MITB's "never mind" moments: When he came down to make an attempted cash-in, only to be foiled or change his mind before the match became official. Off the top of my head I can think of Del Rio getting kicked in the head by CM Punk right after Punk beat Cena for the title; Swagger trying to cash in on Cena but getting thrown around and deciding Cena wasn't beaten down enough to attempt a cash-in, and I'm sure there are a couple more.
Did we decide as a community to no longer include those on the page, or were they removed unilaterally? I think they bear mentioning here, perhaps in a separate section so as not to overly clutter the current table. ekedolphin ( talk) 10:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the list of cash-ins is redundant, as the match break-down contains that same info, plus much more detail.
I think instead we should have a break down of the varios types of MITB matches. WM version that can be cashed in on any title from 2007-2010, the brand specific versions 2005,2010-11, & now the title specific versions 2012,13. Example being Sandow has competed in both for the WHC-MITB, yet never a WWE title version. Jericho competed in three MITBs that could be cashed in on RAW's specific title, one that could be used on any of the then three world titles. etc
24.24.231.104 ( talk) 03:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
I think there should have a break down of the various types of MITB matches. WM version that can be cashed in on any title from 2007-2010, the brand specific versions 2005,2010-11, & now the title specific versions 2012,13. Example being Sandow has competed in both for the WHC-MITB, yet never a WWE title version. Jericho competed in three MITBs that could be cashed in on RAW's specific title, & one that could be used on any of the then three world titles. etc
24.24.231.104 ( talk) 03:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
In the 2013 Money In The Bank ladder match for the world heavyweight championship, Roman Reigns appeared to help Dean Ambrose, does this count as an appearance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.140.107 ( talk) 06:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Between winner and 'other competitors' I think we should have a narrow column for putting the number of competitors for an easy visual comparison, since the number of men in the ladder match has varied. Agree or disagree? 174.92.134.248 ( talk) 22:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
This article is all about the Money in the Bank Contract, not the ladder match itself. It covers everything from winning the match through cashing it in. I propose we move the page from Money in the Bank ladder match to Money in the Bank Contract. Does anyone have any objections to this? - Galatz Talk 01:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The introductory paragraph doesn't mention what the MITB briefcase does and is for, specifically it fails to mention that it is for a championship match that can be cashed in at any time (and maybe we should mention how successful it has been in the past to result in a new champion, and how Rollins used it to insert himself into an existing championship match). I think the introductory paragraph should mention all this for the layperson, thoughts? Iokerapid ( talk) 15:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
So I'm sure we're all aware of the 'controversy' over the original Woman's MITB match and it's result. However, shouldn't it still count as both an appearance AND a victory for "Carmella"? The suitcase/title was stripped from her yes, but that still solidifies that it was a win. Generally, no WWE official reversed the match and the dialogue in successive events indicate that she was indeed the winner. (Even if it was James Ellsworth who announced it.) No one disputed the fact that she won. Danielson stripping her of the contract doesn't negate that she won the MATCH, which is what the table is counting. retched ( talk) 00:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Exactly! Just like how Finn won the Universal Championship but was forced to relinquish it! or How Naomi won the Women's title but was force to relinquish it because of her injury. Carmella won it the 1st and 2nd time. HulaHoopWWE ( talk) 02:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I tend to agree, Carmella won the match but was stripped of the briefcase. The win is still a win. Bakilas ( talk) 07:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Carmella won a match, that's true, she won the match. However, her prize (the briefcase) was revoked. Yesterday, before the second money in the bank, she isn't listed as Money in the Bank Winner. WWE revered the decision, something common (like Kofi Kingston winning a tournament for the IC Title) -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 23:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Retched has made plenty fair points to keep Carmella's victory as 2 instead of 1, I don't know why we're still arguing about it. There have been MANY Title strips the next day or in this case 2 days because of a controversial finish or just managers stripping the title. In the end they were still counted as victories even if it was for 1 or 2 days. Just like Carmella was STRIPPED of the Briefcase not the match being reversed. There are plenty of titles that get stripped and a new match for the title is scheduled for next episode or the same night, yet the original title holder that had it before they were stripped of it was still counted for the win. Therefor Carmella is and STILL a 2 time Women's MITB winner. HulaHoopWWE ( talk) 03:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm gonna explain my point. Carmella won TWO MITB ladder matches, that's a fact. However, i'm against she is a TWO times MITB briefcase holder. She is a TWO times winner, but she only holds ONE briefcase because her first briefcase was reversed (source https://web.archive.org/web/20170627103340/http://www.wwe.com/superstars/carmella) For me, the C&A section is for the briefcase, not the match (Edge has the MITB 2007 even he lost the match, because he won the briefcase) -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 11:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
References
Should there be a combined list for the matches? there all the same match, there isn't separate lists for woman holding a man's title and vice versa. Slimdog45 ( talk) 02:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Can I go ahead and update the times that a superstar was in a match VWilliamsWWE ( talk) 13:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Below is what is currently in the article: "Ambrose was the third winner to announce that he would cash in the contract in advance, albeit without a set date and before he had won the ladder match to collect the contract."
What exactly did he say and are there any sources that say he gave advanced notice? Mobile mundo ( talk) 14:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
I think we should have protection on this page. Just until the trolls die out after a week, seems people still dont get that Carmella won Twice SSGeorgie ( talk) 01:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Such as Ambrose being the second to cash in on the same night. Stop removing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:483:300:195B:79E5:3099:8245:F83 ( talk) 18:21, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Can’t answer my question? Yeah, I didn’t think so. Hypocrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.153.168 ( talk) 17:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
On the May 20th, 2019 edition of Monday Night RAW, the announcers mentioned that because of the new Wildcard Rule (where four superstars of RAW can appear as a guest on Smackdown and vice versa), the Money in the Bank contract can be used on either champion (WWE or Universal). Should the passage about the 2019 be edited to reflect this? (Before it gets disputed, it seems to be a recurring angle mentioned by them throughout the night.) retched ( talk) 00:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Where is the proof the ladder matches were taped in April 2020? -- Evil Yugi ( talk) 01:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed Asuka from the Cash in table. The table before that says Asuka didn't cash in the briefcase and it was no match. There is no point to include her in a table named Cash in matches. Like the WrestleMania matches in the Royal Rumble article, we don't include Flair nor Triple H because that matches were for the title itself. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
The cash-in match table currently has The Miz's reversed cash-in in it with no number, which I think is good since it was an actual cash-in, but it doesn't include Daniel Bryan's reversed cash-in on Mark Henry. It should include neither or both to be consistent, as well as any other reversed cash-ins. I'm okay with including them all or excluding them all, but it seems wrong to only have 1. Shinra07 ( talk) 16:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)